105
1 INTRODUCTION
Worldwideshippingindustryisapproachingtheend
of ECDIS implementation process on board ships.
Unlike the other aspects of vessels operation
proceduresinstructionsrelatedtoECDISarenotfully
established what often creates uncertainty especially
when the vessel is about to undergo vetting
inspection.
Inadditiontoother
inspectionsandauditstanker
vessels are subjected to be assessed by OCIMF Ship
InspectionReportingProgramme.TheOilCompanies
International Marine Forum (OCIMF) is a voluntary
associationofoilcompanieshavinganinterestinthe
shipmentoftankers[9].OCIMFformationcommence
in 1970 when major oil companies bond together
to
attain stronger influence in the international rules
formingprocess.Asfortoday(2016)94membersare
part of OCIMF. Wide experience in hydrocarbons
transport is an excellent foundation for professional
guidelines published by OCIMF. Even though those
guidelines are only recommendations not the
international rules they tend to set worldwide
standards for tanker shipping industry. Besides
extensive list of publications OCIMF has built a
database of worldwide tanker fleet which consist
detailed reports with regards to safety management
systems.ShipInspection Report Programme (SIRE)
was established in 1993 and more than 180000
inspection reports have been prepared since then.
SIRE
database is a great tool for ship operators in
process of selecting particular tanker for charter.
PositiveresultofSIREinspectionisaclearindication
thatvessel iswellmaintainedinaccordancetosafety
international standards. SIRE examiners use the
specificguidelinesforcarryingoutinspections.Those
guidelines named Vessel Particulars
Questionnaire
(VPQ)andVesselInspectionQuestionnaire(VIQ)are
set of questions to be answered during inspection.
Each question has a background in commonly
recognized rules; for instance SOLAS, IGC Code,
Bridge Procedures Guide, FSS Code, LSA Code,
MARPOL, IMDG Code.Direct references leave
Position Cross-Checking on ECDIS in View of
International Regulations Requirements and OCIMF
Recommendations
W.Legieć
GdyniaMaritimeUniversity,Gdynia,Poland
ABSTRACT:Inthispaperauthorsuggestmethodsforpositioncross checkingonmodernbridgeequippedwith
ECDIS. Terrestrial navigation techniques in relation to newly implemented technology are adopted to fulfil
internationalrequirementsandrecommendations.Authorproposesvoyagerecordingproceduresconforming
to IMO requirements ready to be
used as navigational procedures in Safety Management System. Vessel
InspectionQuestionnaireofShipInspectionReportProgramme isusedtosystematizetheneeds.Differencesin
approachbetweenpaperchartsandECDISnavigationareexposedandclarifiedservingasa guideforships
liable to undergo vetting inspection. Author shows both, advantages
and weak points of various ECDIS
featuresusingasanexampleECDISmanufacturedbyJapanRadioCompany.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 10
Number 1
March 2016
DOI:10.12716/1001.10.01.12
106
almost no room for individual often subjective
inspector interpretation. At present ECDIS related
procedures are not completely settled what causes
frequentconfusionsaboutitsusage.Itisaninterestof
all parties involved to agree on international
standardsandproceduresforECDISservice.
2 POSITIONFIXANDPOSITIONCROSSCHECK
ECDIS introduction changed the view at position
fixingon boardmodernships.Besideother benefits,
unlikewithpaper charts navigationOOW canfocus
onthenavigationalsituationwithoutinterruptionfor
continuous position plotting. GNSS derived position
(usually GPS) is unceasingly plotted on the ECDIS
screenandthe wholesystem is
basedonnumber of
sensorswhichmustbecrosscheckedbyothermeans
tokeepthe shipon the safeside [7].ECDISused in
conjunctionwith traditionalnavigation methodslike
visual, radar, and celestial observations gives an
overallperceptionofthecurrentsituation[11].
It is an imperative to understand
the difference
between position fixing and position crosschecking
definitions. When paper charts were in use position
fixing term apply as it was plotted on the chart
manually by OOW. Position coordinates were
obtained from GPS, radar or by visual observations
and then plotted on the paper chart by
navigating
officer. Situation was pretty straightforward: fix
position and plot it on the chart. Nowadays when
working with ECDIS ship’s position is fixed and
plotted on the chart continuously and OOW is
responsible for crosschecking of position derived
fromGNSSreceiver.
2.1 Positioncrosscheckintervals
Whenusingpaper
chartstermpositionfixing interval
meanthowoften positionshouldhave to be plotted
manually on the paper chart by OOW. Additionally
therewasarequirementforconfirmingGPSderived
position accuracy by use of other position fixing
methodsatintervalsfrequentenoughnotrunintothe
danger in the
time between fixes. At present, while
usingECDISpositionfixintervaldefinitiondoesnot
applyasfixing isalreadydoneandpositionisplotted
unceasingly. Today we can say only about position
crosscheckinginterval.
Table1.Positionfixingandcrosscheckingintervals
_______________________________________________
GPSderivedVisual,radar,
positioncelestial,position
_______________________________________________
Plotting  Required Plotting Required
method intervalmethodinterval
_______________________________________________
Paper Plotted Vesselcannot
charts manually runintoPlotted
byOOW dangerduring manuallyNot
ECDIS Plotted theinterval byspecified
Automaticallybetweenfixes OOW
byECDIS
_______________________________________________
Evaluating question no. 4.26 in OCIMF Vessel
Inspection Questionnaire itcanbe seen that interval
forGPSposition crosscheckingbyother methods is
not precisely identified. It says that “At least two
methods of position fixing should be charted, where
possible.Visualandradarpositionfixingandmonitoring
techniques should be used whenever possible. GPS
derivedpositionsshouldalwaysbeverifiedbyalternative
methods” [8]. It is essential to specify position cross
checkingintervalswithinNavigationalProceduresin
Safety Management System [13]. Let’s study an
exampleextractedfromoneofthemajoroilshipping
companies’navigationalprocedures.Whilstthevessel
wasontheopenoceanthepositionfixingintervalset
by company policy was
one hour. This interval
decreased gradually as the vessel approaches the
land.Whennavigatinginconfinedwaterswithpilot
onboardtheintervalforpositionfixingwasseton3
minutes. Asaresultnavigating officer was required
toplotthe positionmanually(using mixed methods
GPS,visualorradar)
atveryshortintervalsinorder
tonavigatesafelyandconformtoSafetyManagement
System procedures.Situation becomes unsafe
especiallyduringnighttimewhenofficerwasforced
to be a multitasker and focus in the same time on
collision avoidance, monitoring the helmsman
responseonpilot’s orders, reportingtoVTS stations
and other duties. OOW was constantly shifting
betweenthechartroomandconningpositiontesting
his rapid eye accommodation skills. In order to
supportbridgeteamitwasquitecommontoengage
anotherofficerjustforpositionplottingbutitleadsto
work/rest hour’s issues when arriving in port. SIRE
inspectors are very sensitive about hours of rest
regulationsandstudying VIQquestionno.4.9itcan
be noted that bridge manning is underlined there
Inspectorsmusttakeintoaccounttheimpactofadditional
bridgemanningupontheworkloadofanyindividualand
impact of hours of rest regulations”
[8]. ECDIS
introduction changed this ridiculous situation and
improved safety of navigation significantly. OOW
finallycanfocusonthenavigationalsituationhaving
advantage of real time position plotting on ECDIS
display. What remains to be specified is a position
crosscheckinterval.Itisquitecommonthatposition
crosschecking intervals
are simply copied from
previous position fixing interval requirements
applicable for paper chart navigation. Lack of
understanding of ECDIS system and advantages
which comes with it leads to dangerous situation
whennavigatingofficerisrequiredtocrosscheckhis
GPSpositionatabsurdintervals.Onceagain,position
fixintervaland
position crosscheck intervalarenot
thesamethings.MaingoalofECDISintroductionon
board the vessels was to lessen the workload and
improve navigation safety. GNSS derived position
must be checked‐no question about it, but cross
checking it every 3 minutes is like moving back to
papercharts
age.Itisfutiletokeepcontinuousdouble
positonmonitoring.IfGNSSisnottobetrustedfora
fewminutesthenwhatisthepointofusingECDIS.
Asaconclusion,thelastsentenceinVIQquestion
no.4.26The frequency of positionfixing should be such
thatthe
vesselcannotrunintodangerduringtheinterval
between fixes [8] is always satisfied while working
withECDISasthepositionisfixedcontinuouslyand
the distance passed between fixes is always lesser
thanthedistancetotheclosestdanger.
107
3 VOYAGEPLANSTAGES
Question no. 4.25 in SIRE Vessel Inspection
Questionnaireisa bittricky.Itstates“Thefollowing
shouldbemarkedonthechart,where itenhancessafe
navigation: (…) Methods and frequency of position
fixing; (…) In the event that ECDIS is the primary
meansofnavigation,
theaboveshouldbetakeninto
account”[8].
ForECDISuserstermshouldbeisdegradedbythe
expression should be taken into account. It means that
elementsofpassageplanrequiredonthepapercharts
arenotexactlythesameasthoserequiredforpassage
plan prepared on ECDIS.
For instance methods and
frequencyofpositionfixingmarkingscannotbedone
inthesamewayonelectronicandpapercharts.While
usingpaperchartspositionfixingmarkingprocedure
is well known to everyone and does not require
furtherexplanation.OnECDISwheredisplayedchart
scale is often changed sentence
should be repeated
endlesstimesinoneareainordertobevisibleatall
times.Constantlyrepeatedinformationaboutposition
crosscheckfrequencyanditsmethodscanresultwith
cluttered chart picture therefore it is necessary to
solvethisissueinadifferentway.Oneofthemethods
is to
split the route into the segments (Open Sea
Navigation, Coastal Navigation and Confined
Waters) and assign them with clear instructions in
regardstofrequency andmethodsofpositioncross
checking[5].
3.1 OpenSeaNavigation‐definitionandmethodsfor
shippositionchecks
OpenSeaNavigationcouldbedefinedaspart
ofthe
shipsvoyageplanwherenolandisinvicinity[5].At
thisstageshipspositionisobtainedwithuseofGPS
andcouldbeconfirmedeitherbyCelestialFixesorby
comparisonbetweenGPSreceivers.ECDISuserswill
takeanadvantageofhavingtwoGPSreceiverswhat
is required
by IMO on every vessel equipped with
twoindependentECDISstations[3].
3.2 CoastalNavigation‐definitionandmethodsofship
positionchecks
Coastal Navigation definition apply for the areas
where vessel is closer to shore and radar or visual
objects are available for GPS position crosscheck.
When navigating in coastal waters OOW duty is to
employ Radar Overlay feature and terrestrial
navigation
position fixing methods to confirm
accuracy of positions derived from GNSS plotted
automaticallyonECDIS[11].Inaddition,comparison
betweentwoGPSreceiversshouldbeperformedwith
useofthesamemethodsasforOpenSeaNavigation;
that means secondary position symbol or secondary
trackdisplayshouldbeenabledas
wellasdifference
betweenpositionsalarm.
3.3 ConfinedWaters‐definitionandmethodsofship
positionchecks
Confined Waters or Pilotage Waters is a part of
voyage pla n where ship is in the area of shallow
watershavinglimitedroomtonavigate.
Confinedwatersexamples:
Canals
Locksystems
Rivers
leadingtoport
Confinedareasamongislandsandreefs
Waterways
TrafficSeparationSchemes
Bays
Harbors
Portapproaches
There is no rigid distinction between coastal and
confinedwatersandthelimitsofthosearetobesetby
NavigatingOfficerwhilepreparingthePassagePlan.
Since the utmost accuracy is essential throughout
Confined Waters navigation, position crosscheck
frequencyshouldbegraduallyincreased[10].
3.4 Voyageplanstages‐methodsofship’spositionchecks
‐summary
Table2.Positioncrosscheckingsummary
_______________________________________________
Voyage VisualCalculated GPSposition GPSposition
Plan comparison comparison accuracy accuracy
stage between betweenconfirmedby confirmedby
twoGPS twoGPS Visual/Radar RadarOverlay
receivers receivers observation
_______________________________________________
Ocean YES YES NONO
Navigation
Coastal YES YES YESYES
Navigation
Confined YES YES YESYES
Waters
_______________________________________________
4 POSITIONCROSSCHECKMETHODS
4.1 Visualcomparisonbetweentwogpsreceivers
GPS positions could be compared visually or by
calculating the difference between indicated co
ordinates.Secondarypositionsourcesymbolmustbe
displayedontheJRCECDISscreeninordertocheck
visually that positions derived from two GPS
receiversmatcheachother.Othermanufacturers(i.e.
Furuno) provide the function of displaying primary
andsecondarypasttracks.WithbothsystemsOOWis
abletoseeatglancethatGPSpositionscorrelatesby
confirmingthateither symbolsor tracksseenonthe
displayoverlapeachother.
108
Figure1. Secondary position symbol not displayed on the
chart
Figure2.Secondarypositionsymboldisplayedonthechart
Figure3.Twopositionsymbolsinpropercorrelation
Figure4.Positionsymbolsnotcorrelated
4.2 Calculatedcomparisonbetweentwogpsreceivers
Mathematical comparison between coordinates
derived from two GPS receivers is performed
unceasingly by ECDIS. OOW is warned by audio
visualindicationeverytimewhendifferencebetween
positionsexceedspresetvalue.
109
Figure5. ECDIS alarm triggered by excess difference
betweenpositions
4.3 RadarOverlay
Radar Information Overlay (RIO) superimposed on
ECDIS screen is one of the techniques satisfying
necessity for GPS position crosscheck when
navigatingwithinCoastalorConfinedWaters.Beside
of GPS position accuracy check RIO offers another
advantageous feature that is sensor check. RIO is
recognized by British Admiralty
as the most
immediate indicator of system accuracy [11]. When
radaroverlaymatcheschartedfeaturesdisplayed on
ECDIS screen it means that sensors connected to
ECDISworksproperly.Whenradar pictureoverlaid
onECDISdoesnotmatchchartedcoastlinethereisno
reason for panic and immediate doubts in sensors
accuracy.Officersneedtobearinmindlimitationsof
radars.Firstlycoastlinereflectionsgeneratedatsharp
angles appear further from shore that they actually
are and therefore best interpretation gives a picture
observedatrightangles.Secondly,radarreflectionis
dependable on coastline characteristic. Charted flat
desert coastline will generate poor
reflection and
rockycliffswillgivestrongandevidentechoes[2].
Figure6.RadarOverlaynotalignedwithdisplayedchart
Figure7.RadarOverlaynotalignedwithdisplayedchart
Figure8.RadarOverlaynotalignedwithdisplayedchart
Figure9. Radar Overlay correctly aligned with displayed
chart
Figure10. Radar Overlay correctlyaligned with displayed
chart
Itisessentialtoadjustdisplayedradarpictureas
to not clutter presented chart data. Incorrectly
adjusted radar overlay reduces navigation safety
insteadof improvingit[12].ECDISprovidefeatures
ofvarioussettingmodificationstoradaroverlay.
JRC ECDIS offers following functions related to
RadarOverlay:
RadarOverlaytransparencyadjustment
Radaroverlaycolorpatternadjustment
Rangeringsdisplay
Bearingscaledisplay
Gainadjustment
Seaclutteradjustment
Rainclutteradjustment
110
Figure11. Radar overlay color pattern example on JRC
ECDIS
Figure12. Radar overlay color pattern example on JRC
ECDIS
Figure13.RadarOverlaysettingsonJRCECDIS
Figure14 Range rings and bearing scale enabled on JRC
ECDIS
4.4 TerrestrialnavigationtechniquesapplicationforGPS
positioncrosscheck
InadditiontoRadarOverlayfunctiontherearethree
different methods to confirm accuracy of GPS
positionwhilenavigatingwithinCoastalorConfined
WatersbyfixingobservedpositiononJRCECDIS:
VisualorradarpositionfixwithuseofEBL,
VRM
features
Visual or radar position fix with use of Cross
bearingsfunction
Visual or radar position fix with use of LOP
function
The whole idea is to combine two methods:
traditional terrestrial navigation and newly adopted
ECDISfunctions.Fixclassicalobservedpositionwith
useofnewtechnology.
4.4.1 ObservedpositionfixwithuseofEBL,VRM
features
ItisthesimplestwaytocrosscheckGPSposition
while navigating with ECDIS. Besides visual
confirmation, JRC ECDIS calculates position at the
intersectionofEBL/VRM.Uptofourlinesofposition
can be used with that method; it gives plenty
of
combinationstofixpositionmanually.
PositionfromtwoLOPs:
Bearing&distance
Bearing#1&bearing#2
Distance#1&distance#2
PositionfromthreeLOPs:
Bearing#1&distance#1+distance#2
Bearing#1&distance#1+bearing#2
PositionfromfourLOPs:
Bearing#1&distance#1+bearing#2&distance#2
Crosschecking GPS position with use of
EBL/VRM is very simple and the procedure is as
follows:
Obtainbearinganddistancefromfirstradarmark
(twoLOPs)
Obtain second distance to achieve more accurate
position(thirdLOP)
TransferthemtoECDISbyEBLandVRMs
Compare association
between GPS position
symbol and position obtained from transferred
radar data. Ensure that positions overlap each
other.
Compare association between GPS position co
ordinates and position obtained from transferred
radar data. Position at the intersection of first
bearing and distance is automatically calculated
and displayed on the screen (marked
with red
frameonexamplepicture)
Push“Option”buttontomakeascreenshot
GPS position has been crosschecked by radar
observation, results were saved in HDD and can
becopiedtoanyothercomputer
111
Figure15.ObservedpositionplottedwithuseofEBL/VRM
onJRCECDIS
4.4.2 observedpositionfixwithuseofcrossbearings
function
This method requires more time but unlike the
previoustechniquewithEBL/VRMitofferspossibility
tofixthepositionbymorethanfourlinesofposition.
Up to ten cross bearings can be plotted in the same
time. Again, screenshot should
be saved for voyage
recording purposes. This method is useful in some
specificinstanceslikefixingpositionfromthreevisual
bearings. Cross Bearing function allows for visual
comparison only. Coordinates visible on below
screenindicatebearingstartingposition.
Figure16. Observed position plotted by Cross Bearing
functiononJRCECDIS
4.4.3 ObservedpositionfixwithuseofLOPfunction
That is more sophisticated method of manual
positionfixing onECDISvaluable whenGPS failure
occurs. It enables to set a reference point used for
Dead Reckoning. Reference point function causes
own ship position to shift and therefore it is not
recommended
by manufacturer to be used while
navigating with properly functioning GPS receiver
[1]. Reference point details are saved within ECDIS
electroniclogbookandcanbeassessedatanytime.
Figure16.ObservedpositionfixedonJRCECDISwithuse
ofLOPfunction
Figure17. Reference point saved in electronic logbook on
JRCECDIS
Figure18. Reference point details saved in electronic
logbookonJRCECDIS
Figure19. Ships’ position shifted by LOP function on JRC
ECDIS
112
5 VOYAGERECORDS
Regulation 28 in Chapter V of SOLAS Convention
obliges vessels to maintain detailed record of
navigational activities in order to enable complete
voyagereview[6].Paragraphs4.23 and4.26ofSIRE
Vessel Inspection Questionnaire go even further
specifyingitemstoberecorded.Oneofthepoints is
to keep complete record of GPS positions cross
checkedbyotherposition fixing method during last
voyage [8]. To satisfy this requirement series of
screenshotscanbesavedonECDISHDD.Itisagood
idea to set “screenshot” function under
programmableoptionbuttonasitwillreducethetime
required for this simple operation. Saving a
screenshotontheECDISharddriveisanefficientand
easiestwayofrecordingouractions.Itcanserveasa
proof for GPS position crosschecking utilizing
observed position fixing, for use of Radar Overlay
when in coastal and confined waters, use of
proper
safetycontoursettingsetc.IMOresolutionA.916(22)
requirements are satisfied as it clearly states that
voyagerecordingshouldbepermanent,handwritten,
electronicormechanical.
Furthermore, there is another advantage of
makingscreenshotsthroughthevoyage.Inthatway
we built a history of previously maiden trips, for
instance
if vessel is about to arrive at Ras Laffan
waitinganchorageandbridgeteamisnotsureabout
thecongestionintheareaitwouldbeveryconvenient
tocheckscreenshotsrecordedfrompreviousvoyage.
The last advantage is more psychological than
practical. It is a great tool against negligence.
Anybody
who saves a picture of his ECDIS display
willunconsciouslycaretohaveitincorrectstate.That
is the way to make sure that Radar Overlay will be
enabled inample time, that safety vector and sector
will be set properly etc. Before ECDIS introduction
seafarerswerecollectingbunch
ofpapersinorderto
complywithvoyagehistory reviewrequirement.At
present shipping is in transition period and
incorporationofbothmethodsisobserved.Weusean
ECDIS to record past positions but still equipment
suchascourserecorder,echosounderprinter,engine
telegraphloggerareinuse.Itis
highlypossiblethatin
the nearest future when ECDIS become one of the
most important navigational tools on the bridge, all
this additional gear won’t exist anymore as it’ll be
replaced by electronically saved digital data. The
main advantage of data saved within electronic log
bookisthatinformationis
easilyreferencedtoships
positionontheelectronicchart.
With respect to position crosschecking records
required by IMO following procedure could be
applied. During Open Sea Navigation stage
screenshot to be saved on the ECDIS HDD every
hour. Saved screen will proof that comparison
between two GPS receivers was done
by visual and
calculatedmethods.Additionallyitcouldbeseenthat
Safety Vector and Sector settings complies with
applied Management Card. During Coastal and
Confined Waters Navigation stages when Radar
Overlay is superimposed on chart and navigating
officer is required to use visual/radar marks for
position crosschecking, screenshot can
be saved
every fifteen minutes. As mentioned before Radar
Overlay is recognized as the best tool for sensors
accuracy check, therefore OOW can use this handy
feature in combination with visual/radar position
fixes. With screen saving schedule shown in below
table navigating officer is required to fix observed
positioneveryhalfanhour.
Table3.Screensavingschedule
_______________________________________________
TIMESAVEDSCREEN
_______________________________________________
12:00 GPSaccuracycrosscheckedbyobservedposition
12:15 GPSaccuracycrosscheckedbyRadarOverlay
(evidencethatitmatcheschartedfeatures)
12:30 GPSaccuracycrosscheckedbyobservedposition
12:45 GPSaccuracycrosscheckedbyRadarOverlay
(evidencethatitmatcheschartedfeatures)
13:00 GPSaccuracycrosscheckedby
observedposition
13:15 GPSaccuracycrosscheckedbyRadarOverlay
(evidencethatitmatcheschartedfeatures)
_______________________________________________
Atpresentthereisanoticeablytrendofreducing
timebetweencrosscheckbyradar/visualfixesdown
toridiculousintervalsofafewminutes.Professionals
responsible for company navigational procedures
preparation claims that shorter interval between
crosscheck fixes will keepOOWalert.Better give a
can of red bull for
those sleepwalkers instead of
validating odd rules applicable for whole shipping
industry.ECDISasalltheothernavigationalsystems
require frequent checks but it is against the whole
ideaof itsimplementationto confirmitsaccuracy at
absurdfrequency.Same as withGPSreceiversthere
aretwogyrocompassesinstalledon
thebridge.Dowe
check gyroerror every five minutes? It is not
necessarybecause onceitsaccuracy isconfirmedwe
put a trust on it and just monitor for any abnormal
behaviour.
Worldwide shipping is in the time then ECDIS
related procedures are settled. If rules would be
preparedwith
commonsensetheywon’trequiretobe
changed within next years of ECDIS service and
won’t create headache to OOW working with it.
ECDISisveryhandytoolbutit’seasytoexaggerate
newly adopted procedures and end up in the
situation where bridge team workload increases
insteadofbeing
reduced.Navigationofficerroleisto
navigatenottocarryonconstanttestsonnavigational
equipment.
Example(partofVoyagePlan):
“Our route is divided into three areas: Open Sea (far
distance from shore, unrestricted speed), Coastal Waters
(areas closer to shore, unrestricted speed) and Confined
Waters(areaswhereSafetyContour
ismarkedmanuallyon
the charts, speed restricted by squat and allowable UKC).
Limits of those areas are marked on the charts. Follow
belowprocedures.
OPENSEANAVIGATION
Usechartsetting:“OpenSea”
Savescreenevery1hr
ConfirmGNSSpositionbyCelestialobservations
Use autopilot “economy”
mode, engage hand steering
whenrequired
Noteinlogbooktimeswhenhandsteering/autopilot
areengaged
ECDIS to be set as per Open Sea Navigation
ManagementCard
113
COASTALNAVIGATION
ConfirmGNSSaccuracybyRadarorVisualfixatleast
every30min
Usechartsetting:“Coastal”
Savescreenevery15mins
SetRadarOverlayonECDIS/notetimeinlogbook
At least every 15mins confirm alignment of Radar
OverlayagainstENCdisplayed
Use Parallel Indexing Technique to monitor ship’s
movement
Useautopilot“precision1”mode,engagehandsteering
whenrequired
NoteinlogbooktimeswhenpassingVTSsectors
Noteinlogbooktimeswhenhandsteering/autopilot
isengaged
ECDIS to be set as per Coastal Navigation
ManagementCard
CONFINEDWATERS
ConfirmGNSSaccuracybyRadarorVisualfixatleast
every30min
Usechartsetting:“Confined”
Savescreenevery15mins
SafetyContourismarkedonchartsbyLimitingDanger
Lines
At least every 15mins confirm alignment of Radar
OverlayagainstENCdisplayed
Use Parallel Indexing Technique to monitor ship’s
movement
Useautopilot“precision2”mode,engagehandsteering
whenrequired
NoteinlogbooktimeswhenpassingVTSsectors
Noteinlogbooktimeswhenhandsteering/autopilot
isengaged
ECDIS to beset as per Confined Waters
Management
Card”
6 CONCLUSIONS
While preparing this paper I was looking for a
solutionwhichcanbeadoptedonallECDISsystems
irrespectiveofmanufacturer.OneECDISisequipped
withuserfriendlyLOP creator,another one hasthis
function so complicated and not user friendly that
drawinganylineofposition
requiresmoretimeand
attention. All ECDIS systems though are equipped
withEBLandVRMwhatisrequiredbyInternational
RegulationssetinECDISPerformanceStandards[3].
ThatiswhyIfocusmostlyonthismethod.Moreover,
EBL and VRMs are used every day by officers and
they have no
problems at all in quick and efficient
operationwithuseofthosefunctions.ECDISisnota
new system. Even more it is hard to imagine for
youngseafarersthatmonitoringoftheshipsposition
could be performed not in realtime likewise with
electronic charts. Electronic aspects which are
very
similartothosewellknownfromcomputergamesare
very easy to be adopted by young adepts. Officers,
who experienced working on paper charts and all
tasksrelatedtoit,willappreciatethemostnewtech
solutions and see positive difference in navigation
officerworkloadreduction. Looking upfor
allthose
changesitcanbestatedthatnewgeneration officers
became more computer players than navigators. All
right, thereisa risk that we allbecomeplaystation
playersunlessit’llbeclearthatthisisstillashipwith
humanlivesonit,wheregameovermeansreallyover
andthereisnorestartbutton.
LITERATURE
[1]ECDIS JRC JAN901B Instruction Manual, Japan Radio
CompanyLtd.,2013.
[2]Fadeev V., Radar Overlay to improve ECDIS
[http://www.maritimeexecutive.com/article/Radar
OverlaytoImproveECDISNavigation20140912],The
MaritimeExecutive,2014.
[3]IMOMSC.232(82),AdoptionoftherevisedPerformance
StandardsforElectronicChartDisplayandInformation
Systems (ECDIS),
International Maritime Organization,
London,8December2006.
[4]IMO, MSC.282(86), Adoption of amendments to the
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea,
1974,asamended,InternationalMaritimeOrganization,
London,5June2009.
[5]Instone M., ECDIS Procedures Guide, Witherby
PublishingGroupLtd,Edinburgh2012.
[6]International Convention for
the Safety of Life at Sea,
InternationalMaritimeOrganisation,London,2014.
[7]MarineGuidanceNote379(MGN379),UseofElectronic
Navigation Aids, Maritime and Coastguard Agency
(MCA),Southampton,2008.
[8]Ship Inspection Report (SIRE) Programme, Vessel
InspectionQuestionnaires forOilTankers,Combination
Carriers, Shutle Tankers, Chemical Tankers and Gas
Tankers
(VIQ 6), Oil Companies International Marine
Forum,2016.
[9]Tanker Management and SelfAssessment 2, Oil
Companies International Marine Forum, Witherby
PublishingGroupLtd,Edinburgh2012.
[10]The American Practical Navigator, National Imagery
andMappingAgency,Bethesda,Maryland,2002.
[11]UKHO NP232, Admiralty Guide to ECDIS
Implementation. Policy and Procedures,
1 st Edition,
UnitedKingdomHydrographicOffice,Taunton2014.
[12]Weintrit A., Radar Image Overlay in ECDIS Display
VersusElectronicNavigationalChartOverlayonRadar
Screen, Prace Wydziału Nawigacyjnego, nr 22, Gdynia
2008.
[13]Weintrit A., The Electronic Chart Display and
Information System (ECDIS). An Operational
Handbook, A Balkema Book,
CRC Press, Taylor &
Francis Group, Boca Raton London New York
Leiden2009..