Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2024 Journal Impact Factor - 0.6
2024 CiteScore - 1.9
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Enhancing Container Handling Operations in Maritime Terminals Using the Ant Colony Optimization
1 Ibn Tofaïl University, Kénitra, Morocco
ABSTRACT: Numerous studies have underscored the significance of scheduling and optimization challenges within maritime terminals. This dissertation examines how to optimize container movements specifically for export operations, simultaneously taking into account the operating sequences of yard cranes and trucks. It also considers any potential interference that may arise among yard cranes. A survey of existing literature on yard crane scheduling indicates a lack of work addressing both unproductive crane moves and possible crane-to-crane interferences at the same time, which constitutes an innovative element in our study. Initially, the container loading scheduling task is formulated as a mixed-integer linear program, where the objective function aims to minimize the overall handling time required by the yard cranes. The mathematical model incorporates various assumptions that address interference effects and non-productive movements. In order to tackle this problem, an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS) heuristic is introduced. This strategy proves effective in managing optimization issues in container terminals, regardless of the size of the problem—whether it involves 10, 20, or even 100 containers. The data utilized for validating the method are intentionally generated, allowing for differences in both the number of containers and the amount of accessible handling equipment. Extensive testing verified the ALNS algorithm’s usefulness. Various situations were tested by combining various removal and insertion strategies, and the results demonstrated the ALNS method’s robustness.
KEYWORDS: Logistics, Optimization, Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Transport Systems, Mathematical Modelling, Decision Support Systems, Container Terminals, Scheduling
REFERENCES
Zhang, C., Wan, Y.-W., Liu, J., & Linn, R. J. (2002). Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(6), 537–555. - doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00017-0
Vis, I., & de Koster, R. (2003). Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 1–16. - doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00293-X
Steenken, D., Voß, S., & Stahlbock, R. (2004). Container terminal operation and operations research – a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum, 26, 3–49. - doi:10.1007/s00291-003-0157-z
Chen, L., & Langevin, A. (2011). Multiple yard cranes scheduling for loading operations in a container terminal. Engineering Optimization, 43(11), 1205–1221. - doi:10.1080/0305215X.2010.548865
Lee, D. H., Cao, J. X., & Shi, Q. X. (2009). Synchronization of yard truck scheduling and storage allocation in container terminals. Engineering Optimization, 41(7), 659–672. - doi:10.1080/03052150902752041
Kim, K. Y., & Kim, K. H. (1997). A routing algorithm for a single transfer crane to load export containers onto a containership. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 33(3–4), 673–676. - doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(97)00219-2
Kim, K. H., & Kim, K. Y. (1999). An optimal routing algorithm for a transfer crane in port container terminals. Transportation Science, 33(1), 17–33. - doi:10.1287/trsc.33.1.17
Linn, R. J., & Zhang, C. Q. (2003). A heuristic for dynamic yard crane deployment in a container terminal. IIE Transactions, 35(2), 161–174. - doi:10.1080/07408170304384
Ng, W. C. (2005). Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(1), 64–78. - doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.025
Lee, D. H., Cao, Z., & Meng, Q. (2007). Scheduling of two-transtainer systems for loading outbound containers in port container terminals with simulated annealing algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics, 107(1), 115–124. - doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.003
Guo, X., Huang, S. Y., Hsu, W. J., & Low, M. Y. H. (2008). Yard crane dispatching based on real-time data driven simulation for container terminals. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, 2648–2655. - doi:10.1109/WSC.2008.4736380
Evers, J. J. M., & Koppers, S. A. J. (1996). Automated guided vehicle traffic control at a container terminal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 30(1), 21–34. - doi:10.1016/0965-8564(95)00011-9
Bish, E. K. (2003). A multiple-crane-constrained scheduling problem in a container terminal. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(1), 83–107. - doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00382-4
Vis, I. F. A., & Harika, I. (2004). Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal. OR Spectrum, 26, 117–143. - doi:10.1007/s00291-003-0146-2
Kim, K. H., & Bae, J. W. (2004). A look-ahead dispatching method for automated guided vehicles in automated port container terminals. Transportation Science, 38(2), 224–234. - doi:10.1287/trsc.1030.0082
Huynh, N. (2009). Reducing truck turn times at marine terminals with appointment scheduling. Transportation Research Record, 2100(1), 29–36. - doi:10.3141/2100-06
Huynh, N., Walton, C. M., & Davis, J. (2004). Finding the number of yard cranes needed to achieve desired truck turn time at marine container terminals. Transportation Research Record, 1873(1), 64–71. - doi:10.3141/1873-12
Ng, W. C., & Ge, Y. (2006). Scheduling landside operations of a container terminal using a fuzzy heuristic. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 776–781. - doi:10.1109/INDIN.2006.275660
Zhang, H. L., & Jiang, Z. B. (2008). Simulation studies of heuristic approaches for dynamic scheduling of container terminal operations. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 28(4), 410–422. - doi:10.1080/02286203.2008.11442494
Cao, J. X., Lee, D. H., Chen, J. H., & Shi, Q. (2010). The integrated yard truck and yard crane scheduling problem: Benders’ decomposition-based methods. Transportation Research Part E, 46(3), 344–353. - doi:10.1016/j.tre.2009.08.012
Liang, C.-J., Ma, X.-F., & Chen, M. (2011). Study on yard crane scheduling with multiple container flows in a container terminal. Journal of Quality, 18(4), 375–392.
Imai, A., Sasaki, K., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2006). Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(2), 373–389. - doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.066
Alnaqi, M., Sayed, M. M., Aljarah, I., & Faris, H. (2025). A hybrid bald eagle search and growth optimizer algorithm for engineering design optimization problems. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 1234. - doi:10.1038/s41598-025-90000-8
Wang, Y., Wang, L., & Ahmed, S. (2024). A new framework to generate Lagrangian cuts in multistage stochastic mixed-integer programming. Optimization Online. https://optimization-online.org/2024/08/a-new-framework-to-generatelagrangian-cuts-in-multistage-stochastic-mixed-integer-programming/
Zhang, F., Liu, J., & Bertsimas, D. (2024). Two-phase re-optimization of modified MILP instances using historical solver information. OpenReview. https://openreview.net/forum?id=scdGzuwC9u
Zhou, H., Li, C., & Xu, T. (2025). Tribal intelligent evolution optimization: A novel bio-inspired algorithm for complex optimization problems. Applied Energy, 355, Article 121234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.121234
Eswaran, S. K., Sumathi, A., & Zubar, A. (2015). A hybrid ant colony optimization algorithm for job scheduling in computational grids. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 74, 377–380.
Kellenbrink, C., & Helber, S. (2023). Proactive project scheduling with flexible workforces using Tabu Search. Computers & Operations Research, 154, 106236. - doi:10.1016/j.cor.2023.106236
Dorigo, M. and Gambardella L.M. (1997) Ant Colonies for the Travelling Salesman Problem. Biosystems, 43, 73-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2647(97)01708-5 - doi:10.1016/S0303-2647(97)01708-5
Citation note:
Adam E.K., Youness S., Kamelia J., Hanaa H., Chakib E.M.: Enhancing Container Handling Operations in Maritime Terminals Using the Ant Colony Optimization. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 20, No. 1, doi:10.12716/1001.20.01.10, pp. 83-92, 2026
Authors in other databases:
El Khaldi Adam:
Jahnouni Kamelia:


58951411000
ulUTgu4AAAAJ