13
middle section of the port (5.1‐ 6.6% Wiślane and
Węglowe Quays) was observed, but sediments from
Ziółkowskiego,OliwskiegoQuaysandNorthernPort
havebeenenriched incoarserfractionsanddepleted
of fine ones (Radke et al., 2008) (Fig.1). Sediments
originating from the latter location are subjected to
spring flooding of Motława which stimulates the
washing‐out of fine fract
ions and their transport in
thedirectionoftheWiślaneQuay.Thisphenomenon
is the most likely cause of the low content of fine
fractions by the Szczecińskie Quay and the high
content by the Wiślane Quay (Bolałek et al., 2006;
Radkeetal.,2008;Pustelnikovasetal.,2005,2008).On
the other hand, the area close to the Vist
ula river
mouth(Ziółkowskiego Quay) ischaracterized by the
influence of marine waters. Such location stimulates
the transport of fine ‐grainedfractions from the river
mouthtowa
rdsthegulf.Incomparisontothesamples
from the Port of Gdańsk, samples from the Port of
Gdynia presented higherpercentage offinefractions
(between 36.8 and 76.9%) (Table 2). This reflects the
highly sorptive properties of silt and clay (Langston
andPope,1995;Hoch,2001).Moreover,theobtained
resultsofthermogravimetricanalysis(TGA)(Radkeet
al., 2008) indicat
ed the existence of kaolinite and
biogenic minerals (carbonates) in the samples from
this region. Such sediment compositions give rise to
conditionsthatarefavourabletotheaccumulationof
any chemical substances including metals and
organotincompounds.AlthoughthePortofGdyni
ais
protected year‐round by the outer breakwater (2.5
km), which prevents mixing from currents or high
waves in the port, during sustained strong westerly
windsthewaterlevelcanrisebyupto0.6mandcan
decreaseduringstrongeasterlywindsbyasmuchas
0.6 m. This phenomenon ma
y cause intensive
movementofwater massandsedimentsintotheport
channel and consequently lead to direct and
consistent distribution of sediment materials toward
individual docks. In this particular instance the
largest percentage of fine fraction (43.2‐76.9%) was
found in sedimentsamples fromthe stations located
inthesectionsoftheportfurt
hestfromthesea(docks
VI, VII and VIII). The sediments from the docks
locatedin themiddlesection of the port (IV, V) and
itsimmediatevicinity(III)containedlessclayandsilt
(36.8‐38.5%)andmoresand(61.5‐63.2%)(Radkeetal.,
2010,2012a,b
).Itshouldbementionedthatindividual
docks ofthe Port of Gdynia provide easier access to
the water mass from the sea, in comparison to the
quays from the inner Port of Gdańsk, which are
mostlyaffected by theriver. Taking intoaccountthe
above details it may be assumed tha
t storms and
winds may play the main natural role in the
formationofsedimentation,aswellasthetransportof
watermassinthePortofGdyniachannel.
2.2 Influenceoftheareasubjecttotheseainfluenceand
thearearelatedwiththelandonthedistributionof
chemicalsubstancesinharbours
A significant fact
or conditioning the distribution of
chemical substances in sedimentation in harbour
areas are the increased erosion phenomena related
with ships movement in the harbour and dredging
works. In the discussed ports, however, we can
differentiate between two areas responsible for the
distributionofchemicalsubstancesinsedimentation:
the area subject to the influence of the sea and the
area tha
t is strictly related with the land and the
anthropogenic influence (Table 2). A geochemical
barrier(Pustelnikovasetal.,2005,2008)thatisformed
asaresultoffreshwater(fromtheriver)cominginto
contact with saline water (from the sea), as well as
storm surges and the distance from the sea mouth,
ma
y have a significant influence on this kind of
distribution of chemical substances. A geochemical
barrierisespeciallyemphasizedinthecaseofthePort
of Gdańsk where there is a strong inflow of fresh
water originat
ing from the Motława to the port
channel.Majewski(1972)estimatedthattheinflowof
fresh water to the Vistula River basin (the longest
river in Poland, introducing the largest amount of
water mass to the Gulf of Gdańsk of the Baltic Sea)
mostly originat
es from the Motława River
(approximately 87.0%), while the Dead Vistula river
on its own contributes very little – approximately
0.99%. In the case of the Port of Gdynia the local
inflow of underground fresh water from the
Chylonkariverismuchlesssignificant.Althoughthe
watercourse may locally form a geochemical barrier
(proba
bly within the area of dock VII) it seems that
the zonation in the port is caused by storm surges,
whose inflows may even reach basin V (large
amountsofclams,shells,coarse‐grainedmaterialand
a smaller share of clay fraction and organic matter
were found in the sediment samples in comparison
withba
sinsVI,VIIandVIII).
Table2. Division of the Port of Gdynia and the Port of
Gdańskareasintozonesof theseaandthelandinfluence,
considering the organic matter, as well as the fine and
coarse‐grainedfractionvalues.
Port Port area Coarse
fraction
(>0.063
mm
Fine
fraction
(<0.063
mm
Organic
matter
(%)
PortofGdańsk
Seainfluence
NorthernPort 96.2% 3.8 1.9
OliwskieQua
98.1 1.9 0.9
SiarkoweQua
96.1 3.9 1.9
Ziółkowskiego
Qua
96.7 3.3 2.0
Land
influence
Wę
loweQua
94.9 5.1 4.9
WiślaneQua
93.4 6.6 6.8
Szczecińskie
Qua
95.9 4.1 1.8
PortofGd
nia
Dock
Sea
influence
III 61.5 38.5 3.1
IV 63.2 36.8 3.9
V 62.5 37.5 0.8
Land
influence
VI 23.1 76.9 7.4
VII 56.8 43.2 5.0
VIII 24.2 75.8 7.6
The regularities presented ab
ove can be easily
observed in relation to all the results (granulometric
analysis, results of metal and organotin derivatives
content)obtainedforsamplescollectedfromthePort
of Gdańsk. A similar analysis of sediments samples
from the Port of Gdynia does not pose many