19
1 INTRODUCTION
One of the activities specific to offshore operations is
the transfer of personnel between vessels and/or other
offshore structures. Such transfers can include
movements of personnel at crew change and shift
change from vessel to vessel and between vessels,
offshore structures, barges or crew boats
[1,3,6,10,11,26,29]. For such transfer we can use the
personnel transfer carrier, gangways, bridge or
accommodation ladders, including motion-
compensated hydraulic gangways, small boat or
launch, larger crew boat or support vessel, helicopters,
mating ‘surfer’ structures etc. Ladders and personnel
transfer baskets are typically used for vessel-to-vessel
transfers at sea [19,27]. Helicopters are preferred for
platforms and vessels that are harder to access, and
gangways may be better suited for personnel transfers
from shore or other fixed surfaces [1,5,20]. There may
be also some cases where more than one technique is
used; for example, persons transferring by small boat
or crew boat may additionally need to make use of
personnel transfer carriers, ladders or gangways. All of
these methods involve some risk of: drowning, falling
from a height, pinching or crush injuries [8,12,
14,15,17,18,21,23,24,29].
The International Maritime Organization [9]
through the SOLAS Convention [22] and the OCIMF
Guideline [27] recommends the following actions: All
new tankers, irrespective of current intended
trade/operations, should be fitted with equipment that
is certified for the transfer of personnel. Operators of
existing tankers should consider upgrading and
certifying equipment at the next opportunity.
In all cases it is very important to provide guidance
for the offshore shipping industry on the safe transfer
of personnel at sea and eliminate the risk [4,8,11,13,25].
Every maritime employer must mitigate risks that
employees and contract workers face by maintaining
seaworthy vessels, providing appropriate personal
protective gear, and implementing training on job
duties and safety procedures. However, this can get
complicated with maritime personnel transfers. The
An Analysis of the Risks during Personnel Transfer
via Shipboard Crane and Personnel Transfer Basket
(PTB) during Ship to Ship (STS) Operation Offshore
Ł. Lewkowicz
1
& G. Rutkowski
2
1
Master Mariners Association, Gdynia, Poland
2
Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to analyze the risk related to the transfer of personnel via shipboard
crane and Personnel Transfer Basket (PTB) during Ship to Ship (STS) operation offshore. The process of
transferring personnel between two vessels or units offshore can be dangerous and is considered to be a high-risk
operation. It is possible for accidents to occur that can result in serious injury or death. The study contains an
analysis of risk assessment during marine personnel transfer operations from one unit to another, and a
presentation of examples of documentation used in some maritime companies. It is also the answer to the question
of what procedures should be followed to minimize the risk of marine accidents during personnel transfer
offshore via shipboard crane and PTB.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 20
Number 1
March 2026
DOI: 10.12716/1001.20.01.03
20
ship and helicopter or crane are typically owned by
two or more different companies, and the passenger
may be a third-party contractor - all bound by various
reporting procedures and policies. However these
entities must work together to ensure a transfer is
managed safely for everyone involved. The purpose of
this article is to analyze the risk related to the transfer
of personnel via shipboard crane and Personnel
Transfer Basket (PTB) during Ship to Ship (STS)
operation offshore.
The risk presented by personnel transfers at sea is
as old as the maritime industry itself. Embarking and
disembarking can prove as hazardous as (or even more
dangerous than) carrying out one’s duties aboard an
offshore rig, commercial fishing vessel, or other ship.
The risk is present for workers transferred by
helicopter to rigs miles from shore, for those
transferred by smaller boat or even for those who walk
a gangway from a dock to board a smaller vessel.
In PTB personnel have been transferred by crane
between offshore vessels and offshore platforms for
many years and there are well established guidelines
and regulations for this activity, including the
requirement to have cranes certified for personnel
transfer [1,7,13,19,23]. A similar level of guidance and
regulation has not been available for transfers of
personnel between vessels even though incidents have
occurred, especially transfer during Ship-to-Ship (STS)
operation offshore [4,6,14,17,20]. Several options are
available for transferring personnel between vessels.
One option is to transfer personnel using the vessel’s
onboard crane [23, 27]. This article is intended to
evaluate the risks associated with the transfer of
personnel by a vessel’s onboard crane and contains
recommendations on equipment and good operating
practices that will enhance the overall safety of
personnel transfer operations [5,8,11, 13,15,29]. The
use of an onboard crane for the transfer of personnel
has inherent risks [27]. There are many dangers
associated with personnel basket transfers such as:
rough seas, high winds, poorly trained crane operators,
poorly trained seamen, poorly trained signalmen,
supervisors failing to ensure work is done safely,
failure of workers involved in the operation to identify
risks, failure to properly plan the operation and/or
failure to observe safety protocols, regulations.
The article highlights those risks and provides
guidance that should be used in the risk assessment
process to determine the method of transfer [16, 23,27].
Cranes can be used to transfer personnel between two
vessels of similar size, e.g. Ship to Ship (STS) transfers,
but also between vessels of different sizes, e.g. between
a large tanker and a smaller vessel or tugboat. Crane
transfers are typically carried out using a Personnel
Transfer Basket (PTB). The term PTB (see Fig.1) is used
to describe used equipment in which personnel are
transferred. It is recommended that the transfer of
personnel between vessels should be kept to an
absolute minimum but is some cases such STS is
necessary. If a transfer is being considered, the means
of transfer should be evaluated by risk assessment.
Figure 1. From left: X-904 Billy Pugh offshore personnel
transfer basket used in the Brazilian offshore sector, Reflex
Marine transfer pod used in the Gulf of Mexico, and PTB unit
used on the West Coast of Africa offshore Sierra Leaone.
Source: Own researches.
2 METHODOLOGY
All items described in this article are based on the
common requirements covered by the specified oil
field offshore operation manuals (e.g. [1,5,8,15,26]),
installation makers operational manuals [2,4,16,23,29],
ship’s operator manuals [6,7,13,25,27] and the authors
own experience and observation collected offshore
industry since 1997 (e.g. [12,13,19,27]).
3 ANALYSIS OF SELECTED MARITIME
ACCIDENTS RELATED TO THE USE OF PTB
DURING PERSONNEL TRANSFER OPERATION
OFFSHORE
In maritime transport, we have many accidents related
to the use of Personal Transfer Baskets (PTBs) during
personnel transfer operations in the offshore sector
[8,12,21,23,24,29]. These accidents are often due to
incorrect use of equipment, bad weather conditions,
human error, inadequate training of personnel and
inadequate preparation, planning or communication.
For example, according to Blueoceana Company [2]
reports dated February 15, 2025, one worker was fatally
injured and another received serious injuries when a
personnel transfer using a safety cage (PTB) being
hoisted and moved by a ship's crane went bad at the
Panama International Terminal at Rodman Port
(adjacent to the canal's entrance on the Pacific Coast of
Panama). According to a report by the US Bureau of
Safety and Environmental Enforcement [29], there are
a number of incidents involving PTB operation
offshore. There have been incidents in the past where
PTBs have become damaged during transfers, leading
to workers falling into the water [2]. Other accidents
have occurred due to inadequate cargo securing or
improper crane manoeuvring [27]. It is important that
these operations are carried out in accordance with
rigorous safety procedures and that personnel are
properly trained and aware of the risks associated with
the use of PTBs in the offshore sector [20]. One Petro
SPE Project Facilities & Constructions Website [16]
reported, that millions of crew transfers take place each
year, and whether they are by boat or helicopter, this
remains one of the most high-risk activities in offshore
operations. Although the safety of crane transfers
compares favorably with other methods of crew
supply, incidents and associated litigations are not
infrequent.
21
In December 2022 Spotlight [23] reported a
terrifying incident caught on video, where two people
fell overboard during a personnel transfer to the USNS
Comfort off the coast of Haiti. The incident occurred
while a small boat carrying 19 passengers (12 sailors
and 7 civilian personnel) was being lifted by crane up
to the deck of the Navy vessel. The deck of the Comfort
sits about 80 feet (24.4 m) above the water, and as the
boat was about halfway up, it started to turn and then
tipped haphazardly on its side. Standard procedure for
boarding the Comfort, was taking a water taxi and then
a ladder to get on board, but heavy surf led to the
decision to lift a small boat onto the vessel by crane
instead. One can only wonder whether that method
was safe in the first place, why the small boat was not
kept steady during its ascent, whether the crane was
operated appropriately, and whether it would have
been better to wait for calmer waters to complete the
transfer. In another case recorded by Australian
Maritime Safety Authority [1] and Denray Billy Pugh
Agency [4] personnel were transferring to a boat, as the
personnel basket landed on the boat and personnel
began to get off, a wave shifted the boat causing slack
in the rigging, which caused the top section of the
basket strike a contractor.
In January 2018 [15,26], during a swing rope
transfer in the Gulf of Mexico, a contract operator fell
into the water. He was quickly recovered, but he had
already injured his elbow, which needed to undergo
surgery. Lessons learned: Stay vigilant in inspecting for
hazards and keep safety measures for adverse weather
conditions. In another case [10,11,28] when the basket
was lifted off the deck to the supply boat, the crane
block was off center of the basket causing it to swing
and contact the bullwark. One employee fell off the
basket and landed on his back. In another case while
transferring from a platform to a boat via a swing rope,
an employee hit his knee on the top of the stern
bulwarks. A contract operator fell into the water
during swing rope transfer between boat landing deck
and vessel. The injured was diagnosed with abrasions
to the left leg and a strain to his lower back. In another
case while lifting the personnel basket from the deck, it
swung into the side of the boat, and three people got
injured. Similar incidents happened in different parts
of the world in subsequent years. Failed personnel
transfers happen when equipment fails because it is
overloaded, improperly operated, defective, poorly
maintained, or not inspected before use.
In January 2017 [2,4,29], four offshore workers were
being transferred by crane in a Billy Pugh basket from
a vessel to a production facility in the Gulf of Mexico
when the boom began to swing in the wind. The basket
swung uncontrollably and hit the vessel’s railing,
injuring three of the four workers. Upon investigation,
the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement,
tasked with promoting offshore safety, discovered the
crane’s hydraulic swing gear motor had failed. In its
safety bulletin [29], the BSEE narrowed the cause of the
crane’s failure down to improper installation and
inspection of the improperly installed part. Because of
these failures, the crane operator could not control the
boom’s lateral movement.
After reviewing these incidents, the authors tried to
identify common factors between them. These
included, fitness for duty for individuals performing
swing rope transfers; inadequate training and poor
judgement; techniques; and weather factors. In order to
prevent such incidents from happening in the future,
the authors made recommendations which are the
following: Review risk assessment and safety alert with
all personnel who transfer to facilities via swing rope
or personnel baskets. Before personnel transfer, inspect
and test all hardware associated with the operation and
report any deficiencies found. Stress the significance of
patience, weather and sea conditions, and the use of the
‘stop work authority’. Consider developing fitness for
duty requirements for personnel involved in transfers.
4 RISK ASSESSMENT, TOOLBOX TALK, TAKE 5 &
TIME OUT TO STOP THE JOB
Risk Assessment [3,6,8,20,29] is a vital tool to evaluate
the risk in various operations onboard, both routine
and non-routine activities, including human behavior
and other factors related to the personnel. The use of
Risk Assessment also includes ‘Toolbox talk’, ‘Take 5’
and ‘Time out” tools in order to avoid
accidents/incidents. A Risk Assessment shall be
performed in order to define the hazards and to
minimize the risk for incidents/accidents in the various
operations on board, this to include any potential risk
of injury or disease that may arise from the use of
equipment and machinery on board ships or platforms
& installations offshore.
A Risk Assessment shall be carried out prior to any
work [7,13,25] and established operations procedures
e.g. PTB. There may not be a need to carry out a new
Risk Assessment if the established Risk Assessment
[6,7,11,13,25] is relevant for the planned
work/operation/transfer. In this instance, the previous
Risk Assessment should be reviewed/ revised in order:
To ensure that the controls identified are still
relevant.
To ensure that the controls identified are
appropriate to the specific job, location, weather
conditions and personnel involved.
To identify any additional controls where
appropriate.
In case there is any concern about a previous Risk
Assessment or Procedure, a new Risk Assessment
should be performed [20]. Every employees/crew
member should always be concerned about the safety
and take whatever precautions required. Prior to all
activities/operations carried out on our
vessels/offshore unit.
By using the Toolbox Talk at the job site, quickly
discuss before starting a job keeping in mind ‘Safety
First’. Identify the task steps to assess and identify
risks, then identify and implement the required
controls to ensure that all those involved in the task
have a clear understanding of the task. Toolbox Talk
shall always be used if a Risk Assessments is issued for
the upcoming task/operation and any refreshments of
same. Likewise, shall Toolbox Talk be used in
connection with the meeting, on regular basis for
routine tasks on each department onboard.
The following elements should be on the Toolbox
Talk agenda:
The details of the activities involved, for all
participants in the task/operation.
22
The potential hazards identified for each stage of
the task, attention should be given to hazards with
high risk rating.
The control measures in place, or to be put in place,
in order to eliminate the hazards.
Individual actions and responsibilities at various
stages of the task.
Are procedure(s) and checklist(s) for the operation
available and are these used and followed (adhered
to)?
Is all equipment to be used in the ongoing
operation/task checked and ready for use?
Are the required protection and safety equipment
(PPE) available and ready for use?
Have communication equipment been tested and
have lines of command been established?
Figure 2. Risk Assessment General Template. Source: Own
research based on [7,13,25].
Figure 3. Hazards identification & risk assessment
implementation. Source: Own research based on [7,13,25].
Take 5 as a risk assessment tool has five steps:
Step 1. Stop before proceeding. Step 2. Think and ask
questions such as: Have I done this job before? Are
conditions different? What can go wrong? Can I get
hurt doing this job? Step 3. Identify all hazards.
Physically observe the work area. Step 4. Plan and
implement control measures. Get all necessary
tools/equipment, personal protective equipment (PPE)
and assistance if required. Step 5. Proceed with care
when all points have been covered.
Maritime personnel transfers may go wrong for
different reasons. Numerous factors must be
considered when undertaking a single transfer,
including the type of vessel and deck layout, wind
speeds, sea state, temperature, visibility, and vessel
motion. No two transfers are alike, leaving no room for
error. Remember that each of the crewmembers has the
authority and responsibility to stop the job, if he/she
feels that the safety is not sufficient taken care of. It is
essential that all persons involved in an activity are
made fully aware that they have both the authority and
the responsibility to stop the job and call for time-out,
if there is any doubt about the safety of the operation.
If any person concerned about the safety of a
task/operation stops the job, that person’s decision
must be supported, even if it turns out to be based on
wrong reasoning. The officer/person in charge of the
operation/task, shall respond immediately to any
initiative from any participants in the operation/task
when he/she call for a time out. The operation shall not
resume until situation again is normalized. This means
that the risk has been reviewed and is considered at a
level acceptable or normal for the operation and the
control measures have been re-validated. Personnel
transfer operations involve multiple risks across
different transfer methods. Key hazards include:
Crane and Equipment Failures: Poor maintenance
can lead to catastrophic equipment failure.
Mechanical failures on winches, brakes, power loss
etc. can cause drops, impact injuries, or drowning.
Environmental Conditions: Excessive vessel
motion, strong winds, poor visibility, and extreme
temperatures increase the risk of accidents.
Human Errors: Miscommunication, fatigue,
complacency, and inadequate training can result in
loss of control, falls, or equipment failures.
Improper securing of equipment or personnel can
lead to severe injuries or fatalities.
Inadequate Planning: Exceeding equipment
limitations, obstructions in the landing area, and
simultaneous operations increase accident risks.
When injuries occur during personnel basket
transfer, it’s usually as a result of one of the following
causes:
Unsafe conditions at sea: Safety protocols dictate
basket transfer should only occur when seas are
calm enough to do so safely. If the seas are rough,
companies must hold on basket transfers until
conditions are safer.
High winds: If there are high winds blowing, basket
transfer becomes much more complicated and
unsafe. The high winds could cause either the
basket or the crane to move, which throws off the
precision of the transfer and makes it dangerous.
Human error: Crane operators must go through
significant training before they are allowed to take
on basket transfer procedures. If the crane operator
lowers the basket too quickly, moves the basket in
the wrong direction, or makes any other kind of
error during the process, they could easily cause
injury to the workers in the basket.
While external factors such as heavy weather or
rough seas could contribute to the potential danger
associated with a personnel transfer, these risks should
be assessed, and transfers should be delayed until
conditions improve. Maritime personnel transfer
accidents can be prevented by focusing more on:
equipment design and maintenance, deck layout and
recommended transfer procedures, training on
personnel transfers for passengers and operators,
awareness of personnel transfer accidents and
coordination between all companies/entities involved.
Risk can be managed in two ways:
Engineered protection - a modern PTB provides a
secure environment that can protect passengers
from impacts - see Fig.1).
Improved operational control - procedures, pre-lift
planning, communications, and training can all
play a significant role in reducing risk.
All personnel transfers at sea, irrespective of the
method, should be treated as a stand-alone operation
23
and a formal risk assessment should be carried out
beforehand. The risk assessment may be completed
once and included as part of the daily safety briefing or
toolbox talk. However, should conditions change at the
time of the transfer, the impact of these changes should
be considered and appropriate management of change
procedures implemented as necessary. If there are any
concerns regarding the safety of the operation, the
transfer should not take place. Any changes to
equipment or procedures should result in the risk
assessment being reviewed and updated.
If the transfer is not considered to be part of normal
operations, or if specifically required as part of an
operating procedure, then it should be covered by a
valid permit to work (PTW) or crew transfer permit,
and recorded as such. Account should also be taken of
any international or local regulations, codes of safe
working practice, or company or client requirements
governing transfer of personnel at sea.
5 SHIP’S CRANE AND PERSONNEL TRANSFER
BASKETS
Many hose-handling cranes on tankers or cargo cranes
on bulk carriers are not designed for personal transfer
and should not be used unless adapted and certified for
this purpose. OCIMF recommend cranes that are
intended to be used to transfer personnel should meet
the following requirements as a minimum.
Flag State and/or Classification Society
requirements will also need to be followed. Cranes
should be located within the parallel mid-body of the
vessel. Cranes on the stern, such as stores cranes,
should not be used for personnel transfers because of
the risks associated with maneuvering a vessel under
any overhang. The Safe Working Load (SWL) of the
crane should be reduced to 50% of the normal SWL
when transferring personnel. Cranes should be marked
with SWL capacity. The safety factor of the wire should
be at least 10:1. All brakes should be automatically
activated when: controls are in neutral position; the
emergency stop has been activated or there is a power
failure. Brakes should be fitted with a manual override.
Crane hooks should be fitted with a positive locking
(safety) latch. Freefall or non-powered lowering should
not be used when transferring personnel. Safety limit
devices for upper and lower limits of hoisting and
luffing should be fitted and operational. The crane and
all its components should be maintained in accordance
with the vessel’s Safety Management System (SMS)
and manufacturer’s recommendations. The following
additional requirements should be complied with
where possible: Winches should have two independent
braking systems, each capable of holding the rated
SWLs. Cranes designed for the lifting of personnel
should have emergency means for the recovery of the
lifted personnel from any position.
There are several different types of personnel
baskets in use (see Fig. 1) however in practice, the type
of basket used will often depend on regulatory
requirements, the industry sector, the companies
involved and the region. The most popular is Billy
Pugh Basket, which meet all requirements. Billy Pugh
X-904 Offshore Personnel Transfer Device from 4 to 12
persons transfer device is used to quickly and
effectively transport personnel on and off of platforms
and drilling rigs. All X-904’s are made of a sturdy and
very durable aluminum skeleton that encompasses the
rider to protect them from falling objects and any side
impact that may occur. All models are equipped with
quick release safety lanyards to provide safety and give
the rider confidence while in transit. The X-904 is built
above and beyond standard safety rules and
regulations to provide a superior product.
Personnel baskets should be visually checked
before use to ensure all parts are in safe working order.
Formal inspection and replacement of this lifting
equipment should follow local legislation and
company and client requirements. Tag lines should be
used.
A deck landing area should be designated for
personnel baskets, ensuring that it is free from
obstructions (e.g. sounding pipes, vents, tank lids,
pipelines, mooring equipment). The deck itself should
be clean, clearly marked and coated or covered with
anti-slip material. One or more lifebuoys should be
readily available in the vicinity of the crane. It Is
recommended that basket transfers should take place
in daylight in order to minimizes any risk. However, if
it is necessary to conduct a transfer at night, the deck
should be properly illuminated by lighting suitably
positioned so that the crane driver is not dazzled.
Offshore personnel supporting transfer operations
should wear appropriate personal protective
equipment (PPE) in accordance with the requirements
of the ship's SMS. All members of the team should be
competent in transfer by crane operations. On the
active vessel, the transfer by crane team should include
a responsible person, the crane operator, the signaler
and at least two crew members to tend tag lines and
provide assistance. On the passive vessel, the team
should include a responsible person and at least two
crew members to provide assistance. Anyone not
directly involved in the operation should stay well
clear of the area.
The environmental conditions should be assessed
and both vessel Masters and the personnel being
transferred should agree that the current weather
conditions are safe for transfers by crane. The limiting
conditions should be established by the risk
assessments and will depend on the capabilities of the
passive vessel, the size of the vessels, the relative
freeboards, the conditions of load, the limitations of the
crane and the movement and maneuverability of the
vessels. If conditions are unsafe, personnel transfer
operations should be postponed until conditions
improve.
Basket transfer procedures should include
instructions on the limiting weather conditions beyond
which transfers should not take place. The maximum
permitted wind speed and sea/swell height, and the
minimum visibility should be stated. These should not
be contrary to any personnel transfer restrictions
specified by the crane manufacturer or imposed as part
of the crane certification.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Transferring personnel between vessels, offshore
terminals, and installations at sea is often necessary
24
when traditional methods like gangways and boats are
impractical. Personnel baskets provide an alternative
to helicopter landings but come with significant risks.
To minimize injury risks, shipowners and employers
should take essential precautions, including:
Risk assessment: Conducting a thorough evaluation
of vessel conditions, movements, and hazards
before starting the transfer. A safety briefing should
be held with all involved personnel.
Crane inspection: Ensuring the crane is suitable for
personnel transfers and thoroughly checking all
fixtures, fittings, and the hook attachment. The
crane hook should have a pennant to keep it safely
clear of the basket.
Weather considerations: Monitoring wind speed,
wave height, and visibility to ensure conditions are
within the crane manufacturer’s safety limits.
Transfers should be postponed if conditions are
unsafe or expected to deteriorate.
Deck preparation: Keeping the landing area clear of
obstructions, providing anti-slip surfaces, ensuring
flotation devices are available, and conducting
transfers in daylight or under adequate lighting at
night.
Crane operation: Ensuring crane operators are
trained in personnel transfers and are monitored
throughout the process. The operator must control
hook movements to compensate for vessel motion.
Deck personnel safety: Crew members should
position themselves safely to avoid injury from a
swinging basket, and only those actively involved
in the transfer should be near the landing area.
Contingency planning for personnel transfers
(including PTB, accommodation ladders, and pilot
ladders) must be based on a thorough risk assessment.
Risk assessment of personnel transfer at sea by PTB
should include (but not be limited to) the following
issues:
necessity of the transfer and alternatives available;
frequency of transfers and numbers of personnel
involved;
environmental conditions (wind speed and
direction, sea state including swell height and
direction, current or tide speed and direction,
visibility, water temperature, rain, snow, ice and
lightning);
vessel movement (pitch, roll and heave);
action of the water up surging between vessels or
structures in close proximity;
lighting in all areas of the transfer operation;
slip/trip hazards;
station keeping ability of the vessel(s) involved;
seaworthiness of all vessels, crew boats or small
boats employed;
condition of all equipment used in personnel
transfer, including certification where appropriate;
operability and constraints of lifting equipment;
condition and availability of life saving equipment;
communications;
any simultaneous operations (SIMOPS) or other
relevant activities in the area;
training and competence of all personnel involved
in assisting with and making the transfer;
during personnel transfer, the potential for man
overboard is always present. Consideration should
be given to the recovery of personnel (possibly
unconscious or with injuries) from the water;
availability of personnel locator beacons (PLBs) and
tracking systems for man overboard scenarios;
consideration should be given to actions required in
the event of injury to personnel during transfer.
Those involved in any personnel transfer activity
should be briefed with regards to: safety aspects of the
transfer; company or client requirements and
procedures and any regulatory requirements;
communications; potential emergency situations and
operational requirements for the personnel being
transferred. Proper precautions, training, and
equipment inspections are critical to preventing
injuries during personnel basket transfers.
Personnel transfer by basket can be considered as a
safe and acceptable procedure provided that all safety
precautions and best practices are followed. Especially,
the fact that both ships are likely to be relatively rolling,
during a ship-to-ship transfer operation, special care
should be drawn during planning and risk assessment.
Personnel transfer baskets procedures should take
place according to updated OCIMF and STS Plan
guidelines. In case Personnel Transfer takes place
outside the scope of STS, then relevant procedures
should exist at the ISM system of the operator. PTB
should bare a type approval, regularly surveyed and
tested on a record basis. The crane should be equipped
with a special mode for personnel transfer. Range and
operational loads are subject to the service
requirements, mentioned in the specification and
operations manual. Training should be regularly
performed for each specific device. Operators should
have adequate knowledge and experience and records
should be available to provide proof.
In all cases a risk assessment should be performed
and proper planning: Several restrictions and
requirements on board shall apply for the safe
conduction of the operation. Boarding area should be
marked and be of adequate size for boarding, free
hoisting and lowering, providing and functional
boarding. Planning should also predict for non-skid
surface, free of obstacles such as piping, air vents,
bollards etc. The boarding areas should also be wind
and spray sheltered with low noise, free of vibrations
and adequately illuminated. Finally it should be
ensured that both crane operator and banksman have
good visibility of the embarkation disembarkation
area.
Persons involved in basket transfer should be
briefed for safety precautions and emergency actions.
Users of the basket should always wear PPE and
reflective vest and the operation should be attended by
authorized people only. Additionally, the service range
of lifting appliance during operation has to be carefully
considered and ensure that it will not be exceeded at
any circumstances. Furthermore the place should be
manned all the time and in case of emergency, safe
exits for attending personnel is required. The use of
personnel transfer equipment for other duties should
not be allowed.
Essential safety measures include: Ensuring
transferred personnel wear Personal Flotation Devices
(PFDs) and survival suits if required. Providing strobe
lights in low-visibility conditions to aid rescue.
Preparing rescue boats for immediate deployment,
ensuring they are properly manned, maneuverable,
and compliant with regulations. Assigning an
25
emergency response team with trained medical
personnel. Keeping lifebuoys, boat hooks, and heaving
lines readily available. Establishing evacuation plans
for seriously injured personnel.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was funded from the statutory activities of
Gdynia Maritime University, grant number WN/2025/PZ/07.
The Gdynia Maritime University and Polish Master Mariners
Association have been actively involved in research activities
participating in conceptual research and development
studies on market analysis for avoiding and preparing for
possible accidents connected to personnel transfer through
inspections, regular drills, advising of proper approach to
directly involved personnel.
REFERENCES
[1] Australian Maritime Safety Authority, AMSA Website:
[https:// www.amsa.gov.au]. Access date: February-
March 2025.
[2] Blueoceana Company Website:
[https://blueoceana.com]/?p=7258], Access date:
February-March 2025.
[3] Bahamas Maritime Authority Safety Alert 21-01 Pilot-
Transfer-Arrangements:
[https://www.bahamasmaritime.com]. Access date:
January-February 2025.
[4] Denray Billy Pugh Agency Website:
[https://denray.co.nz/billy-pugh-agency]. Access date:
February 2025.
[5] EMSA European Maritime Safety Agency, Annual
Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2024, Web
Page: [http://www.emsa. europa.eu]. Viewed 06.02.2025.
[6] Guidance on the Transfer of Personnel to and from
Offshore Vessels and Structures IMCA SEL 025 Rev. 1,
IMCA M 202 Rev. 1 June 2014;
[https://www.reflexmarine.com].
[7] Havila Shipping ASA Management System Internal
Documents Access by onboard Management Team date:
Feb 2025.
[8] HSE UK Health and Safety Executive Website,
Investigating accidents and incidents. Available from:
[https://www.hse.gov.uk]. Access date: January-February
2025.
[9] IMO, International Maritime Organization Website:
[https://www. imo.org]. Access date: January February
2025.
[10] IMPA, International Maritime Pilots’ Association
Website [https://www.impahq.org/]. Access date:
05.02.2025.
[11] International Chamber of Shipping Pilot Transfer
Arrangements available from: [www.ics-
shipping.org/docs/default-source/resources/safety-
security-and-operations/shipping-industry-guidance-on-
pilot-transfer-arrangements.pdf]. Access date: 05.02.2025.
[12] Jurczyński J, Rutkowski G Analysis of maritime
accidents in the context of demand for MoB MEDS the
Mobile Base of the Marine Emergency Diving Service.
TransNav The International Journal on Marine
Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation,
[https://www. transnav.eu]. ISSN 2083-6473. Journal Vol.
15 No. 1 - March 2021.
[13] Knutsen Group KNOT Management HSE05-01
Approved: Revision 03 / 20.06.2024 Health, Safety &
Environment Protection Manual (HSE)
[14] MGA Mark G. Artall a Professional Law Corporartion:
What to Know About Personnel Basket Accident Cases
[https://markartall.com/about-personnel-basket-
accident-cases/]. Access date: February 2025.
[15] NOAA Incidents News:
[https://incidentnews.noaa.gov/]. Access date: January-
February 2025.
[16] One Petro SPE Project, Facilities & Constructions:
[https://onepetro.org/], Access date: March 2025.
[17] OnlineSTS Ship to Ship Transfer Operation Website:
[www.onlinests.net], Access date: March 2025.
[18] Paris MoU Website: [www.parismou.org], Annual
Reports, Accessed date: January 2025.
[19] Radwański K., Rutkowski G. (2022), An Analysis of the
Risks during Personnel Transfers between Units
Operating on theWater. Journals Water Volume 14, Issue
20, 10.3390/w14203303, Water 2022, 14, 3303.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203303. DOI:
10.3390/w14203303. Special Issue Reliability and Safety in
Ocean and Coastal Engineering), September 2022.
[20] Risks of Marine Transfer of Personnel Offshore by John
Spouge, DNV GL, Philip Strong and Robin Proctor,
Reflex Marine June 2014
[21] Safety4Sea reports: Accident Report from August 7,
2020: Pilot loses life after falling from pilot ladder.
Available from: [https://safety4sea.com]. Access date:
January-February 2025.
[22] SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at
Sea - Consolidated Edition 2024, International Maritime
Organization, Ebook ISBN: 978-92-801-1793-6; DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62454/KH110E; September 2024.
[23] Spotlight on Maritime Personnel Transfer Accidents:
[https://allmarinenews.com], Access date: March 2025.
[24] State Commission on Maritime Accident Investigation,
Results of safety investigations carried out by SMAIC:
[https://pkbwm.gov.pl], Access date: January 2025.
[25] Teekay Shipping Website: [https://www.teekay.com],
Access date: January 2025.
[26] The American Club, n.d. Every Step Matters - Pilot
Boarding Safety. Available from:
[https://www.americanclub.com/files /files/slips_
trips_falls_case_5.pdf]. Viewed: 04.02.2025.
[27] Transfer of Personnel by Crane between Vessels - Oil
Companies International Marine Forum First Edition
2018 OCIMF
[28] UKMPA, The United Kingdom Maritime Pilots’
Association Latest News. Available from:
[https://ukmpa.org/news]. Viewed: 02.02.2025.
[29] US Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
(BSEE) provides recommendations to prevent personnel
transfer accidents: [https://safety4sea.com], Access date:
March 2025.