(6)
where:
− pi - probability of the i-th grayscale level.
− L - total number of intensity levels.
Figures from 5 to 12 show that it is the green light
that consistently produced images with higher contrast
and lower noise levels. Green lighting outperformed
red and white in all three metrics, indicating better
contrast, structural detail, and texture preservation.
Red lighting, while reducing glare, low in entropy and
variance due to loss of detail. White lighting offered
balanced performance but introduced substantial
backscatter, diminishing edge clarity. Red lighting,
while effective at minimizing glare, was found
insufficient for identifying fine surface features beyond
1 meter of standoff. This is attributed to high
absorption of red wavelengths in water. Conversely,
white light produced adequate results at close range
but was impaired by multi-directional scattering
artifacts.
The use of modulated lighting markedly improved
the ability to discern surface textures, cracks, and
biofouling on the quay wall. These study's findings
align with established principles of underwater optics,
where water's absorption and scattering characteristics
vary across different wavelengths. Green light's
optimal balance between absorption and scattering
makes it particularly effective for underwater imaging
in turbid conditions. The rapid absorption of red light
and the high scattering associated with white light
limit their utility in such environments.
The integration of modulated lighting systems,
particularly those utilizing green LEDs, can
significantly enhance the capabilities of ROVs in
conducting underwater inspections. By improving
visibility and image clarity, these systems enable more
accurate assessments of structural conditions,
facilitating timely maintenance and repair
interventions. The findings underscore the importance
of tailoring ROV lighting configurations to the specific
optical properties of the inspection environment (local
approach).
Advancements in adaptive lighting technologies
and real-time image processing algorithms hold
promise for further enhancing ROV-based inspections.
The development of systems capable of dynamically
adjusting lighting parameters in response to
environmental conditions could optimize image
quality across a range of turbidity levels. Additionally,
integrating machine learning techniques for automated
defect detection could streamline the inspection
process and reduce reliance on manual analysis.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The results presented in this work may be used in the
future to provide a quantitative foundation for
selecting the optimal lighting spectrum for underwater
ROV inspections. It has been shown that modulated
lighting, particularly green light at approximately
550 nm, significantly improves image clarity and
defect detection during ROV-based underwater
inspections in turbid water conditions. Moreover red
light's rapid absorption and white light's high
scattering limit their effectiveness in enhancing
visibility in such environments. Therefore, tailoring
ROV lighting configurations to the specific optical
properties of the inspection environment is crucial for
optimizing image quality and inspection accuracy.
Future research should focus on the development of
dynamic lighting control systems and the
incorporation of automated image analysis tools to
streamline the inspection process and improve the
reliability of defect detection. The integration of
advanced lighting systems and adaptive technologies
can further enhance the capabilities of ROVs, enabling
more efficient and effective underwater inspections.
Moreover, without real-time knowledge of Rrs and
turbidity, visual navigation and inspection become
compromised, leading to false negatives in defect
detection or navigation errors. Therefore, deploying in
situ sensors capable of measuring Rrs and turbidity
profiles at multiple depths can inform lighting
configuration (e.g., selecting appropriate LED spectra)
and camera exposure settings.
REFERENCES
[1] Jason D. Bakos, Chapter 4 - Memory optimization and
video processing, Editor(s): Jason D. Bakos, Embedded
Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, 2016, Pages 147-185, ISBN
9780128003428, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800342-8.00004-3
[2] https://www.chasing.com/en/chasing-m2.html
[3] Freda W. Comparison of the spectral-angular properties
of light scattered in the Baltic Sea and oil emulsions. J
Europ Opt Soc Rap Public. 2014;9:14017. doi:
10.2971/jeos.2014.14017
[4] Freda W, Piskozub J. Revisiting the role of oceanic phase
function in remote sensing reflectance. Oceanologia.
2012;54:29–38. doi: 10.5697/oc.54-1.029
[5] Haule K, Kubacka M, Toczek H, Pranszke B, Freda W.
Correlation between Turbidity and Inherent Optical
Properties as an Initial Recognition for Backscattering
Coefficient Estimation. Water (Switzerland).
2024;16(4):594.
[6] Kowalczuk P, Olszewski J, Darecki M, Kaczmarek S.
Empirical relationships between coloured dissolved
organic matter (CDOM) absorption and apparent optical
properties in Baltic Sea waters. Int J Remote Sens.
2005;26(2):345–370. doi: 10.1080/01431160410001720270
[7] Kosiek J, Kaizer A, Salomon A, Sacharko A. Analysis of
Modern Port Technologies Based on Literature Review.
TransNav, the International Journal on Marine
Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation.
2021;15(3):667–674. doi: 10.12716/1001.15.03.22