812
reached its full capacity in many maritime programs.
Furthermore, while industry collaboration is a key
strength, the study highlights the need for more
structured and formalized partnerships to ensure the
curricula remain relevant and aligned with the
practical demands of the maritime sector.
One of the key implications of this research is the
need for educational institutions to prioritize the
development of comprehensive, interdisciplinary
curricula that integrate sustainability and green
technologies. This includes enhancing training in
emerging areas such as alternative fuels, energy-
efficient maritime technologies, and environmental
management. Additionally, maritime educators must
be supported with continuous professional
development to stay updated on the latest
technological advancements and sustainability
practices. Another important implication is the need to
formalize industry-academia collaborations. While
existing partnerships are valuable, there is a need for
more strategic and structured alliances between
maritime institutions and industry stakeholders. Such
partnerships can help ensure that the education
provided is closely aligned with industry needs,
providing students with more relevant and hands-on
learning experiences.
Finally, this research underscores the importance of
enhancing regulatory knowledge within maritime
education, particularly in the context of sustainability.
Future research should explore further how maritime
education can better prepare students to understand
and navigate the complexities of international
regulations, environmental standards, and
sustainability requirements. This research highlights
the critical role of integrating sustainability,
interdisciplinary learning, and industry collaboration
into maritime education to ensure that future seafarers
are equipped to meet the challenges of a rapidly
evolving maritime industry. By addressing the gaps
identified in this study, educational institutions can
better prepare their graduates for successful careers in
a sustainable and technologically advanced maritime
sector.
7 RESEARCH LIMITATION AND FUTURE
RESEARCH AGENDA
While this research provides valuable insights into the
enhancement of maritime education for future
seafarers, it is not without limitations. One key
limitation is the relatively small sample size, consisting
of only 10 participants from specific fields within the
maritime industry. Although the diversity in expertise
provided rich qualitative data, a larger and more
varied sample would offer a broader understanding of
the perspectives on maritime education. Furthermore,
the research focused primarily on the viewpoints of
industry professionals, lecturers, and graduates from a
limited geographical scope, which may limit the
generalizability of the findings to global contexts.
Additionally, the study primarily relied on
qualitative interviews, which, while rich in detail, may
be influenced by subjective interpretations and biases.
Future research could benefit from a mixed-methods
approach, combining qualitative interviews with
quantitative surveys to provide a more comprehensive
analysis of maritime education's effectiveness.
Future research could explore the impact of specific
green technologies and sustainability practices on the
maritime curriculum. Investigating the effectiveness of
current industry-academia partnerships and their
direct impact on curriculum development and
students’ career readiness would also be valuable.
Moreover, research into the development of
competency-based frameworks for maritime
education, incorporating the latest regulatory and
sustainability standards, would contribute
significantly to preparing future seafarers for the
evolving maritime industry. Finally, cross-cultural
studies that examine maritime education in different
regions could provide insights into global best
practices.
REFERENCES
[1] D. Gavalas, T. Syriopoulos, and E. Roumpis, “Digital
adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry,” J.
Shipp. Trade, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 11, 2022.
[2] R. Agrifoglio, C. Cannavale, E. Laurenza, and C. Metallo,
“How emerging digital technologies affect operations
management through co-creation. Empirical evidence
from the maritime industry,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 28,
no. 16, pp. 1298–1306, 2017.
[3] H. P. Berg, “Human factors and safety culture in maritime
safety,” Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. STCW, Marit. Educ.
Train. (MET), Hum. Resour. Crew Manning, Marit.
Policy, Logist. Econ. Matters, vol. 107, pp. 107–115, 2013.
[4] C. Young, “Comprehensive Revision of the STCW
convention: an overview,” J. Mar. L. Com., vol. 26, p. 1,
1995.
[5] S. Ghosh, M. Bowles, D. Ranmuthugala, and B. Brooks,
“On a lookout beyond STCW: Seeking standards and
context for the authentic assessment of seafarers,” in 15th
Annual General Assembly of the International
Association of Maritime Universities, IAMU AGA 2014-
Looking Ahead: Innovation in Maritime Education,
Training and Research, 2014, pp. 77–86.
[6] S. Fang, Y. Wang, B. Gou, and Y. Xu, “Toward future
green maritime transportation: An overview of seaport
microgrids and all-electric ships,” IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 207–219, 2019.
[7] V. Lo Iacono, P. Symonds, and D. H. K. Brown, “Skype as
a tool for qualitative research interviews,” Sociol. Res.
online, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 103–117, 2016.
[8] F. Ferri, P. Grifoni, and T. Guzzo, “Online learning and
emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and
challenges in emergency situations,” Societies, vol. 10, no.
4, p. 86, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/soc10040086.
[9] E. Demirel, “Maritime education and training in the
digital era,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., 2020.
[10] P. M. G. B. de Água, A. D. da Silva Frias, M. de J.
Carrasqueira, and J. M. M. Daniel, “Future of maritime
education and training: blending hard and soft skills,”
Pomorstvo, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 345–353, 2020.
[11] M. Oldenburg, X. Baur, and C. Schlaich, “Occupational
Risks and Challenges of Seafaring,” J. Occup. Health, vol.
52, no. 5, pp. 249–256, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1539/joh.K10004.
[12] G. Xiao, Y. Wang, R. Wu, J. Li, and Z. Cai, “Sustainable
maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping
technology and green port construction applications,” J.
Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1728, 2024.
[13] M. Brenker, S. Möckel, M. Küper, S. Schmid, M. Spann,
and S. Strohschneider, “Challenges of multinational
crewing: a qualitative study with cadets,” WMU J. Marit.
Aff., vol. 16, pp. 365–384, 2017.