1409
1 INTRODUCTION
Cargo storage and handling operations have always
generated the risk of fire. The containerization has
increased safety as the goods were separated from each
other with solid walls of the container. However, there
may be dangerous goods inside, some of which could
pose a risk of a fire ignition. There is also a special type
of container that is capable of storing perishable cargo.
This type of refrigerated container is equipped with the
aggregate that maintains a constant, low temperature
inside but generates heat outside of the container.
Taking this into consideration, the risk of fire remains
at non-zero level. The conclusion could be made that it
would be useful to develop a universal, autonomous or
semi-autonomous fire detection or fire prevention
system. This article aims to outline the theoretical
concept of one of them.
The paper is divided into four paragraphs,
excluding introduction and conclusion:
literature review - short description of the papers
and research related to the topic, published in
recent years,
fire prevention policy at container terminals - the
paragraph contains short description of Polish
container terminals, applicable regulations with the
citations of proper documents and the fire
prevention methods maintain in the terminals,
outlining the problem fire incidents in seaports
and container terminals - it contains fire incidents
that occurs in recent years,
fire prevention system - this paragraph presents the
concept of the proposed system, including the
operation algorithm.
This article is an introduction to further research
and development process of creating the system that
fulfills stated requirements.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Articles related to the topic can be divided into three
categories:
use of drones and robots for firefighting and fire
prevention operations;
Drone-based Fire Prevention System on Container
Terminals - A Theoretical Study
P. Wójcik & P. Wierzbicki
Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
ABSTRACT: The article presents the proposition of developing an innovative fire detection system, based on
unmanned aerial vehicles and multiple sensors. The paper contains short review of recent literature related to the
topic, current state of fire prevention policy at the container terminals, scoping on the Polish seaports. To prove
the necessity of the improvement of fire detection methods it has been described the fire incidents from recent
years. The article also outlines the design assumptions of the proposed system as well as the theoretical workflow.
Potential issues, further improvements and prospect have been pointed.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 19
Number 4
December 2025
DOI: 10.12716/1001.19.04.40
1410
risk assessment and safety management at seaports
and terminals;
fire prevention and firefighting systems on vessels.
It is hard to find a study that combines these
categories. Alon, Rabinovich, Fyodorov and Cauchard
in [1] present a user-centered perspective on the
integration of semi-autonomous drones in firefighting.
In [2] Bogue shows details of recently developed
firefighting robots and their applications. Roldán-
Gómez, González-Gironda and Barrientos proposed a
multi-robots firefighting support system based on
drones swarm [9]. In the described system, groups of
drones were used for prevention, surveillance and
extinguishing fire. Apart from the drones the system
also uses the Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented
Reality (AR) interfaces to manage control and provide
quick and convenient information exchange between
mission commander, team leaders and team members
in the field of operation. In [4] - Jin, Kim and Moon
present a development of a firefighting drone capable
of suppressing nascent low-intensity fires.
Ngo Van Nam presents the analysis of fire
prevention operations and systems in Vietnam [8]. His
paper shows statistics of legal actions taken in the last
few years by ports and Vietnam authorities to increase
fire safety. The article also points out some
recommendations and advice for further work on the
described topic. The authors of [7] provide a
comprehensive analysis of the status of the risk
assessment process and its associated methods at Baltic
Sea Region major seaports. Christowa in [3] performs
identification and analysis of threats in Polish seaports.
The authors of the [6] analysed the fire incidents
that occurred on the container ships during the past
decade. They focused on 23 cases and presented a
detailed description of each of them. The paper
includes dates of incidents, locations on the vessels
where each fire broke out, the causes of fires and the
extent of the damage. There is also information about
methods used to extinguish the fire, the number of
victims and whether external help was necessary. In
the conclusions the authors point out the statistics
resulting from their work and propose possible
solutions to the described problem.
3 FIRE PREVENTION POLICY AT CONTAINER
TERMINALS
3.1 Polish container terminals
A container terminal is a complex used for handling
containers - transshipment from various means of
transport in order to continue their journey or storage
in yards. This can take place both between ships and
wheeled vehicles (trucks and trains). In this case we are
talking about a maritime container terminal, which is
usually located close to or even inside larger cities, as
well as being part of a larger port infrastructure.
In Tri-City area we can distinguish two main
container hubs:
Baltic Hub (Container Terminal at the Szczecin
Quay) in Gdańsk [Fig. 1]
GCT (Gdynia Container Terminal) and BCT (Baltic
Container Terminal) in Gdynia [Fig. 2]
Figure 1. Baltic Hub, image source:
https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Ruszyla-rozbudowa-
terminalu-Baltic-Hub-w-Gdansku-warta-ok-2-mld-zl-
8447249.html last accesed 19/03/2025
Figure 2. Baltic Container Terminal, image source: own
collection
3.2 Applicable regulations
The transshipment and transport of goods in
containers cannot take place without the risk of
transporting dangerous goods, which must be
"transported" from one place to another, most often
using sea transport, and therefore stored in port
container terminals. This can lead to dangerous
situations, which port authorities try to prevent as
much as possible. The IMDG Convention
(International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code) - the
International Dangerous Goods Code, i.e. the code for
the safe transport of dangerous goods by sea issued by
the IMO (International Maritime Organization) and
updated every two years. It divides goods into
dangerous classes, regulates and standardizes issues of
packaging, marking of goods during transport, as well
as their placement on ships. Additionally, you can also
find guides there (e.g. first aid in the event of human
1411
exposure to hazardous substances), a list of procedures
in the event of a fire of dangerous substances, as well
as guidelines for the storing of dangerous materials in
containers.
3.3 Fire prevention methods
However, it is also necessary to ensure supervision of
containers located in the storage yard in the container
terminal. In this respect, the "Regulation of the Minister
of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 21
December 2016 on fire protection supervision in Polish
maritime areas and sea ports and harbours" [10] as well
as the "Regulation of the Minister of Foreign Trade and
Maritime Economy of 24 February 1981 on fire
protection in the area of sea ports and harbours" [11]
provide the legal basis.
In Chapter 10 of the Fire Protection Regulation, we
can read paragraphs devoted exclusively to the storage
of containers and methods of preventing spontaneous
combustion of cargo placed in them.
"§ 63.
1. Containers should be stored only on the premises of
container bases or in designated storage yards.
2. Container bases and container storage yards should be
equipped with fire hydrants, fire-fighting equipment and
devices in accordance with applicable standards and with
means of direct communication with the port fire brigade.
§ 64.
1. Container bases and container storage yards should be
divided into quarters. The length of a quarter may not
exceed 100 m, and the width - four times the width of the
containers stored in a given quarter.
2. The permissible stacking of containers may amount to a
maximum of 5 layers, except for containers loaded with
easily flammable materials and refrigerated (air-
conditioned) containers, which may be stacked to a height
of 3 layers.
3. Stacking of containers loaded with class I hazardous
materials and particularly hazardous materials of other
classes is not permitted.
4. Fire routes of at least a width of 6 m, with a hardened
surface.
§ 65.
1. Refrigerated (air-conditioned) containers with internal
combustion engines and containers loaded with dangerous
and explosive materials should be stored in designated
quarters.
2. Refueling in the tanks of refrigerated (air-conditioned)
containers may only be done from a tanker truck.
§ 66.
Container repairs may only be done in places designated for
this purpose.
§ 67.
Container bases and container storage yards should be
equipped with signs in Polish and English prohibiting
smoking and the use of open fire. " [11]
4 OUTLINING THE PROBLEM FIRE INCIDENTS
IN SEAPORTS AND CONTAINER TERMINALS
4.1 The scale of the fire problem in ports around the world
All port logistics centers, not only in Poland, are
exposed to the risk of accidents or fires during their
daily work. Although today early fire warning systems
are working better and better, detecting even the
slightest temperature fluctuations, managers of
container yards must be constantly on their guard.
"The main fire hazard of a port results from the
concentration of national assets of enormous value in a
limited area, which consists of port infrastructure,
materials, cargo, ships, industrial warehouses,
equipment, installations, communication routes, etc. A
similar degree of concentration of so many and so
expensive investments and material goods does not
occur anywhere else in the country, even in the largest
industrial centers." [5]
The best example of an incident in a port was the
recent fire in a hall on the premises of the hazardous
waste incinerator in the Port of Gdańsk the Port
Service complex operating at the Northern Port, built
in 1954. As we can read in an interview with the
spokeswoman for Port Service, Ms. Anna
Lewandowska, the workshop part caught fire, and as a
result no hazardous goods were damaged, however,
the fire brigades sent to extinguish the fire (22 sent,
only 19 came on time) also ensured that there were no
leaks of extinguishing agents into either the water or
the air, which directly reduces the long-term impact of
the fire on both the environment and the operation of
the port.
Figure 3. Smoke over the Northern Port in Gdańsk, image
source: own collection
1412
4.2 Consequences of fires
"Sea ports, as economic facilities located at the interface
between land and sea, are prepared in terms of
technical and organizational aspects to handle foreign
trade, by sea, together with means of sea and land
transport. Therefore, ensuring an acceptable level of
fire safety in ports must include within its scope all
threats related to the characteristics of each of them.
Although certain groups of fire threats are common to
all types of ports, it would be necessary to differentiate
the scale and effects of their impact depending on
whether they concern commercial, passenger or
military ports. Considering civilian ports, it should be
borne in mind that especially those located in the
agglomerations of Gdańsk-Gdynia or Szczecin-
Świnoujście, are key elements for the national economy
of our country. They also have the largest number and
variety of threats. A separate category in terms of fire
threats are fuel ports, such as the Northern Port in
Gdańsk, where, due to the trade exclusively in media
with specific fire characteristics - fire-hazardous
materials, dedicated early detection and mitigation
systems for this type of threat are used. " [5]
In addition to the danger to the port crew, it is also
worth remembering:
economic losses damage or complete destruction
of cargo, downtime in port operations, need to
clarify the situation, control early warning and
prevention systems, additional staff training,
environmental losses potential leaks of hazardous
cargo into the atmosphere, negative impact on the
natural environment as well as on people living in
close proximity to the port (the best example is the
ban on opening windows and leaving the house
during and immediately after the fire extinguishing
operation in the port of Gdańsk)
logistical losses the need to provide access during
fire extinguishing operations, stop work at the
terminal and find another place to store goods for a
specified period of time, conduct an accident
investigation.
There are incidents related to the dangers of storing
cargo in containers all over the world. On August 12,
2015, in the port of Tianjin in North China, explosions
occurred in a storage yard located in Binhai New Area,
as a result of which 173 people died (including 104
firefighters taking part in the firefighting operation)
and many others were injured. The explosions, with a
power of about 800 tons of ammonium nitrate
(equivalent to about 256 tons of dynamite sticks)
occurred within about 30-40 seconds of each other.
Although the cause of the incident was not known at
first, after conducting an appropriate investigation, the
cause of the explosion was found - incorrectly stored
refrigerated container carrying nitrocellulose, as a
result of which it overheated, and caused the harm.
4.3 Difficulties in responding to fires in ports
Despite increasingly modern early warning systems,
incidents at ports involving fires continue to be a major
challenge for container terminals.
Main reasons for the difficulties in responding:
a vast area where containers are located,
stacking of containers,
delayed response of the services.
Due to the above, there is a growing need to find a
modern way to early detect and warn of an
approaching disaster, for example by using unmanned
aerial vehicles drones, equipped with appropriate
devices that help in everyday work on the safety of
container terminals and ensuring continuity of work.
5 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM
Taking into account the previous chapters, it is safe to
point out an argument that it is necessary to develop
new firefighting and fire preventing or detection
systems. The last decade has brought rapid growth in
the fields of automatics, autonomous or semi-
autonomous vehicles, including unmanned aerial
vehicles and Virtual-Reality (VR) or Augmented-
Reality (AG) related technologies. This fact brings the
opportunity to combine these ideas and try to create a
fire prevention system based on them.
5.1 Theoretical outline of the system
Solution proposed in this paper include drones
equipped with both normal and thermal cameras as
well as the sensors to detect smoke, dustiness and fire-
related pollution. To maintain high effectiveness, it is
necessary to use some of the sensors directly in
container stacks. VR could be an optional feature. The
main characteristics of the system should be as follows:
semi-autonomous - it should be possible to fix
regular autonomous patrol path for the drones and
to take manual control over them, when necessary,
constant - the sensors mounted in containers stacks
should maintain constant monitoring of basic
parameters and the unmanned aerial vehicles
should patrol specified area in regular intervals,
three level alarm - entering each level should
depends on the measurements taking by sensors,
weather insensitivity - the system should take
actual weather conditions into consideration when
entering the next alarm level.
Every device should be connected to one server that
performs analysis of the measurements and manages
the states of the system.
As previously stated, the system should include
three levels of actions:
Normal mode - static sensors constantly monitor
each parameter, drones patrol area autonomously
on the fixed routes and taking additional
measurements; the drones should fly in regular
intervals; if every parameter fits in established
requirements the report is generated.
Pre-alarm mode - if one of the sensors detects
abnormal parameters (e.g. temperature of a
container higher than expected) the system should
generate a warning. The nearest drone should be
sent to the area that generates the warning and
switch to manual control. Next, the properly trained
worker should use the drone to check if the
dangerous situation really occurs. Depending on
the outcome the worker should turn off the pre-
alarm mode or switch to alarm mode. In both cases
the system should save logs from the incident and
generate a report.
1413
Alarm mode - if multiple sensors detect abnormal
parameters or one of the measurements indicate
much higher temperature than expected or the
worker starts the alarm mode manually or the
system stays in the pre-alarm mode for too long it
should enter the alarm mode. Nearest drones
should be sent to monitor the situation and collect
additional data. The information about the fire
should be automatically sent to the fire station and
to the terminal and port authorities. The zone
exposed to the fire and the neighboring areas
should be warned and evacuated. The system
should collect all possible data, save logs and
generate detailed report after the end of the alarm.
The general algorithm of the system is show in the
chart below:
Figure 4. The algorithm of the system
5.2 Issues
The previous paragraphs provide a general description
of the proposed system. However, there are some
potential issues that have to be pointed out. In most of
the world there are specified restrictions about
operating a drone. The law in Poland provides
different types of licenses, divided in two categories -
open and special. The specification of the described
system would require the special license. In
consequence, the process of training the worker to
operate a drone would be more difficult and expensive
and obtaining appropriate consents to perform
described actions would be more complicated.
Restrictions directly related to the operation of aerial
vehicle in the port area may also pose a problem.
Another difficult case is to set the optimal places for
sensors to maintain effective measurement of the
scoped parameters. The devices must not influence the
normal workflow on the terminal and simultaneously
they have to collect enough data to provide constant
and proper monitoring of the container stack.
The process of practical development of the
described system should also cover the way of
exchanging and storing the data. There are many ways
to do it and every solution has some advantages and
disadvantages. The optimal method depends on the
device selection, planned budget and the detailed
design assumptions.
The described system will collect a large amount of
data. The information gathered from the sensors won’t
be directly connected to the particular cargo. However,
it could provide many details about the inner working
process at the terminal, the dangerous incidents and
the methods of handling them. Taking into
consideration the geopolitical situation of Poland and
the growing possibility of escalation of the war fought
directly abroad, as well as the fact that our country is
involved in this conflict in the socio-economical way it
is crucial to maintain high standards of cyber security.
Although it is difficult to predict the specific usefulness
of the information gathered by the described system, it
could potentially be utilized in some sort of sabotage
or similar military actions. It is necessary to define
strict terms of gaining access to the data and to ensure
safety.
5.3 Possible improvements and prospects
The system proposed in this article is originally
designed for operation in container terminals,
particularly in Poland. However, if the solution proves
effective it could be implemented on other types of
terminals with minor changes.
The system itself could also be improved by
expanding the patrol paths of the drones and
expanding the devices by mounting additional dust
sensors on them. This solution could be especially
useful in the mass terminals, where it could examine
the level of dustiness at particular distances from the
terminal.
In the future the system could be expanded to
collect and process even more types of data, which
could be useful in statistical analyses, research related
to the environment and planning the seaports areas.
6 CONCLUSION
The main goal of this paper is to propose an innovative
fire prevention system that could be implemented in
the container terminals. The previous paragraphs
contain descriptions of the particular functions of this
system as well as the exemplary algorithm of work.
Both the issues and prospects were mentioned. Further
research is necessary and this paper stands as an
introduction to the practical development of the
system described in the article.
REFERENCES
[1] Alon, O., Rabinovich, S., Fyodorov, C., & Cauchard, J. R.
(2021). Drones in Firefighting: A User-Centered Design
Perspective. In Proceedings of the 23rd International
Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction
(Vol. 24, pp. 111). Association for Computing
Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472030
[2] Bogue, R. (2021). The role of robots in firefighting.
Industrial Robot the International Journal of Robotics
1414
Research and Application, 48(2), 174178.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ir-10-2020-0222
[3] Christowa, C. (2023). Safety Management in Polish
Seaports: Identification and Analysis of Threats.
European Research Studies Journal, XXVI(4), 615631.
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1
17758
[4] Jin, J., Kim, S., & Moon, J. (2024). Development of a
firefighting drone for constructing fire-breaks to suppress
nascent Low-Intensity fires. Applied Sciences, 14(4), 1652.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041652
[5] Kopczewski, M., & Tobolski, M. (2011). Logistyczne
zabezpieczenie działań ratowniczo-gaśniczych podczas
pożarów w portach morskich. Logistyka - Tom Nr 5
(2011) - BazTech - Yadda.
https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.elem
ent.baztech-article-BUS6-0038-0047
[6] Krmek, I., Kos, S., & Brčić, D. (2022). Analytical research
of the container ships cargo area fires in the period from
2010 to 2020. Naše More, 69(1), 62–69.
https://doi.org/10.17818/nm/2022/1.8
[7] Nagi, A., Indorf, M., Singer-Neumann, C., & Ojala, L.
(2019). Current state of risk assessment in Seaports: An
Empirical study. In Springer eBooks (pp. 79101).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25412-4_4
[8] Nam, N. V. (2023). Security of fire prevention and fighting
for seaports in Vietnam meets requirements for
international integrating. European Science Review, 5
6(3), 1320. https://doi.org/10.29013/ESR-23-5.6-13-20
[9] Roldán-Gómez, J. J., González-Gironda, E., & Barrientos,
A. (2021). A survey on Robotic Technologies for forest
Firefighting: Applying drone swarms to improve
firefighters’ efficiency and safety. Applied Sciences, 11(1),
363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010363
[10] Rozporządzenie Ministra Gospodarki Morskiej i Żeglugi
Śródlądowej z dnia 21 grudnia 2016 r. w sprawie nadzoru
przeciwpożarowego w polskich obszarach morskich oraz
morskich portach i przystaniach. (n.d.).
https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WD
U20170000118
[11] Rozporządzenie Ministra Handlu Zagranicznego i
Gospodarki Morskiej z dnia 24 lutego 1981 r. w sprawie
ochrony przeciwpożarowej na obszarze morskich portów
i przystani. (n.d.).
https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WD
U19810050020