831
1 INTRODUCTION
The availability of adequate mathematical models of
the propulsive ship complex is of crucial importance
in the development of effective ship control systems,
the construction of high-quality simulators, and in the
study of the ship's behavior during maneuvering.
Many works are devoted to the construction and
application of mathematical models of the propulsive
ship complex [1 - 23].
One of the important components of the non-
inertial forces and moments acting on the ship are the
forces and moments caused by the operation of the
ship's rudders, the study of which, in particular, is
devoted to works [24 - 31]. The study of the operation
of ship rudders is based on the processing of
experimental data of model and field tests [2, 3, 25, 26,
28, 29]. Recently, due to the rapid development of
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods, the
Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method
has been widely used to solve this problem [27, 30,
31]. Both approaches complement each other and are
used to determine the distribution of hydrodynamic
forces on the rudders, which is the basis for obtaining
mathematical models of these forces with their further
consideration in the general mathematical models of
the ship's propulsive complex. To build mathematical
models of ship rudders at the first stage, it is
necessary to have adequate mathematical models of
hydrodynamic forces and moment on an isolated
rudder in an unbounded flow. Mainly, linear
approximations of the specified forces are known and
widely used [2, 3, 7 - 17], which use only the first
hydrodynamic derivative and sufficiently accurately
describe their behavior at small angles of attack of the
flow on the rudder, but do not take into account, in
particular, the tangent component. Presentations of
the components of the resulting hydrodynamic force
on the rudder are also known [3, 29], which can be
Analysis of Known and Construction of New
M
athematical Models of Forces on a Ship's Rudder in
an
Unbounded Flow
O
. Kryvyi, M. Miyusov & M. Kryvyi
National University “
Odessa Maritime Academy”, Odessa, Ukraine
ABSTRACT: The forces arising on the ship's rudder at different angles of attack in an unbounded flow are
investigated. The components of the resulting force on the rudder are represented in terms of the rudder lift and
drag forces, as well as in terms of the normal and tangential forces on t
he rudder. The well-known
mathematical models of hydrodynamic rudder coefficients are analyzed, and their disadvantages are found.
New mathematical models of hydrodynamic coefficients have been obtained, in particular, the coefficients of
rudder lift and d
rag, which take into account the aspect ratio of the rudder, its relative thickness and can be
applied to any angle of attack of the flow on the rudder. On specific examples for rudders of the NACA series,
the adequacy of the proposed models and their consistency with known experimental studies are illustrated. It
is shown how the rudder lift and drag change, as well as the components of the resulting force for the
maximum possible range of changes in the local drift angle and the rudder angle.
http://www
.transnav.eu
the
International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 17
Number 4
December 2023
DOI: 10.12716/1001.17.04.
09
832
used for a wider range of changes in the phase
coordinates of the ship's motion, but they require
clarification and further development.
The aim of this work is the construction and
numerical analysis of adequate mathematical models
of forces on ship rudders in an unbounded flow,
which would, on the one hand, cover a sufficiently
wide range of changes in the local drift angle and the
rudder angle, and on the other hand, would be
convenient for use in solving various problems of
dynamics of the ship's propulsive complex.
2 VESSEL AND RUDDER SPECIFICATIONS
The geometric and technical characteristics of the ship
and the rudder will be denoted as follows: L length
of the ship on waterline; B breadth of the ship on
waterline; T amidships draft,
ρ
mass density of
sea water, C
b block coefficient; W=CbLBT
displacement volume of the ship;
D
S LT= σ
area of
the underwater part of the centerplane of the ship’s
hull;
reduced coefficient of the underwater
centerplane of the ship. On modern ships, depending
on their purpose, different types of rudders are used.
On ocean-going ships single rudders are usually used
behind single propellers, which are located in the
centerplane. The rudders may differ in the type of
projection on the centerplane, namely rectangular or
trapezoidal; according to the method of fastening:
simplex rudder, spade rudder, semi-balanced (semi-
spade) rudder; according to the profile shape: NACA,
CAHI, NEZ, HSVA, IFS, Wedge, etc. A detailed
classification of ship rudders is presented, in
particular, in [29, 30]. Let us dwell in detail on those
characteristics of ship rudders that are used in the
construction of mathematical models of
hydrodynamic forces on the rudder. The main
characteristics include the area of the rudder blade S
R,
that is, the area limited by the contour of the
projection of the rudder on the centerplane, as well as
the relative area of the rudder blade
( )
1
RR
S S LT
=
.
For effective control of the ship, depending on the
goals, the relative area of the rudder blade should at
least satisfy the condition [32]

≥+


2
2
0.01 0.5
Rb
B
SC
L
. (1)
When constructing mathematical models of
hydrodynamic forces and moments, it is important to
check the fulfillment of condition (1). For some types
of commercial vessels, Table 2.1 [30, p. 24], shows the
reference ratios of the rudder area to the lateral
underwater area of the ship's hull. The linear
geometric characteristics of the ship's rudders include:
its height h
R , that is, the greatest distance between the
lower and upper edges, as well as the rudder chord b
R
, that is, the distance between the leading edge (nose)
and its trailing edge (tail). Since the ship's rudder is
not rectangular in plan, for example, trapezoidal, then
the value:
1
Rc R R
b Sh
=
is used as the average chord.
The relative thickness value
1
R R Rc
t tb
=
is also
used, where t
R the maximum thickness of the rudder
blade. Modern ocean-going merchant ships usually
use rudder profiles NACA-0012, NACA-0015, NACA-
0018, NACA-0020, NACA-0025, which correspond to
the parameter values: 0.12; 0.15; 0.18; 0.20; 0.25. The
important parameters of the ship's rudder also
include the aspect ratio of the rudder
21 1
R R R R Rc
hS hb
−−
Λ= =
, which shows how many times the
height is greater (or less) than the chord. For marine
merchant ships this figure is
1.5 3÷
, for inland
navigation vessels -
0.5 2.0÷
. Table 1 lists the main
technical characteristics of hulls and ship rudders for
some types of ocean-going merchant ships.
Table 1. Technical parameters of ships and rudders
________________________________________________
Ship KCS, KVLCC2, VLGC, LPG,
Container Tanker Tanker Tanker
ship
________________________________________________
1 2 3 4
________________________________________________
L [m] 230 320 226 147
B [m] 32.2 58 36.6 25.5
T [m] 10.8 20,8 11.8 8.8
C
B 0.65 0,81 0.72 0.74
h
R 9.9 14.32 9.65 6.7
b
Rc 5.5 7.84 4.76 2.87
R
S
0.018 0.01687 0.017 0.01484
Λ
R
1.8 1.827 2.027 2.34
S
R 54.45 115.04 45.934 19.2
________________________________________________
An important parameter of the operation of the
ship's rudder is also the rudder angle
δ
, that is the
angle of deviation of the rudder from the centerplane
of the vessel. The rudder angle is usually considered
positive if it is placed counterclockwise from the
centerplane. The maximum value of this angle is
limited by the design features of the vessel and,
usually, for merchant vessels
max
35
°
δ=
. This should
be taken into account when mathematically modeling
the operation of ship's rudders. The operation of the
ship's rudder is also affected by the value of the
dimensionless Reynolds number on the rudder:
1
Re
R Rc
vb
= µ
, where
R
v
the value of the flow
velocity on the rudder,
µ
the kinematic viscosity of
the sea water. Based on the definition of the number
Re, its value for each specific vessel depends on the
speed of the vessel and is in the range
57
2 10 10⋅÷
.
833
3 HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES ON AN ISOLATED
RUDDER IN AN UNBOUNDED FLOW
Consider the hydrodynamic forces on an isolated
rudder in an unbounded flow, that is, on a rudder
that is not affected by the ship's hull and the
propeller. To study the hydrodynamic forces on such
rudder, let's introduce the left Cartesian coordinate
system
** *
DX Y Z
(Fig. 1), where D the point of action
of the resultant hydrodynamic force
R
P
on the
rudder, and the axis
Z
is directed perpendicularly
upwards to the horizontal section of the rudder. The
resultant force on the rudder
R
P
arises due to
shifting the rudder to an angle
δ
and flow on the
rudder with a velocity
R
v
at an angle
R
to the
axis
X
. In the introduced coordinate system, the
angle
R
, which can be considered the local angle of
drift on the rudder, and the rudder angle
δ
, will be
positive if viewed counterclockwise. The angle of
attack on the rudder is called the angle between the
chord of the rudder and the direction of flow on the
rudder, i.e. the difference between the rudder angle
and the local drift angle (Fig. 1):

RR
. (2)
If the angle of attack
α
R
is positive, then the
deviation of the rudder chord from the line of the flow
occurs counterclockwise, in the opposite case,
clockwise. In the flat Cartesian coordinate system, the
resultant force on the rudder allows expression



**
R YX X Y
P P P Pi Pj
, (3)
where
i
and
j
are the unit vectors in the given
coordinate system. The values of the longitudinal
X
P
and transverse
Y
P
components of the resulting force
on the rudder are to be determined. Specifically, these
components are taken into account in the general
mathematical models of the dynamics of the ship's
propulsion complex. Usually, the components
X
P
and
Y
P
are represented in terms of the magnitude of
the lift and the drag on the rudder, or the magnitude
of the normal force
N
P
and the tangential force
S
P
on the rudder. Let's establish a connection between
the indicated parameters, for this we consider two
more Cartesian coordinate systems associated with
the rudder:
L DD
and
N DS
. The first of these
systems is formed by turning the system
X DY
through an angle
β,
R
the second - by turning it
through an angle
δ
counterclockwise (see Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Forces on an isolated rudder
The resultant force
R
P
in the created coordinate
systems allows the following expressions:
in the coordinate system
L DD
:



R LD L D
P P P Pi P j
, (4)
in the coordinate system
N DS



R NS N S
P P P P i Pj
. (5)
In formulas (4) - (5)
i
and
j
are the unit vectors
in the corresponding coordinate system.
Representations (3) (5) and the transformation
formulas when the coordinate axes are rotated make it
possible to express the values of the longitudinal and
transverse components of the resultant force
R
P
through the components
(, )
LD
PP
and
( ,)
NS
PP
:
= β⋅ + β⋅
= β⋅ β⋅
sin cos
cos sin
X RL RD
Y RL RD
P PP
P PP
, (6)
= δ⋅ + δ⋅
= δ⋅ δ⋅
sin cos
cos sin
XNS
Y NS
PPP
P PP
. (7)
It is not difficult to establish the following
relationship between the components
(, )
LD
PP
and
( ,)
NS
PP
:
= α⋅ + α⋅
= α⋅ α⋅
sin cos
cos sin
D RN RS
L RN RS
PPP
PPP
. (8)
When studying hydrodynamic forces on a ship's
rudder, dimensionless hydrodynamic coefficients of
transverse and longitudinal forces, lift and drag, as
well as normal and tangential forces on the ship's
rudder are usually introduced:
834




**
222
2 22
222
,,
22
2
,,
YXL
YR XR LR
RR RR RR
NS
D
DR NR SR
RR RR RR
PPP
CCC
vS vS vS
PP
P
CCC
vS vS vS
(9)
At the same time, the dimensionless coefficient of
the resultant force can be expressed as follows
22
2
22 2 2


*
**
( )( )
R
R YR XR
RR
LR DR NR SR
P
C CC
vS
CC C C
. (10)
Taking into account representations (9), relations
(6) - (8) will be rewritten as follows
= β⋅ + β⋅
= β⋅ β⋅
*
*
sin cos
cos sin
XR R LR R DR
YR R LR R DR
CCC
C CC
, (11)
= δ⋅ + δ⋅
= δ⋅ δ⋅
sin cos
cos sin
XR NR SR
YR NR SR
CCC
C CC
. (12)
= α⋅ + α⋅
= α⋅ α⋅
sin cos
cos sin
DR R NR R SR
LR R NR R SR
CCC
CCC
. (13)
The ratio

L LR
L
D DR
PC
k
PC
is called the
coefficient of hydrodynamic quality of the rudder
blade [2, 3], and the inverse value
1
D
L
k
k
is called
the coefficient of the inverse quality of the rudder
blade. We will also introduce the coefficient of
tangential force
=
SR
S
NR
С
k
C
, which determines the
effect of the tangential component of the force on the
rudder. The coefficients k
L
, k
D
and k
S
are functions of
the aspect ratio of the rudder blade. Let's establish the
relationship between the coefficients k
L, kD and kS, for
this, by dividing the second equality in (13) by the
first, we get
α− α
=
α+ α
cos sin
sin cos
RS R
L
RS R
k
k
k
, (14)
From here we get the following representation
α− α
=
α+ α
cos sin
sin cos
RL R
S
RL R
k
k
k
. (15)
Denote by
ϕ=tg
DL
k
,
ϕ=tg
NS
k
, where
ϕ
D
,
ϕ
N
respectively, the angles between vectors
D
P
,
N
P
and the resulting vector
R
P
, then from relations
(14), (15), we obtain the representation
= α = α ctg( ), ctg( )
L RN S RD
kk
. (16)
Coefficients k
L, kD and kS make it possible to
represent expressions (11), (12) and (13) as
*
*
(sin cos )
(cos sin )
= β+ β
= β− β
XR LR R D R
YR LR R D R
CC k
CC k
; (17)
*
*
(sin cos )
(cos sin )
XR NR D
YR NR D
CC k
CC k
= δ+ δ
= δ− δ
; (18)
*
*
(sin cos )
(cos sin )
DR NR R D R
LR NR R D R
CC k
CC k
= α+ α
= α− α
. (19)
According to Figure 1, the angle between the
vector of the resultant hydrodynamic force
R
P
and
the vector
Y
P
is equal to the sum of the rudder
angle
δ
and the angle
ϕ
N
. This makes it possible to
represent the dimensionless coefficients of the
transverse and longitudinal forces of the rudder
through the dimensionless coefficient of the resulting
force
R
C
:
= δ+ϕ
= δ+ϕ
*
*
sin( )
cos( )
XR R N
YR R N
CC
CC
. (20)
When building a general mathematical model of
the ship's propulsive complex, dimensionless
hydrodynamic coefficients of the transverse and
longitudinal forces
*
YR
C
and
*
XR
C
on the rudder are
used. To determine them, you can use the following
three approaches:
1. use representations (11) or (17), if mathematical
models for rudder lift coefficient C
LR and drag
coefficient C
DR are known (or instead of CDR,
coefficient of inverse quality of the rudder k
D);
2. use representations (12) or (18), if mathematical
models for the coefficients of normal force C
NR and
tangential force C
SR on the rudder are known (or
instead of C
SR, coefficient of tangential force kS);
3. use representations (20), if mathematical models for
(, )
LD
PP
or for
( ,)
NS
PP
are known.
4 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING MATHEMATICAL
MODELS OF HYDRODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS
ON THE RUDDER
When building mathematical models of ship rudders,
it is important to know the critical value of the angle
835
of attack on the rudder
α
Rk
, i.e., the angle of attack at
which the stall occurs on the rudder blade and its lift
is sharply reduced. The set of values of angles of
attack
α ≤α
R Rk
is called pre-critical, and the set of
values
α
R Rk
is called supercritical. The angles
±α
Rk
are actually the angles of the maximum value
of the rudder lift coefficient C
LR, while the angle of
maximum efficiency has a slightly smaller value, due
to the increase in the rudder drag coefficient C
DR. It
should also be noted that the value of the angle
α
Rk
for the rudder located in the propeller slipstream
increases on average by
15 20÷

. The angle
α
Rk
depends on the technical characteristics of the rudder,
in particular its aspect ratio, to determine its values
using experimental data [2, 3], we obtain table 2.
Table 2. Dependence of the critical value of the
angle of attack
α
Rk
[deg] from the aspect ratio
Λ
R
________________________________________________
Λ
R
0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 2 3 5
α
Rk
45.5 41 36 30.5 25.5 23.75 19.5 16.7
________________________________________________
Based on these data, with the help of regression
analysis, we will get the following representation
0.356
29.6824 .
αΛ=
Rk R
(21)
Experimental studies [2, 3, 26] show that the
rudder lift coefficient C
LR and the rudder drag
coefficient C
DR depends to varying degrees on the
shape, thickness of the rudder, Reynolds number, but
most of all on the rudder aspect ratio
Λ
R
and the
angle of attack of the flow on the rudder
α
R
. In
particular, for small to critical angles of attack, a linear
approximation of the lift coefficient is used, i.e., a
Taylor series expansion along the angle of attack:
()
0
(0)
(
α ) ) α (0) (0) α )
!
j
j
LR R R R R R
j
f
С f ff o
j

.
In this case, only the second term is used. The first
is equal to zero:
() ()0 00
LR
f
С
, due to physical
considerations, therefore
α
LR LR R
СС

. (22)
To designate the hydrodynamic derivative
0
R
LR
LR
R
d
С
С
d
, one can use the formula [2, 3]:
2
2
,
24
π
Λ
=
+Λ+
R
LR
R
С
(23)
or Prandtl's improved formula
0
2
,
2
πκ
Λ
=
R
LR
R
С
(24)
where
2=
d
С
is the coefficient for spade and semi-
spade rudders of marine vessels.
For a wider range of the angle of attack, the
following formula is known [2]
2
sinα sin α cos α ,
=⋅+
LR LR R d R R
СС С
(25)
where
=
2
d
С
for conventional rudders and
1.2 1.5
d
С = ÷
for rudders with rounded side
projections.
The following formula can be used for the rudder
drag coefficient [3]:
= + +⋅
23
0
sin α sin α
DR D D R d R
С СK С
, (26)
where
0
(0.0221 0.0023lgRe)=
D
СC
. The coefficients
()=

R
C Ct
and
(
Λ)
DR
K
are determined using graphs
[3]. Note that at
α0=
R
, as a rule, the value of the drag
force coefficient is chosen approximately:
0
0.014
D
С
.
There are also other representations [29] for the lift
and drag coefficients of the rudder, also obtained on
the basis of experimental data processing:

2
Λ 0.7)
2 sinα sinα sinα cosα
(Λ 1.7)
RR
LR R Q R R R
R
СC
(27)

2
3
0
sinα
Λ
LD
DR Q R D
R
C
С CC
(28)
0
2
0.075
2.5
(lg Re 2)
D
C
.
The authors of the model recommend taking the
value of the constant
equal to one:
1
Q
C
.
Within the framework of the second approach [7,
8], a linear approximation of the normal force
coefficient takes place. Under the assumptions of
smallness
α
R
, the dependence is represented not by
the angle of attack
α
R
, but by its sinus
sinα
R
, i.e.
sinα
NR NR R
CC

. (29)
Empirical representation is used to calculate the
hydrodynamic derivative of the normal force:

0
6.13Λ
Λ 2.25
R
NR
R
NR
RR
dС
С
d
. (30)
It should be noted that in this case the value of the
tangential force on the rudder is neglected:
0
SR
C
.
Using the methods of direct numerical modeling
RANS [30], representations (22) and (29) are
somewhat improved by taking into account the
relative thickness of the rudders

Λ
( sin α)
Λ 2.25
R
LR L R L
R
С sc
. (31)

Λ
( sinα)
Λ 2.25
R
DR D R D
R
С sc
. (32)

Λ
( sinα)
Λ 2.25
R
NR N R N
R
С sc
. (33)
836
The constants in representations (31) - (33),
depending on the relative thickness
R
t
, are given in
Table 4.2 [30, p. 89] for some types of ship's rudders.
Studies of representations for hydrodynamic
coefficients on a ship's rudder have shown significant
shortcomings of existing models. In particular,
representations (22), (29) and (31) - (32) can be applied
only at small to critical drift angles, while
representations (31), (33) can be considered more
accurate, where the relative thickness of the rudder is
taken into account. In representations (25), (26) and
(32), the properties of the oddness of the lift coefficient
and the parity of the drag coefficient of the rudder are
violated, so they cannot be used for negative values of
the angle of attack
α
R
on the rudder. In
representations (27) and (28) there are non-
differentiable functions, such as
sinα
R
. Therefore, for
a general description of the behavior of
hydrodynamic coefficients, they are acceptable, but as
the right-hand parts of the differential equations of
the dynamics of the propulsive complex, their use is
incorrect, since in this case the phase coordinates of
the ship's motion will be discontinuous functions.
5 CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF NEW
MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF
HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE COEFFICIENTS ON
THE RUDDER
To eliminate the indicated shortcomings of the
existing mathematical models of hydrodynamic force
coefficients on the rudder, we will search for the lift
force coefficient as follows
χ
= Λ⋅
3
sinα ( ) sin α
LR LR R R R
СС
, (34)
where
χ
Λ()
R
the function of the rudder aspect ratio
Λ
R
is not yet known, which we will determine based
on the following considerations. Representation (34)
must reach a maximum at critical values of the angle
of attack, so the condition must be fulfilled
2
αα
cosα 3 ( ) sin α cosα 0.
α
R kR
LR
LR kR R kR kR
R
dС
С
d
=
χΛ =
(35)
From here
=
χΛ
α arcsin
6( )
LR
kR
R
С
. (36)
Equating this expression and representation (21),
we find the expression for the unknown function
χ
Λ
Λ=
2 0.356
2
()
3s 9.6i
4n( 82 )
LR
R
R
С
(37)
After substituting (37) into (34), we obtain

=⋅−

Λ

3
2 0.356
sin α
sinα.
3sin (2 )9.6824
R
LR LR R
R
СС
(38)
For the hydrodynamic derivative
LR
С
, after
summarizing expressions (23), (24) and (31), with the
help of regression analysis, we obtain the following
representation, which depends both on the aspect
ratio and on the relative thickness of the rudder:
Λ ⋅η
=
()
2.25
R LR
LR
R
t
С
, (39)
η = + ⋅+

2
( ) 50.503 ( ) 11.123 5.638
LR R R
t tt
.
Similarly, for the hydrodynamic derivative of the
normal force on the rudder, the following
representations can be obtained.
Λ ⋅η
=
()
2.25
R NR
NR
R
t
С
, (40)
η = + ⋅+

2
( ) 54.123 ( ) 12.512 5.451
NR R R
t tt
.
To calculate the hydrodynamic drag coefficient on
the rudder, it is proposed to use the following
dependences on the powers of the sine of the angle of
attack
24
0
sin α sin α= + +⋅
DR D D R d R
С СK С
, (41)
where
0
(0.0221 0.0023lgRe)=
D
СC
; for the coefficients
()=

R
C Ct
and
(Λ)
DR
K
, the following expressions
were obtained by regression methods based on
experimental data [2, 3].
2
1.36 4.09 29.36=−+

RR
С tt
. (42)
2
0.856Λ 0.188Λ=
D RR
K
. (43)
Figures 2 and 3 show the dependence of the
hydrodynamic derivatives
LR
С
,
NR
С
, respectively,
on the aspect ratio
Λ
R
at constant values of the
relative thickness, and on the relative thickness
R
t
at
constant values of the aspect ratio. In both figures,
solid lines show the value of the derivative
LR
С
,
dotted lines show the value of the derivative
NR
С
.
Figure 2. Dependence of derivatives
LR
С
,
NR
С
from
Λ
R
837
Figure 3. Dependence of derivatives
LR
С
,
NR
С
from
R
t
In fig. 2 black, red, blue, green, and yellow lines
are obtained, respectively, at values of
0.12; 0.15;
0.18; 0.21; 0.25. In fig. 3 black, red, blue, green, and
yellow lines obtained, respectively, at values of
Λ
R
0.5, 1.0; 1.5; 2.0; 2.5. The three-dimensional figure 4
shows the general picture of the change in the
behavior of the hydrodynamic derivative
LR
С
, from
the change in the values of the rudder aspect ratio
Λ
R
and the relative thickness
R
t
. The obtained
numerical results confirm the adequacy of the
obtained mathematical models (38) and (39), and their
consistency with the known results [27, 30].
In particular, it was confirmed that hydrodynamic
derivatives
LR
С
and
NR
С
do not have significant
differences, but they significantly depend on the
rudder aspect ratio
and relative thickness of the
rudder
R
t
, which must be taken into account when
building mathematical models of hydrodynamic
forces caused by the operation of ship rudders. Figure
5 shows the dependences on the angle of attack on the
rudder
α
R
for the lift coefficient
LR
С
obtained using
the proposed mathematical model (38) (continuous
lines) and using the mathematical model (31) (dotted
lines) for the NACA-0020 rudder. At the same time,
the black, red, blue, green, and yellow lines are
obtained, respectively, at values of the rudder aspect
ratio
Λ
R
of 0.5; 1; 1.5; 2; 2.5.
Figure 4. Dependence of the derivative
LR
С
on
Λ
R
and
R
t
.
Figure 5. Dependencies
LR
С
on the angle of attack
α
R
The given results show that at small values of the
angle of attack of the flow on the rudder
α 15
°
R
,
both models agree well, but at angles
α 15
°
>
R
,
significant differences are observed. According to
model (31), the lift coefficient continues to increase
with the increase in the angle of attack on the rudder,
which does not correspond to the known [2, 3, 25]
results of experimental studies. According to the
proposed model (38), (39), the coefficient
LR
С
for all
rudders reaches a critical value, after which the stall
occurs on the rudder and the lift of the rudder
decreases. Moreover, the greater the rudder aspect
ratio, the smaller the value of the critical angle of
attack. These results are fully consistent with the
results of known experimental studies.
Figure 6 shows a general picture of the behavior of
the lift coefficient
LR
С
depending on the change in
the angle of attack
α
R
on the rudder and the rudder
aspect ratio, surface 1 corresponds to the proposed
mathematical model (38), (39), surface 2 - model (31).
Figure 6. Dependence
LR
С
on
α
R
and
Λ
R
.
838
Figure 7. Dependence
,
LR DR
СС
on
α
R
and
Λ
R
.
Figure 7, using the proposed mathematical models
(38), (39) and (40) - (42), shows the dependences of the
lift coefficient
LR
С
and the drag coefficient
DR
С
of
the rudder on the change in the angle of attack
α
R
on
the NACA-0020 rudder at different values of the
rudder aspect ratio
Λ
R
. Calculations, in particular,
show that when the angle of attack increases, the
coefficient
DR
С
increases, and when
α 15
°
>
R
the
drag of the rudder becomes commensurate with the
lift and it cannot be neglected. It is also noticeable that
the drag of the rudder reaches its maximum value at
aspect ratios
(1.8;2.2),Λ∈
R
and the lift increases when
the aspect ratio of the rudder increases.
The obtained results are in good agreement with
the experimental studies of the lift and the drag of the
rudder. Figures 8, 9 show the dependence of the
hydrodynamic coefficients, respectively, for the
components P
x and Py the resulting force on the
NACA-0020 rudder for a wide range of changes in the
local drift angle
β
R
and the rudder angle
δ
. The
results are obtained using representations (11) and the
obtained dependencies (38), (40). At the same time,
surface 1 in both figures corresponds to the rudder
with aspect ratio
0.5Λ=
R
, surface 2 with aspect
ratio
2
Λ=
R
.
Figure 8. Dependence
YR
С
on
β
R
and
δ
.
Figure 9. Dependence
XR
С
on
β
R
and
δ
.
The results of the calculations show the adequacy
of the obtained mathematical models of the
hydrodynamic coefficients of the resultant force on
the rudder for the maximum possible area of change
in the local drift angle and the rudder angle. The
obtained results make it possible to evaluate the
influence of the drift angle
β
R
and the rudder angle
δ
on the behavior of the coefficients
YR
С
and
XR
С
.
In particular, the lift and the drag of the rudder are
greater if the local drift angle and the rudder angle
have different signs than if these angles have the same
signs. This means that it is easier to turn the ship in
the direction of the ship's drift than in the opposite
direction. In addition, the component
X
P
of the
resultant force
R
P
on the rudder, at drift angles
greater than the rudder angle, will have a negative
sign, that is, the force
*
X
P
acting in the direction of
the ship's movement. The dependence of both forces
on the rudder aspect ratio is also noticeable.
6 CONCLUSIONS
The existing and proposed new effective and
convenient mathematical models for the lift and drag
of the rudder in an unbounded flow for a wide range
of changes in the local drift angle and the rudder
angle and which take into account the rudder
thickness and its aspect ratio are analyzed and
proposed. On the basis of these models, a numerical
analysis of the behavior of the longitudinal and
transverse force on the rudder was carried out for the
maximum possible range of values of the local drift
angle and the rudder angle.
The obtained results will make it possible to build
general adequate mathematical models of the ship's
propulsion complex, in particular, they are decisive
for determining the forces caused by the operation of
the ship's rudders, taking into account the influence of
the propeller and the ship's hull.
839
REFERENCES
[1] Pershytz R. Y.: Dynamic control and handling of the
ship. L: Sudostroenie, 1983
[2] Sobolev G.C.: Dynamic control of ship and automation of
navigation. L.: Sudostroenie, 1976
[3] Gofman A. D.: Propulsion and steering complex and ship
maneuvering. Handbook. L .: Sudostroyenie.1988.
[4] Miyusov M. V.: Modes of operation and automation of
motor vessel propulsion unit with wind propulsors.
Odessa, 1996.
[5] Kryvyi O. F.: Methods of mathematical modeling in
navigation. ONMA, Odessa, 2015.
[6] Kryvyi O. F, Miyusov M. V.: Mathematical model of
movement of the vessel with auxiliary wind-propulsors,
Shipping & Navigation, v. 26, pp.110-119, 2016.
[7] Inoe S., Hirano M., Kijima K.: Hydrodynamic derivatives
on ship maneuvering, Int. Shipbuilding Progress, v. 28,
№ 321, pp. 67-80, 1981.
[8] Kijima K.: Prediction method for ship maneuvering
performance in deep and shallow waters. Presented at
the Workshop on Modular Maneuvering Models, The
Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineering,
v.47, pp.121 130, 1991.
[9] Yasukawa H., Yoshimura Y.: Introduction of MMG
standard method for ship manoeuvring predictions, J
Mar Sci Technol, v. 20, 3752pp, 2015. DOI
10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y
[10] Yoshimura Y., Masumoto Y.: Hydrodynamic Database
and Manoeuvring Prediction Method with Medium
High-Speed Merchant Ships and Fishing, International
Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship
Maneuverability (MARSIM 2012) pp.494-504.
[11] Yoshimura Y., Kondo M.: Tomofumi Nakano, et al.
Equivalent Simple Mathematical Model for the
Manoeuvrability of Twin-propeller Ships under the
same propeller-rps, Journal of the Japan Society of Naval
Architects and Ocean Engineers, v.24, №.0, p.157. 2016,
https://doi.org/10.9749/jin.133.28
[12] Wei Zhang, Zao-Jian Zou: Time domain simulations of
the wave-induced motions of ships in maneuvering
condition, J Mar Sci Technol, 2016, v. 21, pp. 154166.
DOI 10.1007/s00773-015-0340-3
[13] Wei Zhang, Zao-Jian Zou, De-Heng Deng: A study on
prediction of ship maneuvering in regular waves, Ocean
Engineering, v. 137, pp 367-381, 2017,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.oceaneng. 2017.03.046
[14] Erhan Aksu, Erkan Köse: Evaluation of Mathematical
Models for Tankers' Maneuvering Motions, JEMS
Maritime Sci, v.5 №1, pp. 95-109, 2017. DOI:
10.5505/jems.2017.52523
[15] Kang D., Nagarajan V., Hasegawa K. et al:
Mathematical model of single-propeller twin-rudder
ship, J Mar Sci Technol, v. 13, pp.207222, 2008,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-008-0027-0
[16] Shang H., Zhan C., Z. Liu Z.: Numerical Simulation of
Ship Maneuvers through Self-Propulsion, Journal of
Marine Science and Engineering, 9(9):1017, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9091017
[17] Shengke Ni., Zhengjiang Liu, and Yao Cai.: Ship
Manoeuvrability-Based Simulation for Ship Navigation
in Collision Situations, J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 90;
doi:10.3390/jmse7040090
[18] Sutulo S. & C. Soares G.: Mathematical Models for
Simulation of Maneuvering Performance of Ships,
Marine Technology and Engineering, (Taylor & Francis
Group, London), p 661698, 2011
[19] Kryvyi O. F, Miyusov M. V.: “Mathematical model of
hydrodynamic characteristics on the ship's hull for any
drift angles”, Advances in Marine Navigation and Safety
of Sea Transportation. Taylor & Francis Group, London,
UK., pp. 111-117, 2019
[20] Kryvyi O. F, Miyusov M. V.: “The Creation of
Polynomial Models of Hydrodynamic Forces on the Hull
of the Ship with the help of Multi-factor Regression
Analysis”, 8 International Maritime Science Conference.
IMSC 2019. Budva, Montenegro, pp.545-555 http://www.
imsc2019. ucg.ac.me/IMSC2019_ BofP. pdf
[21] Kryvyi O., Miyusov M.V.: Construction and Analysis of
Mathematical Models of Hydrodynamic Forces and
Moment on the Ship's Hull Using Multivariate
Regression Analysis, TransNav, the International
Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea
Transportation, Vol. 15, No. 4,
doi:10.12716/1001.15.04.18, pp. 853-864, 2021
[22] Kryvyi O. F, Miyusov M. V.: Mathematical models of
hydrodynamic characteristics of the ship’s propulsion
complex for any drift angles, Shipping & Navigation, v.
28, pp. 88-102, 2018. DOI: 10.31653/2306-5761.27.2018.88-
102
[23] Kryvyi O. F, Miyusov M. V.: New mathematical models
of longitudinal hydrodynamic forces on the ship’s hull,
Shipping & Navigation, v. 30, pp. 88-89, 2020. DOI:
10.31653/2306-5761. 30. 2020.88-98
[24] Kryvyi O. F, Miyusov M. V., Kryvyi M. O.:
Mathematical modelling of the operation of ship's
propellers with different maneuvering modes, Shipping
& Navigation, v. 32, pp. 71-88, 2021. DOI: 10.31653/2306-
5761.32.2021.71-88
[25] Molland A.F., Turnock S.R.: Wind tunnel investigation
of the influence of propeller loading on ship rudder
performance. Technical report, University of
Southampton, Southampton, UK, 1991
[26] Molland A.F., Turnock S.R.: Further wind tunnel
investigation of the influence of propeller loading on
ship rudder performance. Technical report, University of
Southampton, Southampton, UK, 1992
[27] Molland A.F., Turnock S.R.: Marine rudders and control
surfaces: principles, data, design and applications, 1st
edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2007
[28] Ladson CL (1988) Effects of Independent Variation of
Mach and Reynolds Numbers on the Low-Speed
Aerodynamic Characteristics of the NACA 0012 Airfoil
Section. Technical report, Langley Research Center,
Hampton, Virginia, USA, 1988
[29] Bertram, V. Practical Ship Hydrodynamic, 2nd ed.;
Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2012; p.
284.
[30] Liu J.: Mathematical Modeling of Inland Vessel
Maneuverability Considering Rudder Hydrodynamics,
2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47475-1_4
[31] Shin Y-J, Kim M-C, Kang J-G, Kim J-W. Performance
Improvement in a Wavy Twisted Rudder by Alignment
of the Wave Peak. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(20):9634.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209634 (CDF)
[32] Veritas D.N.: Hull equipment and appendages: stern
frames, rudders and steering gears. Rules for
Classification of Steel Ships, pp 628, part 3, chapter 3,
section 2, 2000