HomePage
 




 


 

ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
 

 

 

Editor-in-Chief

Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
 

Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
www http://www.transnav.eu
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Monitoring and Identification of DP Operators Behavioural Traits and Common Errors During Simulator Training
ABSTRACT: The article presents factors influencing decision making by Dynamic Positioning Operator (DPO) and statistics of the DPOs behaviour in an emergency situation. Considering that supply operation is performed by a DP vessel at a distance comparable to its width of the hull to the installation, unit, or another vessel, the thruster failure may lead to a rapidly developing incident such as collision, pollution, or human injuries. Based on the IMO guidelines on formal safety assessment authors suggested a risk model of platform supply operation in dynamic positioning mode. It is shown that different approaches shall be applied for rule-making and active decision support applications. While rulemaking can be mainly based on retrospective incident-based data, decision support shall be developed on the basis of the dynamic state of the system. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the nature of the human element in the specific operation to build up proper technological and organizational barriers to prevent the forthcoming critical error.
REFERENCES
Bogachenko, Y.: DP Concept: Principles of Dynamic Positioning. Seredniak T. K., Dnipro (2020).
DP Operations Guidance: Marine Technology Society (2012).
Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2016 (DPSI 27). (2017).
Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2017 (DPSI 28). (2018).
Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2018 (DPSI 29). (2019).
Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2019 (DPSI 29). (2020).
Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2020 (DPSI 30). (2021).
Guidelines for vessels and units with dynamic positioning (DP) systems: (2017).
Hauff, K.S.: Analysis of Loss of Position Incidents for Dynamically Operated Vessels. Department of Marine Technology, NTNU (2014).
Herdzik, J.: Dynamic Positioning Systems during emergency or unexpected situations. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 20, 3, 153–159 (2013).
International Maritime Organisation: IMO MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev.2 Revised Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in IMO Rule-Making Process. (2018).
Investigation of collision between Sjoborg supply ship and Statfjord A on 7 June 2019: Petroleum Safety Authority, Stavanger (2019).
Øvergård, K.I., Sorensen, L.J., Nazir, S., M - doi:10.1080/1463922X.2014.1001007
Pipchenko, O.: Monitoring and identificati - doi:10.15589/znp2020.2(480).1
Citation note:
Bogachenko Y., Pipchenko O.D.: Monitoring and Identification of DP Operators Behavioural Traits and Common Errors During Simulator Training. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 15, No. 2, doi:10.12716/1001.15.02.09, pp. 337-341, 2021

Other publications of authors:


File downloaded 41 times








Important: TransNav.eu cookie usage
The TransNav.eu website uses certain cookies. A cookie is a text-only string of information that the TransNav.EU website transfers to the cookie file of the browser on your computer. Cookies allow the TransNav.eu website to perform properly and remember your browsing history. Cookies also help a website to arrange content to match your preferred interests more quickly. Cookies alone cannot be used to identify you.
Akceptuję pliki cookies z tej strony