Journal is indexed in following databases:
- SCOPUS
- Web of Science Core Collection - Journal Citation Reports
- EBSCOhost
- Directory of Open Access Journals
- TRID Database - Transportation Research Board
- Index Copernicus Journals Master List
- BazTech
- Google Scholar
2025 Journal Impact Factor - 0.8
2025 CiteScore - 1.6
ISSN 2083-6473
ISSN 2083-6481 (electronic version)
Editor-in-Chief
Associate Editor
Prof. Tomasz Neumann
Published by
TransNav, Faculty of Navigation
Gdynia Maritime University
3, John Paul II Avenue
81-345 Gdynia, POLAND
e-mail transnav@umg.edu.pl
Bathymetry- and Sea-Ice-Constrained Feasibility Screening for Trans-Arctic Navigation
1 Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
ABSTRACT: Arctic route planning requires an initial assessment of whether candidate corridors are physically navigable before detailed voyage optimisation, vessel-performance modelling, or operational risk assessment is attempted. This paper presents a reproducible feasibility-screening workflow for trans-Arctic navigation under bathymetry and sea-ice concentration constraints. A regular pan-Arctic routing grid is constructed over 40–85◦N and 20◦W–180◦E for a Rotterdam–Yokohama case study. GEBCO 2024 bathymetry is used to exclude land and shallow-water cells, while CMEMS Arctic sea-ice concentration fields are used to exclude cells above selected ice-screening thresholds. The remaining feasible cells are represented as a graph, and A-star search with geodesic edge costs is used to compute shortest feasible routes. The contribution lies in the transparent integration of bathymetry and sea-ice screening into a reproducible navigation-feasibility workflow, rather than in proposing a new shortest-path algorithm. The case study evaluates a bathymetry-only baseline, date-dependent sea-ice feasibility maps, seasonal route-distance behaviour, and sensitivity to sea-ice concentration thresholds. The results show how route availability and route-distance ratio vary with the selected environmental screening assumptions. The workflow provides a practical pre-routing layer for Arctic navigation studies and can support later integration with vessel-performance, risk, and voyage-planning models.
KEYWORDS: Safety of Navigation, Risk Assessment, Ice Navigation, Marine Environment, Methods and Algorithms, Arctic Shipping, Route Planning and Weather Navigation, Hydrometeorological Aspects
REFERENCES
Chen, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., and Liu, X. (2023). Arctic route planning and navigation strategy. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(7), 1308. doi:10.3390/jmse11071308. - doi:10.3390/jmse11071308
Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service. (2023). Arctic Ocean Sea Ice Reanalysis. Copernicus Marine Service Marine Data Store. doi:10.48670/mds-00336.
GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group. (2024). The GEBCO 2024 Grid: a continuous terrain model of the global oceans and land. doi:10.5285/1c44ce99-0a0d-5f4f-e063-7086abc0ea0f.
International Maritime Organization. (2016). Guidance on methodologies for assessing operational capabilities and limitations in ice. MSC.1/Circ.1519.
Liu, Q., Zhang, Y., Li, X., and Huang, L. (2023). Arctic weather routing: a review of ship performance models and ice routing algorithms. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1190164. doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1190164. - doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1190164
Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment. (2024). Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System. PAME Arctic Shipping Project documentation.
Schroder, C., Reimer, N., Jochmann, P., and Rinke, A. (2017). Environmental impact of exhaust emissions by Arctic shipping. Ambio, 46, 400–409. doi:10.1007/s13280-017-0956-0. - doi:10.1007/s13280-017-0956-0
Theocharis, D., Rodrigues, V. S., Pettit, S., and Haider, J. (2019). Feasibility of the Northern Sea Route: the role of distance, fuel prices, ice breaking fees and ship size for the product tanker market. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 129, 111–135. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.07.003. - doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.07.003
Topaj, A. G., Tarovik, O. V., Bakharev, A. A., and Kondratenko, A. A. (2019). Optimal ice routing of a ship with icebreaker assistance. Applied Ocean Research, 86, 177–187. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2019.02.021. - doi:10.1016/j.apor.2019.02.021
Wu, A., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., and Li, X. (2022). RouteView: an intelligent route planning system for ships sailing in the Arctic. International Journal of Digital Earth, 15(1), 2216–2237. doi:10.1080/17538947.2022.2126016. - doi:10.1080/17538947.2022.2126016
Citation note:
Mohamed A., Hu X.: Bathymetry- and Sea-Ice-Constrained Feasibility Screening for Trans-Arctic Navigation. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 20, No. 3, doi:10.12716/1001.20.03.02, pp. 539-545, 2026
Authors in other databases:


60150066700
DnEJgKIAAAAJ