693
6 MEASURES TO IMPROVE SEAFARERS SUPPLY
6.1 The factors of influence
The factors that influence the availability of seafarers
are numerous and it is difficult to generally single out
some, especially as they influence changes over time.
In any case, it is worth highlighting the factors that
somehow stand out in most of the previous analyses.
A 2012 study of 40,000 seafarers found that the most
important factor for staying at sea for 76% of all
respondents was salary [27]. Furthermore, another
study carried out by Mitroussi, K. and Chang, C.J.
emphasizes six motivational factors: the salary,
opportunity to learn novel skills, personal
development and improvement, the possibility of
promotion and friendly working environment [28]. In
paper Thomas et al, which analyze the impact of
seafarers work on family life, pointing out efforts that
should be made to make life of seafarers to be more
bearable, considering life separated from family [29]:
− shorter trips (if possible up to four months),
− paid leave of appropriate duration,
− employment based on a permanent contract,
− training time outside of leave,
− possibility of boarding a family,
− availability of cheap communications,
− better contact between seafarers' families and
seafarers' employers.
The traditional great maritime nations no longer
exist, at least not in the sense that the fleet is
consolidated at national level, its management as well
as the national crews. Shipping has long since become
global, so widely dispersed that at first glance it is
impossible to link a ship to its actual owners or
managers. Seafarers are also recruited worldwide,
mostly through intermediaries at the mercy of the
global labour market, where the search for cheap
labour is a priority. Under these circumstances, it
becomes extremely difficult to find and retain good
crews. Generally speaking, in order to improve the
lives of seafarers on board or increase the attractiveness
of the profession, the influence of the countries from
which the seafarers come and the companies that
employ them is crucial. Countries that do not have
their own fleet are in a more difficult position,
especially if the standard of living and quality of life
are above average. Their efforts to promote
employment in the maritime sector are limited. Also
we should bear in mind that the interests of companies
and the pursuit of profit do not go hand in hand with
the welfare of seafarers. According to Wang and Yeo
(2016), the recruitment of seafarers for shipping
companies depends mainly on the cost of crewing, as
this cost is one of the highest of all fixed costs. The same
authors also provide a list of factors that influence the
decision-making process for seafarers employment,
and first on the list is the overall coast of the crew,
followed by the quality of seafarers' education and
training, cross-cultural management skills, the ability
to procure well-trained seafarers and loyalty to
shipping companies [30].
Shipowners today favour the two types of indirect
recruitment methods, using crewing companies or
third-party ship management companies, although
they are aware that this practise leads to quality and
performance problems and can lead to undue
exploitation of seafarers. This is very common in
countries such as the Philippines [31]. The same
authors [31] emphasise that the abandonment of the
seafaring profession is due to lack of promotion
opportunities, increasing demand for well-paid shore-
based jobs, poor working conditions on board,
increased workload, stress, loneliness, isolation,
cultural diversity, generational issues, poor human
resource practices, unfair contracts, etc. In view of all
this, seafarers from East and Southeast Asian countries
are the first choice, especially from the Philippines,
China and Indonesia, followed by Vietnam and
Myanmar. In addition to the low labour costs, maritime
tradition and large population, seafarers from these
countries are highly disciplined, dedicated and loyal
[22]. As mentioned earlier, the Philippines is now the
main supplier of seafarers in the world, and has been
for many years. The Philippines is a traditional
seafaring country, but what additionally characterises
Filipino seafarers are: good command of English,
quality education and training, cultural proclivity
(orientation towards hard work, discipline, strong
family ties, adaptability, motivation, etc.), cost
competitiveness. Possible disadvantages include
cultural differences and language barriers compared to
crews from other nations, as well as the need for
constant development to remain competitive. [32]
In their analysis of Korean-flagged ships, Wang and
Yeo conclude that Filipinos are the best foreign
seafarers, although they are more expensive compared
to other countries such as Myanmar, Vietnam and
Indonesia. The authors emphasise that Filipinos are
well educated and trained, have above average
communication skills and English language
proficiency, and as a nation generally provide a reliable
and adaptable market for crew members. As for the
other nations, while Myanmar is cheaper and has
exceptional loyalty, it cannot provide sufficient and
stable numbers of seafarers, especially officers, as a
supply country. Indonesia has a shortage of ship
officers and seafarers from this country are prone to
cultural and religious conflicts with other nations.
China has the potential to become the largest supplier
of seafarers, but seafarers still have problems with the
English language and labour costs are also rising. [30]
An analysis of the supply and demand for seafarers
in recent decades shows that, in the context of the
factors influencing supply and demand, the market for
masters and officers should be separated from that of
ratings. We can safely say that the ratings market is
simpler to analyse and generally corresponds to what
has already been said about the overall seafarer
market. This is because the traditional maritime
countries can no longer compete with countries such as
the Philippines, China, Indonesia and India in terms of
labour costs, number of seafarers, long-term supply
and other segments. As far as the officers market is
concerned, the situation is different. A significant
percentage still consists of seafarers from traditional
maritime countries, i.e. countries with a higher GDP.
Russia and Ukraine certainly stand out as countries
with a significant share of the seafarers, but their large
share is due to the political situation and current
relations in the region, as well as the question of how
long they can be counted on in the long term. Due to
the ongoing war, the numbers of new seafarers from
Russia and Ukraine is likely to be limited for some