International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 5
Number 1
March 2011
121
1 INTRODUCTION
The beginning of the marine communications at dis-
tance born with the use of the telegraphy without
threads, the localization of a ship was based on
warnings transmitted by the sailors or automatic ma-
chines. The effectiveness of these systems was
demonstrated in the rescue services and salvage of
human lives, during more than a century. Currently
the security of a ship would be reduced, if enters its
systems don't have some able to indicate its position,
providing the necessary data with the objective to
beginning a rescue in the event of emergency or ca-
tastrophe.
In the XX century, the marine transport began to
introduce a new aid system, the Global Maritime
Distress Safety System (GMDSS), based in the au-
tomatic alarms through communications for satel-
lites and the radiobeacons use that transmit data that
help to the localization of a ship.
2 GLOBAL MARITIME DISTRESS SAFETY
SYSTEM (GMDSS)
The Global Maritime Distress Safety System
(GMDSS), it is a group of procedures of security,
devices and communication protocols designed, to
increase the security and to facilitate the sailing and
the rescue of ships in danger.
This system is regulated by the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS),
approved under the auspices of the International
Maritime Organization (IMO), dependent organism
of the UN. It is operative in the merchant ships and
of passage from 1999.
The GMDSS it is composed of satellites and ter-
restrial systems that try to carrying out the following
operations: alerts (including position), search coor-
dination and rescue, localization (positioning), pro-
vision of marine information, general communica-
tions and communications bridge to bridge.
Among the satellites systems are: INMARSAT
and COSPAS-SARSAT and in the terrestrial ones
we find: HF, MF, VHF, AND NAVTEX. The used
communication techniques are: radio, telephony, te-
New Proposal for Search and Rescue in the Sea
I. Padrón Armas
c/ Guaydil No 68 Tamarco, Tegueste, Tenerife, Espana
D. Avila Prats, E. Melón Rodríguez, I. Franquis Vera & J. Á. Rodríguez
Hernández
Dpto. CC y TT de la Navegación (ULL) C/ Padrón Albornoz s/n, S/C
ABSTRACT: Currently the security of a ship would be reduced if among its systems don't have some able to
indicate its position, providing the necessary data to try that the Rescue System begin a rescue in the event of
emergency or catastrophe. Formerly the localization of a ship was based on warnings transmitted by the sail-
ors or automatic systems. The efficiency of these systems was demonstrated in the rescue services and sal-
vage of human lives obtained along more than a century. Since final of the last century the marine transport
introduced a new aid system, the Global Maritime Distress Safety System (GMDSS), based in the automatic
alarms through communications for satellites and the radiobeacons use that transmit data that help to the lo-
calization of a ship.
In this work is sought to characterize some of the systems of satellites more diffused for the localization of aid
signs (INMARSAT, COSPAS-SARSAT), adding the project IRIDIUM for improvement of the search and
rescue, by means of the surveillance from satellites in orbit. A comparison will be established among these
systems, taking parameters like: global covering, emission of false alarms, portability and economic cost, with
the objective of determining the most effective system in case of catastrophes.
122
legraphy of direct impression and digital selective
call [1].
3 SATELLITAL SYSTEMS
When more developed it is a society, more high it is
their demand level in all the fields, especially in the
communications. The systems of communications
by satellites are the answer to this demand. Its privi-
leged location in the space and the absence of obsta-
cles with the users, do that the cellular telephony
concept, extends beyond of any impediment, alt-
hough they are not exempt of such meteorological
inconveniences as the rain, atmospheric humidity,
ice, sunspots, etc. The communications with satellite
way in the ships have supposed the world covering
for the same ones, facilitating to connect with any
telephone of the world in a quick and effective way.
The advantage is that, in all moment it is possible to
know which one it is the necessities of the ship to be
able to aid them, in the event of emergency or catas-
trophe.
3.1 COSPAS-SARSAT
This satellite system was initially developed under a
Memorandum of Understanding among Agencies of
the former USSR, USA, Canada and France, signed
in 1979.
Fig.1. COPAS-SARSAT System Overview.
The mission of the Programme is to provide accu-
rate, timely and reliable distress alert and location
data to help Search and Rescue (SAR) authorities
assist persons in distress. The objective of the Co-
spas-Sarsat System is to reduce, as far as possible,
delays in the provision of distress alerts to SAR ser-
vices, and the time required to locate a person in dis-
tress at sea or on land and provide assistance to that
person, all of which have a direct impact on the
probability of survival. To achieve this objective,
Cospas-Sarsat participants implement, maintain, co-
ordinate and operate a satellite system capable of de-
tecting distress alert transmissions from radio bea-
cons that comply with Cospas-Sarsat specifications
and performance standards, and of determining their
position anywhere on the globe (Fig 1). The distress
alert and location data is provided by Cospas-Sarsat
Participants to the responsible SAR services.
The System is available to maritime and aviation
users and to persons in distress situations. Access is
provided to all States on a non-discriminatory basis,
and is free of charge for the end-user in distress.
The System is composed of:
distress beacons operating at 406 MHz;
SAR payloads on satellites in low-altitude Earth
orbit and in geostationary orbit;
ground receiving stations spread around the
world; and
a network of Mission Control Centres (MCCs) to
distribute distress alert and location information
to SAR authorities, worldwide.
Satellite processing of old analogue technology
beacons that transmit at 121.5 MHz ended on 1
February 2009 [2, 3].
3.2 INMARSAT
The company was originally founded in 1979 as the
International Maritime Satellite Organization (IN-
MARSAT), a not-for-profit international organiza-
tion, set up at the behest of the International Mari-
time Organization (IMO), a United Nations body,
for the purpose of establishing a satellite communi-
cations network for the maritime community. It be-
gan trading in 1982. From the beginning, the acro-
nym "INMARSAT" was used. The intent was to
create a self-financing body which would improve
safety of life at sea. The name was changed to
"International Mobile Satellite Organization" when
it began to provide services to aircraft and portable
users, but the acronym "INMARSAT", was kept.
Aside from its commercial services, INMARSAT
provides global maritime distress and safety services
(GMDSS) to ships and aircraft at no charge, as a
public service (Fig 2).
Fig.2. Inmarsat system communication.
123
Services include traditional voice calls, low-level
data tracking systems, and high-speed Internet and
other data services as well as distress and safety ser-
vices. The most recent of these provides GPRS-type
services at up to 492 kbit/s ways the Broadband
Global Area Network (BGAN) IP satellite modem
the size of a notebook computer. Other services pro-
vide mobile Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) services used by the media for live reporting
on world events via videophone.
Today INMARSAT owns and operates three
global constellations of 11 satellites flying in geo-
synchronous orbit 37,786 km (22,240 statute miles)
above the Earth [4].
3.3 IRIDIUM
Iridium Communications Inc. (formerly Iridium
Satellite LLC) is a company, based in McLean, VA,
United States which operates the Iridium satellite
constellation, a system of 66 active satellites used
for worldwide voice and data communication from
hand-held satellite phones and other transceiver
units (Fig 3). The Iridium network is unique in that it
covers the whole Earth in real time, including poles,
oceans, terrestrial areas and airways.
Fig 3. Iridium System communication.
The company derives its name from the chemical
element iridium. The number of satellites projected
in the early stages of planning was 77, the atomic
number of iridium, evoking the metaphor of 77 elec-
trons orbiting the nucleus [5].
The Iridium system requires 66 active satellites in
orbit to complete its constellation and spare satellites
are kept in-orbit to serve in case of failure. Satellites
are in low-Earth orbit (LEO at a height of approxi-
mately 485 mi (781 km) and inclination of 86.4°.
Orbital velocity of the satellites is approximately
17,000 mph (27,000 km/h) (Fig 4). Satellites com-
municate with neighbouring satellites via K
a
band
inter-satellite links. Each satellite can have four in-
ter-satellite links: two to neighbours fore and aft in
the same orbital plane, and two to satellites in
neighbouring planes to either side. The satellites or-
bit from pole to pole with an orbit of roughly 100
minutes. This design means that there is excellent
satellite visibility and service coverage at the North
and South poles, where there are few customers. The
over-the-pole orbital design produces "seams" where
satellites in counter-rotating planes next to one an-
other are traveling in opposite directions. Cross-
seam inter-satellite link hand-offs would have to
happen very rapidly and cope with large Doppler
shifts; therefore, Iridium supports inter-satellite links
only between satellites orbiting in the same direc-
tion. [7].
Fig 4. Constellation of the Iridium System.
The satellites each contain seven
Motorola/Freescale PowerPC 603E processors run-
ning at roughly 200 MHz, connected by a custom
backplane network. One processor is dedicated to
each cross-link antenna ("HVARC"), and two pro-
cessors ("SVARC"s) are dedicated to satellite con-
trol, one being a spare. Late in the project an extra
processor ("SAC") was added to perform resource
management and phone call processing.
On the ground, Iridium’s network includes gate-
ways in Arizona and Alaska; a satellite network op-
erations center in Virginia; a technical support center
in Arizona; and four tracking, telemetry and control
(TTAC) stations in Canada, Alaska, Norway and Ar-
izona - all interconnected by advanced fiber-optic
and broadband satellite links. As with the satellite
constellation, the ground infrastructure is designed
with resiliency, permitting voice and data traffic, as
well as satellite backhaul data links, to be rerouted
as needed. The U.S. Department of Defense also has
124
its own gateway in Hawaii to support U.S. govern-
ment traffic [5].
The system is being used extensively by the U.S.
Department of Defence through the DoD gateway in
Hawaii. The DoD pays for unlimited access for up to
20,000 users [7].
The commercial gateway in Tempe, Arizona,
provides voice, data, and paging services for com-
mercial customers on a global basis. Typical cus-
tomers include maritime, aviation, government, the
petroleum industry, scientists, and frequent world
travellers.
Iridium satellites are now an essential component
of communications with remote science camps, es-
pecially the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station. As
of December 2006, an array of twelve Iridium mo-
dems was put online, providing continuous data ser-
vices to the station for the first time [7].
Iridium is currently developing, and is expected
to launch beginning in 2015, Iridium NEXT a se-
cond-generation worldwide network of telecommu-
nications satellites, consisting of 66 satellites and six
in-orbit and nine ground spares. These satellites will
incorporate features such as data transmission which
were not emphasized in the original design. The
original plan was to begin launching new satellites
in 2014. Satellites will incorporate additional pay-
load such as cameras and sensors in collaboration
with some customers and partners. Iridium can also
be used to provide a data link to other satellites in
space, enabling command and control of other space
assets regardless of the position of ground stations
and gateways. The constellation will provide L-band
data speeds of up to 1.5 Mbps and High-speed Ka-
Band service of up to 8 Mbps [5, 6, 7].
4 IRIDIUM SYSTEM ADVANTAGES.
1 Iridium system offers a worldwide voice and
data communication from hand-held satellite
phones and other transceiver units from hand-
held satellite phones and other transceiver units,
more complete that Inmarsat system, that not
cover the poles.
2 The IRIDIUM terminals are smaller that the
beacons of the INMARSAT and COPAS-
SARSAT systems, in weight and volume, easy
to place in the harness of a lifeboat vest.
3 The cost of the communication from hand-held
satellite phones services is more economic in
the IRIDIUM system that in the INMARSAT
system.
4 The speed of answer in the Iridium systems is
bigger than the INMARSAT and COPAS-
SARSAT systems.
5 The possibility to have a terminal IRIDIUM in
the harness in the catastrophe event, would al-
low us to transmit the alarm sign, the data of
coordinated and identity of the ship and with
the voice interaction to contrast if it is a real
alarm. This would allow reduced the false
alarms that in the COSPAS-SARSAT system
are very high.
5 CONCLUSION
Today the effectiveness of Global Maritime Distress
Safety System (GMDSS) is questioned, for the bad
management of the system in catastrophes as the
Ferry Al-Salam Bocaccio 98 in the Red Sea in the
2006. It is possible that if the IRIDIUM project ded-
icates several frequencies for the transmission of da-
ta in the event of catastrophe (number of the ship,
position and catastrophe type), as well as centres of
reception of the calls to contrast that the alerts that
take place are true, It is possible that if the IRIDIUM
project dedicates several frequencies for the trans-
mission of data in the event of catastrophe (number
of the ship, position and catastrophe type), as well as
centres of reception of the calls to contrast that the
alerts that take place are true, will be an important
step to improving the security of the human life in
the sea and GMDSS would recover credibility.
REFERENCE.
[1] González Blanco, Ricardo. “Incidencia de las Nuevas
Tecnologías en la Seguridad de los Buques”. Director:
González Pino, Enrique. Universidad Politécnica de
Cataluña, Centro de Documentación del Departamento de
Ciencias e Ingeniaría Náutica, 1999.
[2] Cospas-Sarsat (International Satellite System for Search
and Rescue) “Cospas-Sarsat 1979-2009, a 30-year Success
Story” <http://www.cospas-sarsat.org/>
[3] WordLingo “Cospas-Sarsat” [en línea], 2010
<http://www.worldlingo.com/>
[4] INMARSAT “The mobile satellite company”
<http://www.inmarsat.com/>
[5] IRIDIUM Everywhere <http://www.iridium.com/>
[6] COIT (Colegio Oficial Ingenieros en Telecomunicaciones)
“Iridium: llamando al Planeta Tierra” <http://www.coit.es/>
[7] IRIDIUM. <http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium>