106
1 What is the extent of deployment of the Quality
Standards System (QSS) by JBLFMC according
to the following areas: (1) Mission, Goals and
Objectives, (2) Corporate Plans, (3) Organization
and Management, (4) Internal Control, (5) Hu-
man Resource Administration, (6) Plant and Fa-
cilities, (7) Academic Affairs, (8) Accounting and
Finance
2 What are the implications of the findings to the
Shipping Industry?
2.1 Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
In today’s climate of intensely competitive interna-
tional trade, companies must identify and put into
place mechanisms that will facilitate success in
world markets. Foremost among such mechanisms
is International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) certification. ISO has agreed on a set of
quality assurance and quality management standards
and will certify companies that meet the quality
standards worldwide (Anschutz, 1996).
In Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award,
Anthony C. Fletcher (2004), discussed that hundreds
of thousands of organizations around the world have
pursued the development and registration of their
Quality Management System (QMS) to the Interna-
tional Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9000
series of standards with the perception that this is the
first step in their pursuit of world-class performance.
In the words of Drystad (1994), by sharing and
working together through the total quality systems
approach, the schools can improve and provide bet-
ter learning options to students, thus ensuring a
world-class workforce.
The implementation of the Quality Standards
System in maritime schools in accordance with the
Rules for Quality Standard System is a vital tool in
ensuring that all the requirements of the Standards of
Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW
’78; as amended ’95) are complied with, thus assur-
ing that the Filipino Seafarers shall continue to be
globally competitive (CHED Memorandum, 1998).
Section 35 of Commission on Higher Education
(CHED) Memorandum #51 dated 1997 (Article 13)
(Quality Standards System), provides that “Every
maritime school shall develop and implement a qual-
ity standard system in accordance with the provi-
sions of the policies, standards and guidelines”
(CHED Memorandum, 1997).
Moreover, Section 36 of the same memorandum
informs that “Recognizing that Filipino seafarers
shall be globally competitive in compliance with
1995 amendments to STCW ’78 as amended ‘95 and
other international laws and conventions, the school
facilities, equipment and teaching competencies
shall be upgraded to meet the quality standards.
Owing to the fact that the country’s economy de-
pends heavily on seafarers and the quality of seafar-
ers depends on the quality of graduates that the mari-
time schools produce, the only way of ensuring the
quality of graduates in maritime schools, specifically
in JBLFMC, is to fully implement the QSS.
The JBLFMC took the lead and got certified in
1997, way ahead of the CHED mandate. JBLFMC
was the first in the Philippines and third in the world
to get certified under the Det Norske Veritas (DNV)
Rules for Maritime Academies
(http://jblcfbac.lasaltech.com/jblcf%20system.htm).
It is a guideline providing a systematic structure
to assess the quality standards system of John B.
Lacson Foundation Maritime College.
The context determines that JBLFMC formulated
the Quality Standards System in order to establish
quality management system. Included in the context
is the Det Norske Veritas and Commission on High-
er Education (CHED) that ensures the deployment
and compliance with quality standards.
Moreover, Input evaluation which is based in the
eight (8) areas of Quality Standards System needs
looking into.
Process includes the assessment of the Quality
Standards System and the identification of the
strengths and weaknesses, which was made the ba-
ses for implications to the shipping industry.
3 METHODOLOGY
The participants of this study were the total popula-
tion of 175 which includes the faculty members and
administrative staff of JBLFMC in the Philippines.
A descriptive quantitative and qualitative research
was employed to conduct this study.
This investigation utilized a modified research in-
strument adopted from the study of Magramo
(2003). It was based on the Quality Standards writ-
ten in the Quality Management Manual of JBLFMC.
The data-gathering instrument was interpreted by
the use of rubrics. Heidi Goodrich (2008) defines
rubrics as a scoring tool that lists the criteria and
specify the level or extent of performance for several
levels of quality.
To determine the extent of deployment of QSS as
indicated by the compliance of the respondents, the
weighted mean was used, due to the varied number
of respondents.
Analysis of documents gathered from manage-
ment review reflective of internal audit and academ-
ic audit, was used as research method.