477
1 INTRODUCTION
Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) are tethered to
and controlled from surface vessels, enabling the
exploration and monitoring of underwater
environments without the physical presence of human
operators within the vehicle [13]. The application of
ROVs in the technical inspection of submerged
components of marine and coastal infrastructure is of
significant importance. By means of video recording,
digital imaging, technical data acquisition, and seabed
topographic surveys, ROVs facilitate the collection of
critical information necessary for the design,
construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation of these
structures. Routine inspections are essential to
ensuring the operational integrity and longevity of any
underwater infrastructure [12]. In particular, the
inspection of port infrastructure plays a pivotal role in
maintaining safe, efficient, and sustainable port
operations.
In the context of Polish seaports, the frequency and
scope of quay inspections are governed by port
regulations established by the directors of maritime
offices with jurisdiction over specific coastal areas.
These regulations stipulate the obligations of quay
operators regarding the upkeep and monitoring of port
infrastructure. Specifically, operators are required to
conduct periodic hydrographic soundings and seabed
cleanliness assessments in the zones adjacent to quays
and port basins.
The utilization of ROVs in underwater surveying
and inspection is a relatively recent advancement,
which contributes to the limited volume of academic
and technical literature addressing this methodology
[18]. The most pertinent publication in this domain is
[19], originating from Lithuania, which details the
deployment of a domestically developed ROV
comparable to the one employed in the present study.
However, the Lithuanian research primarily focused
Use of an ROV with Modulated Lighting for Diagnosing
the Technical Condition of Submerged Port Wharf
Structures
A. Kaizer, B. Lednicka, A. Tessmer, W. Freda, J. Soszyńska- Budny & E. Ziajka
Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
ABSTRACT: The technical condition of underwater port structures is critical to the safety and longevity of
maritime infrastructure. Traditional inspection techniques, such as diver-assisted surveys, are constrained by
safety risks, limited duration, and reduced efficiency in turbid waters. This study explores the application of a
remotely operated vehicle (ROV) equipped with modulated lighting systems to enhance visibility and facilitate
high-resolution imaging in optically complex underwater environments. The experiment employed a CHASING
M2 ROV, modified with red, green, and white lighting configurations, to inspect the quay wall of a port. The
impact of lighting color on image quality was evaluated. Results indicate that modulated lighting tailored to the
optical properties of turbid coastal waters can improve image contrast and facilitate defect detection. The findings
highlight the potential for advanced ROV systems to augment underwater inspection protocols in challenging
optical environments.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 19
Number 2
June 2025
DOI: 10.12716/1001.19.02.17
478
on the inspection of a vessel’s submerged hull and the
development of a related database. A comprehensive
review of existing literature indicates that future port
infrastructures are expected to integrate advanced
automation technologies, electrification, and intelligent
energy management systems [7].
The deployment of Remotely Operated Vehicles
(ROVs) for the technical inspection of underwater port
infrastructure represents a promising and increasingly
viable alternative to traditional diver-based methods.
This approach offers the potential to substantially
reduce operational costs, inspection timeframes, and
risks to human safety. As diagnostic platforms, ROVs
can be outfitted with a range of sensor systems and
imaging technologies, facilitating the collection of
high-resolution visual data and comprehensive
technical information.
The objective of the present study is to assess the
feasibility of utilizing ROVs equipped with modulated
lighting systems for the visualization and diagnostics
of the technical condition of submerged components of
port wharfs. The goal is to determine whether this
approach can serve as a cost-effective yet equally
reliable alternative to conventional underwater
inspection techniques.
The successful planning and execution of
underwater engineering, inspection, and maintenance
activities depend critically on the optical characteristics
of the aquatic environment. In particular, two key
parametersremote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and
turbidityare instrumental in characterizing water
clarity, light propagation conditions, and the overall
suitability of a given water body for vision-based
operations. These parameters are especially pertinent
in port environments, where the presence of
suspended particulate matter (SPM), dissolved organic
and inorganic substances, and hydrocarbon-based
pollutants such as oil significantly affects underwater
visibility and image quality [9].
Among these factors, high turbidity constitutes the
most prominent challenge to effective underwater
imaging. Turbidity results primarily from elevated
concentrations of suspended particulate matter, which
scatter incident light and thereby impair visibility and
reduce the quality of acquired imagery. This scattering
is quantitatively described by the Volume Scattering
Function (VSF) (Formula 1), which represents the
angular distribution of scattered light intensity dI per
unit incident irradiance E in a given volume dV.
( )
( )
( )
11
,
,
dI
VSF m sr
E dV


−−

=

(1)
This formulation accurately characterizes the
phenomenon of single scattering. In marine
environments, the Volume Scattering Function (VSF) is
known to exhibit significant asymmetry. Specifically,
forward scattering may exceed backscattering by up to
six orders of magnitude [15], a disparity that
substantially degrades the clarity of images acquired in
turbid waters. This pronounced anisotropy in
scattering behavior has been confirmed by the
pioneering measurements conducted by Petzold [14],
as well as by subsequent studies carried out in the
Baltic Sea [3, 4].
The integral of the VSF over the full solid angle
domain yields the scattering coefficient b(λ), which
quantifies the total amount of light scattered per unit
length and is expressed in units of m
-1
:
(2)
In axially symmetric systems, where particle
orientation is random, the scattering phase function
defined as the Volume Scattering Function (VSF)
normalized by the scattering coefficient b(λ)
describes the angular probability distribution of
scattered light. In highly turbid waters, where the
mean free path of photons is reduced to the order of
centimeters, multiple scattering effects become
predominant. Under such conditions, the single-
scattering approximation is no longer valid, resulting
in glare and diminished image contrast, particularly
when conventional, non-collimated lighting is
employed.
Turbidity represents a direct measure of water
clarity, quantifying the cloudiness or haziness caused
by the presence of numerous light-scattering and light-
absorbing particles. It is typically expressed in
Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) and shows a
strong positive correlation with the scattering
coefficient b(λ), while correlating inversely with
underwater visibility [5]. Beyond its influence on light
propagation, turbidity imposes a fundamental limit on
the effective imaging range of optical sensors.
Turbidity levels are typically elevated in coastal and
port environments due to anthropogenic activities
such as dredging, vessel movement, and industrial
discharges.
In oligotrophic oceanic waters, turbidity is minimal,
allowing light penetration depths to exceed 30 meters.
Conversely, in turbid port environments, visibility
may be restricted to less than 1 meter due to high
concentrations of suspended particulate matter (SPM).
The particle size distribution (PSD), refractive index,
and angular scattering properties of the water are
strongly influenced by the composition and origin of
the particulates, all of which modulate lightmatter
interactions within the medium.
SPM in port waters is predominantly generated by
sediment resuspension processes and typically consists
of silts, clays, and other mineral particles. These
particulates are highly efficient at scattering light,
particularly in the forward direction. In port areas,
sediment resuspension is frequently induced by vessel
propeller wash, cargo handling operations, and
construction-related activities. The backscattering
coefficient bb(λ) increases proportionally with mineral
content, contributing to elevated remote sensing
reflectance (Rrs) values, especially within the green and
red spectral bands.
Absorption is another critical factor affecting
underwater visibility. In clear, oligotrophic waters,
blue light exhibits the greatest penetration depth,
owing to minimal absorption by both water molecules
and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). In
contrast, turbid coastal waterscharacterized by
elevated concentrations of CDOM and SPMexhibit
absorption minima in the mid-visible range (500600
479
nm), resulting in the characteristic green coloration of
such waters [6; 8; 17].
Remote Sensing Reflectance (Rrs) (Formula 3)
describes the spectral ratio of water-leaving radiance
(Lw) to downwelling irradiance (Ed).
( )
( )
w
rs
d
L
R
E
=
(3)
Remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) is significantly
influenced by both the absorption and backscattering
coefficients, which are themselves governed by the
concentration, size distribution, and composition of
suspended particulate matter. In underwater
environments where visual tasks such as crack
detection, biofouling assessment, and infrastructure
mapping are of critical importance, Rrs functions as a
real-time, non-invasive indicator of water clarity. As
such, it can inform both lighting modulation strategies
and image post-processing techniques employed by
Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs). Rrs typically
exhibits peak values at wavelengths where absorption
is minimal and backscattering is relatively high. This
spectral behavior has direct implications for the design
of ROV lighting systems: rather than relying on
broadband white light, the use of spectrally optimized
light sourcesparticularly within the green region
(500600 nm)can enhance image contrast and depth
perception under turbid conditions.
In addition to particulate-induced turbidity, the
presence of oil and hydrocarbon derivatives introduces
further complexity to underwater optical assessments.
This is particularly relevant in port and harbor
environments, especially those in proximity to
petrochemical terminals, where surface oil films,
dispersed oil droplets, and emulsified hydrocarbons
are frequently observed. These substances induce
nonlinear optical effects due to their complex refractive
indices and strong wavelength-dependent absorption
and reflection properties [9; 11].
Oil contamination in water typically leads to
increased absorption at shorter wavelengths (blue
violet) and generates specular reflections at airoil
water interfaces. Furthermore, emulsified oil droplets
can modify the scattering phase function by enhancing
mid-angle and backscattering components. This optical
alteration results in elevated Rrs values in the red and
near-infrared spectral regions, while simultaneously
diminishing spectral contrast. The resulting flattening
of the reflectance spectrum reduces the effectiveness of
color-based segmentation and object detection
algorithms commonly used in underwater computer
vision systems.
Consequently, ROVs operating in port
environments must be capable of adapting to
dynamically variable optical conditions, which may
arise from fluctuating concentrations of suspended
particles, oil contamination, and inputs from urban
runoff.
2 METHODOLOGY
The ROV used in this experiment is CHASING M2
(figure 1), which is a compact-sized, professional
underwater ROV designed for professional users and
industrial applications. Its compact aluminium alloy
body allows for single-person operation and quick
deployment. The M2 features omni-movement in all
directions, and thanks to its depth-lock function, it can
hover precisely in any position. This enables
underwater photography, observation, and
manipulation at any angle. The ROV is compatible
with various attachments such as a Robot Claw, GoPro
camera, external LED lights, and a laser scaler, with a
maximum mounting payload of 1.5 kg. The default
battery provides up to 4 hours of continuous operation.
CHASING M2 is capable of recording underwater
temperature and depth, providing professional
underwater data support. Its maximum working depth
is 100 meters, and the operating temperature ranges
from -10 to 45 . The device achieves a maximum
speed of 1.5 m/s (3 knots). Additionally, the M2 is
equipped with two LED lights with a total brightness
of 4000 lumens (three gears), which compensate for the
darkness of deep water.
They improve underwater distance and visibility
clarity, significantly restoring natural underwater
colors. It is also equipped with a 4K video resolution
camera and the ability to observe during investigation
by connecting a phone to the remote controller [2]. A
GoPro camera was used, which was mounted on the
vehicle.
Figure 1. Chasing M2 - ROV with GoPro camera used in
experiment
In the conducted experiment, white, red, and green
light were used to investigate how the colour of light
affects the image observed beneath the water's surface
(figure 2,3,4).
Figure 2. White light
480
Figure 3. Red light
Figure 4. Green light
3 RESULTS
The technical condition survey of the port's quay wall
was conducted using an ROV. The inspection work
commenced with scanning the vertical face of the quay
wall along the entire length of the examined section
(figure 5,6).
Figure 5,6. Visibility of quay wall with daylight
The ROV, equipped with a high-resolution video
camera and LED lighting, moved along the structure,
recording real-time imagery. The first series of
observations was conducted using standard white
light (figure 7,8), which served as a baseline for
assessing overall visibility and the characteristics of the
underwater image. Subsequently, red (figure 9,10) and
green (figure 11,12)light were used.
Figure 7,8. Visibility near the quay wall with white light
Figure 9,10. Visibility near the quay wall with red light
Figure 11,12. Visibility near the quay wall with green light
Under daylight conditions, visibility was low due to
ambient light scattering and absorption (Figures 5, 6).
Switching to ROV-mounted illumination improved
image acquisition. For white light (Figures 7 and 8) it
provided balanced spectral coverage, but succumbed
from glare and low contrast in turbid water due to
multi-wavelength backscatter.
In case of red light (Figures 9 and 10) scattering was
minimized but was rapidly absorbed, limiting
visibility to a short range. Figures 11 and 12 show that
for green light optimal visibility has been delivered.
The wavelength (~550 nm) aligns with the absorption
minimum in CDOM-rich waters, improving depth
penetration and structural detail clarity.
4 DISCUSSION
Quantitative image analysis revealed that green light
increased the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of structural
features by approximately 25% compared to white
light and 40% compared to red light. Metrics such as
edge contrast (Ce), grayscale variance (σ2), and
histogram entropy (H) were computed to evaluate
image quality under each spectral condition (Table 1).
Edge detection was first performed using a Sobel filter
[1], and then average contrast was computed across a
representative sample of edge segments. Moreover
grayscale variance was calculated for each image after
converting to grayscale. Histogram entropy H was
calculated using the Shannon entropy formula [16]. In
table 1 summarizes the results of image quality
assessment for three spectral lighting conditions
(white, red, and green) used during ROV inspections.
Table 1. The quantitative evaluation of image quality under
different lighting conditions
light
Ce (mean)
σ
2
H
white
0.42
1056
6.72
red
0.31
678
5.88
green
0.54
1420
7.12
where edge contrast was calculated using the
difference in pixel intensity across detected edges:
max min
e
max min
II
C
II
=
+
(4)
where:
481
Imax - maximum pixel intensity on one side of an
edge.
Imin - minimum pixel intensity on the other side.
Whereas grayscale variance was computed using:
( )
2
2
1
1
N
i
i
II
N
=
=−
(5)
where:
Ii - intensity of the i-th pixel,
I
- intensity of the image,
N - number of pixels.
The histogram entropy H was calculated using
formula:
2
1
L
ii
i
H p log p
=
=−
(6)
where:
pi - probability of the i-th grayscale level.
L - total number of intensity levels.
Figures from 5 to 12 show that it is the green light
that consistently produced images with higher contrast
and lower noise levels. Green lighting outperformed
red and white in all three metrics, indicating better
contrast, structural detail, and texture preservation.
Red lighting, while reducing glare, low in entropy and
variance due to loss of detail. White lighting offered
balanced performance but introduced substantial
backscatter, diminishing edge clarity. Red lighting,
while effective at minimizing glare, was found
insufficient for identifying fine surface features beyond
1 meter of standoff. This is attributed to high
absorption of red wavelengths in water. Conversely,
white light produced adequate results at close range
but was impaired by multi-directional scattering
artifacts.
The use of modulated lighting markedly improved
the ability to discern surface textures, cracks, and
biofouling on the quay wall. These study's findings
align with established principles of underwater optics,
where water's absorption and scattering characteristics
vary across different wavelengths. Green light's
optimal balance between absorption and scattering
makes it particularly effective for underwater imaging
in turbid conditions. The rapid absorption of red light
and the high scattering associated with white light
limit their utility in such environments.
The integration of modulated lighting systems,
particularly those utilizing green LEDs, can
significantly enhance the capabilities of ROVs in
conducting underwater inspections. By improving
visibility and image clarity, these systems enable more
accurate assessments of structural conditions,
facilitating timely maintenance and repair
interventions. The findings underscore the importance
of tailoring ROV lighting configurations to the specific
optical properties of the inspection environment (local
approach).
Advancements in adaptive lighting technologies
and real-time image processing algorithms hold
promise for further enhancing ROV-based inspections.
The development of systems capable of dynamically
adjusting lighting parameters in response to
environmental conditions could optimize image
quality across a range of turbidity levels. Additionally,
integrating machine learning techniques for automated
defect detection could streamline the inspection
process and reduce reliance on manual analysis.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The results presented in this work may be used in the
future to provide a quantitative foundation for
selecting the optimal lighting spectrum for underwater
ROV inspections. It has been shown that modulated
lighting, particularly green light at approximately
550 nm, significantly improves image clarity and
defect detection during ROV-based underwater
inspections in turbid water conditions. Moreover red
light's rapid absorption and white light's high
scattering limit their effectiveness in enhancing
visibility in such environments. Therefore, tailoring
ROV lighting configurations to the specific optical
properties of the inspection environment is crucial for
optimizing image quality and inspection accuracy.
Future research should focus on the development of
dynamic lighting control systems and the
incorporation of automated image analysis tools to
streamline the inspection process and improve the
reliability of defect detection. The integration of
advanced lighting systems and adaptive technologies
can further enhance the capabilities of ROVs, enabling
more efficient and effective underwater inspections.
Moreover, without real-time knowledge of Rrs and
turbidity, visual navigation and inspection become
compromised, leading to false negatives in defect
detection or navigation errors. Therefore, deploying in
situ sensors capable of measuring Rrs and turbidity
profiles at multiple depths can inform lighting
configuration (e.g., selecting appropriate LED spectra)
and camera exposure settings.
REFERENCES
[1] Jason D. Bakos, Chapter 4 - Memory optimization and
video processing, Editor(s): Jason D. Bakos, Embedded
Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, 2016, Pages 147-185, ISBN
9780128003428, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800342-8.00004-3
[2] https://www.chasing.com/en/chasing-m2.html
[3] Freda W. Comparison of the spectral-angular properties
of light scattered in the Baltic Sea and oil emulsions. J
Europ Opt Soc Rap Public. 2014;9:14017. doi:
10.2971/jeos.2014.14017
[4] Freda W, Piskozub J. Revisiting the role of oceanic phase
function in remote sensing reflectance. Oceanologia.
2012;54:2938. doi: 10.5697/oc.54-1.029
[5] Haule K, Kubacka M, Toczek H, Pranszke B, Freda W.
Correlation between Turbidity and Inherent Optical
Properties as an Initial Recognition for Backscattering
Coefficient Estimation. Water (Switzerland).
2024;16(4):594.
[6] Kowalczuk P, Olszewski J, Darecki M, Kaczmarek S.
Empirical relationships between coloured dissolved
organic matter (CDOM) absorption and apparent optical
properties in Baltic Sea waters. Int J Remote Sens.
2005;26(2):345370. doi: 10.1080/01431160410001720270
[7] Kosiek J, Kaizer A, Salomon A, Sacharko A. Analysis of
Modern Port Technologies Based on Literature Review.
TransNav, the International Journal on Marine
Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation.
2021;15(3):667674. doi: 10.12716/1001.15.03.22
482
[8] Lednicka B, Kubacka M, Freda W, Ficek D, Sokólski M.
Multi-Parameter Algorithms of Remote Sensing
Reflectance, Absorption and Backscattering for Coastal
Waters of the Southern Baltic Sea Applied to Pomeranian
Lakes. Water (Switzerland). 2023;15(15):2843.
[9] Lednicka B, Otremba Z, Piskozub J. Light Penetrating the
Seawater Column as the Indicator of Oil Suspension
Monte Carlo Modelling for the Case of the Southern Baltic
Sea. Sensors. 2023;23(3):1175.
[10] Lednicka B, Otremba Z, Piskozub J. Modelling the
upwelling radiance detected in a seawater column for oil-
in-water emulsion tracking. Scientific Reports.
2023;13(1):23098.
[11] Lednicka B, Otremba Z, Piskozub J. Vector irradiance
modelling in a seawater column for assessing the
detection capabilities of an oil-in-water emulsion. Optics
Express. 2024;32(17):2942429435.
[12] Lousada SA, Camacho RF, Palacios JS. Underwater
Technical Inspections Using ROV Applied to Maritime
and Coastal Engineering: The Study Case of Canary
Islands. 2021 Jan 7. In: IntechOpen [Internet]. Available
from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/74726
[13] NOAA Ocean Explorer. [Internet]. Available from:
https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov
[14] Petzold TJ. Volume scattering functions for selected
ocean waters. Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Report. 1972; SIO 72-78.
[15] Piskozub J, McKee D. Effective scattering phase
functions for the multiple scattering regime. Optics
Express. 2011;19(5):47864794. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.004786
[16] Tingting Tao, Cheng Ji, Chengyu Han, Jingde Wang, Wei
Sun, Study on the noise contents of different
measurements in industrial process and their impact on
process monitoring, Computer Aided Chemical
Engineering. 2022; 51:1057-1062. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-
95879-0.50177-6
[17] Woźniak SB, Meler J, Stoń-Egiert J. Inherent optical
properties of suspended particulate matter in the
southern Baltic Sea in relation to the concentration,
composition and characteristics of the particle size
distribution; new forms of multicomponent
parameterizations of optical properties. Journal of Marine
Systems. 2022;229:103720.
[18] Venkatesh V, Kodoth K, Jacob AA, Upadhyay V,
Jhunjhunwala T, Rajagopal P, Ali MN, Balasubramaniam
K. Non-Destructive Testing of Quay Walls Using
Submersible Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV) In
Waterways Around the North Sea Coast. OCEANS 2022
- Chennai, 2022:16, doi:
10.1109/OCEANSChennai45887.2022.9775419
[19] Žaglinskis J, Noreikaitė E. The Application of an
Underwater Robot for the Creation of a Database for the
Technical Inspection of the Underwater Components of
Water Transport and Infrastructure. TMT. 2024; 3:182-96.
doi: 10.56131/tmt.2024.3.1.259