759
1 INTRODUCTION
The first cases of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which directly
causes COVID-19 respiratory disease, were reported in
the city of Wuhan in the People's Republic of China. On
the 30. January 2020 WHO declared a public health
emergency of international concern in connection with
the spreading of COVID-19 epidemic. Nowadays,
when the globalization phenomenon becomes present
almost all over the world, the possibility of free
movement of people has led to an increase in the range
of impact of the new virus, which like influenza,
smallpox or angina, is transmitted by droplets
(through sneezing and coughing). As a result, the
epidemic turned into a pandemic, as its range extended
beyond China and the Asian continent and covered
almost all the continents. Vaccinations aimed at
reducing the number of new cases of COVID-19,
although they do not fully guarantee that the
vaccinated person will not be able to carry the SARS-
CoV-2 virus. As for the treatment of this disease, there
is as yet no approved treatment for it, only fighting off
COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Global Liner Shipping
Company Employee Work Digitalization
A. Przybyłowski
1
, M. Suchanek
2
& P. Miszewski
3
1
Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland
2
University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
3
Global Liner
Shipping Company ‘X’, Gdynia, Poland
ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic that began to spread across the world in 2020 still poses a
threat not only to human life and health, but also to the global economy. This situation led to the breakdown of
many supply chains, and this could have resulted in the collapse of the international exchange of goods. The
COVID-19 affected the shipping industries development: shipping operators, port operators, government
authorities, shippers, seafarers, passengers, supply chain operators and others. The paper presents the impact of
the pandemic on the working model throughout the results of a survey conducted among the office employees
of a shipowner company being one of the leaders in the maritime container transport sector. It aimed to
investigate the effects of the pandemic as regards the management and organisation processes in the light of
digital transformation within this enterprise. Employees were asked to express their opinion on the advantages
and disadvantages of the remote work and its influence on the way they performed their duties. At the beginning,
employees were most affected by the lack of direct contact with colleagues. At the same time, many of them
declared that after the end of the pandemic, they would like to combine the remote and office work . The
hypothesis of this research reads as follows: as a reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new working model has
been created allowing the continuity and the efficiency of operations in the maritime container sector, therefore
ensuring the resilience within the global supply chains. The results prove that the transition of office workers to
remote digitalised working mode allowed the company to continue operating efficiently during the first phase of
the pandemic. Actually, this new mode, which was initially meant to be only a temporary solution, has become
the dominant form or a combination with the traditional mode of work, creating a kind of hybrid version working
model in the company.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 16
Number 4
December 2022
DOI: 10.12716/1001.16.04.18
760
the symptoms and supporting the functioning of the
body.
Numerous shocks test the resilience and
adaptability of the shipping industry and container
sector itself. The COVID-19 affected the shipping
industries development: shipping operators, port
operators, government authorities, shippers, seafarers,
passengers, supply chain operators and others. It had
an impact on the world trade, because it contributed to
the breakdown of many supply chains, which was
caused by downtime or even production stoppages
(fig. 1).
Figure 1 International maritime trade, world gross domestic
product (GDP) and maritime trade-to-GDP ratio, 2006 to 2021
(percentage annual change and ratio)
Source: https://unctad.org/news/maritime-trade-weathers-
covid-19-storm-faces-far-reaching-knock-effects, 2022-11-10.
At that time, it became even clearer how important
transport is to maintaining the international flow of
goods. The continued functioning of maritime
transport was particularly important, as it is used in the
flow of approx. 80% of cargo in the entire world trade
by volume and more than 70% by value [1].
Therefore, the operation of shipowners
transporting containers [2], which constitute the third
largest cargo group handled by sea transport [3], is also
important. The activities of such a shipowner can be
divided into two separate but closely related aspects.
One of them is the physical transport of cargo, and the
other is the handling of these services from the
organizational side, i.e. office work. Both the work that
the shipowner performs on ships and in offices was
affected by the pandemic and the related restrictions.
However, in order to maintain the circulation of goods
during a pandemic, transport service providers must
not be restricted so that they cannot provide their
services [4], [5].
The changes observed and the strategic behavior of
the market players involved reveal that further
adaptation mechanisms, such as slow steaming,
economies of scale, and capacity management, have
been applied differently between the financial crisis
and COVID-19, resulting in different outcomes. For an
external shock such as COVID-19, impacts are the
outcome of how ports and the shipping industry fit
within complex supply chains [6] and the cargo
composition handled by ports [7][9].
To face such difficult challenges [10], management
policies must take into account the infrastructure, work
and engagement sectors required to be fast and
appropriate. It is crucial to apply crisis management, so
that the main things that must be prioritized can be
found. Among them we can find cost optimization,
implementation of digital technology and the use of
data as a direct business enabler, and also innovative
solutions, such as unmanned aerial system (UAS)
technology reducing operational costs, human risk,
environmental impact, and delivery time [11][13].
At the same time, seaports need to maintain
resilience through the pandemic by building risk
management plans and expanding the circle of
cooperation regionally and globally, not only within
the port, but also including the maritime supply chains
[14]. The research study results conducted in the Polish
seaports revealed that the terminals extent of
engagement and tactical decisions related to the
pandemic were depended on the type of terminal
(universal or specialised) and its main function playe
within a supply chain [15]. As regards the shipping
management perspective, the industry experienced
issues such as crew changing, trade contraction and the
expiration of shipping certificates [16].
The lessons learned from the second pandemic
wave indicate that companies are expected to begin
searching for a more diversified supplier base in the
near term, thus looking to build a versatile, but cost-
effective, supply chain. Shifting supply chains nearby,
decreasing the suppliers base, increasing the
digitalization of supply chains are essential tactics
companies have to start committing to [17].
One should also remember about socio-economic
COVID-19 consequences, threat to the existence and to
the physical and mental health, especially during the
first phase of the pandemic [18], [19]. Also, the key to
success may be an organizational elasticity as a
framework to manage the long-term organizational
impact of the current pandemic [20]. According to
some research results, the three-dimensional nature of
employee well-being may include : workplace
relationships, health, and worklife balance [21].
A framework for operations and supply chain
management at the times of COVID-19 pandemic has
been suggested, including six perspectives, namely:
adaptation, digitalization, preparedness, recovery,
ripple effect, and sustainability [22]. Still, there is a
necessity of quick response to crisis situations and
searching for innovative ways to overcome the
operational and financial challenges. The results of
current research pointed also out the critical problem
with the lack of the so-called “Plan B”, helping supply
chains quickly react on disruptions occurring in the
flows [23][27].
Thus, there is still a need for research concerning
theoretical and practical implications for improving
employee's performance through the digitalization of
service organizations and answering the question
whether the coronavirus pandemic is the cause of the
crisis or rather a turning point and a unique
opportunity to develop in a highly competitive
environment [28], [29]. Covid-19 has indeed
accelerated the society’s digital transformation
towards Industry 4.0. Some other research show that
COVID-19 pandemic helped to develop the awareness
about the climate change by demonstrating how the
decrease in economic activity can have a profound
effect on cutting CO2 emissions. At the same time, it
resulted in an enhanced family life and interpersonal
relations contributing to the quality of human capital
and the level of happiness [30][32]. Also, recent
studies concentrate on the relationship between
761
tourism development and the decrease of pollution
levels [33].
When considering the effects of the Covid-19 on the
size of the enterprises, SMEs have more experienced
more difficulties than bigger companies, due to less
customer demand for goods and services, limited
resources and also problems with digitalization. In this
respect, it is interesting to investigate the opportunities
in digital transformation from the perspective of
startups and traditional organisations [34][38]. Other
research focus on the effects of internal marketing
orientation on job satisfaction, and the effects of job
satisfaction on job performance and counterproductive
work behaviors. The results of a study carried out in
Ukraine show that the spread of the COVID-19
pandemic and quarantine restrictions stimulated the
growth of demand for digital technologies to meet the
communication, professional, consumer and economic
needs of the people, contributed to the spread of new
non-standard forms of employment using information
and communication technologies. In the end, for some
it was considered a long-overdue push for
digitalisation, for others it revealed how much their
work was related to printed matter.
Obviously, both sides: employers and employees
with no previous experience of telework have faced the
advantages and drawbacks of this work arrangement.
According to latest research, modification of legal and
contractual regulations is the only factor that has a
weak and insignificant influence on telework. Still,
there is a need of time and resources to meeting the
new challenges created by such fundamental changes
and supporting the displaced workers and monitoring
the new opportunities in the labor market, but most
importantly, it also requires new leadership concepts,
paying special attention to young workers [39], and
individual support for every single employee in the
light of potential precariousness of the workforce [40]
[46]. Without any doubt, New Normal offers a new
playing field which, as some researchers claim
(Gruenwald, 2020), is ‘still not level and tilts like the old
one but it can mean a new start for education and the
economy in a more local than global society’ [47].
There is evidence that people value digital tools and
were able to find methods of effective and efficient
collaboration in distant work environments [48]. What
is more, employers and HR personnel/Consultants
have been challenged to re-think, re-design and think
‘out of the box’ and invent the best practices for
running their businesses and industries, as well as re-
define roles during this turbulence [49]. At the same
time, despite the investments which the European
countries have made in recent years in digital
infrastructure, there are large disparities in terms of
adaptability to telework [50].
Also, in the COVID-19 time, several tendencies are
noted: digitalization, changing the model of mobility,
changing consumer buying habits, infodemic,
increased attention to one's health, hygiene and
healthy lifestyle, changes in interpersonal behavior
[51]. For example, according to some research
(Butkaliuk, 2021), ‘having considered the impact of the
current process of automation, robotization and
digitalization of the global economy, without changing
the socio-economic and political configuration of the
structure of the modern world, the potentially high
utility of the latest achievements of science and
technology will be significantly limited and
subordinated mainly to the economic interests of
capital owners, and will not work for the benefit of all
humanity and social progress’ [52]. One should also be
aware that digital transformation is based on five
different areas: customers, competition, value,
innovation and data [53]. A the same time, aspects of
surveillance and privacy gain in importance with
increased digital usage.
One of the study revealed that remote working has
been used to mitigate the negative impact of the Covid-
19 pandemic on the productivity of organizations and
it was also revealed that the HR managers have
undergone a major change of role in maximizing
productivity, engagement, collaboration, satisfaction
level and work-life balance of the employees. As the
author claims (Roychowdhury, 2021), it was found that
there exists a significant association between the
preference of remote working across gender [54]. Also,
problems of digitalization have been exacerbated and
must be further understood and ameliorated in the
post-COVID world [23][27]. Thus, companies will
face the challenge of combining virtual and physical
working while offering employees an appropriate
working infrastructure. However, the future
consequences for work design remain unclear, as many
companies are still in a state of instability [55]. It will be
also interseting to follow how AI-based algorithms are
used to direct, evaluate and discipline workers, and
how workers respond to these forms of algorithm
management [56].
Meanwhile, ships still have to sail and shipowners
must ensure that these ships can be manned. The
situation is a bit different in the case of office work,
without which the functioning of the enterprise would
also be impossible. The introduced restrictions on
maintaining social distance and limiting movement
forced entrepreneurs to close their offices, which were
places where large numbers of people gathered on a
daily basis. Therefore, employees had to switch to the
so-called remote work, also known as home office. An
example here is a maritime container transport
company X”. It can be assumed that currently all of
its’ offices do not follow the same rules of work
organization, depending on the epidemic situation in a
given country. However, the transition to remote work
of a large number of employees was certainly a
challenge for the company, especially since the success
of this operation depended on its future.
2 RESEARCH METHODS
The aim of the paper was to investigate the effects of
the pandemic as regards management and
organisation processes in the light of digital
transformation taking as a case study a global liner
shipping company. The hypothesis of this research
reads as follows: as a reaction to the COVID-19
pandemic, a new working model has been created
allowing the continuity and the efficiency of operations
in the maritime container sector, therefore ensuring the
resilience within the global supply chains.
In particular, the purpose of quantitative study
carried out using a questionnaire focused on finding
762
out in particular the advantages and disadvantages as
well as the opinions of the company’s office employees
about a new working model: remote work. The
research problem has been therefore the answer to the
question of how well company “X” has adapted to
work in pandemic conditions.
With 253 vessels, 11.9 million TEU transport
volume, around 14,300 employees in more than 400
offices in 137 countries, this enterprise is a leading
global liner shipping company. It offers a fleet with a
Vessel Capacity of 1.8 million TEU, as well as a
Container Capacity of 3.0 million TEU including one of
the world’s largest and most modern reefer container
fleets. A total of 126 liner services worldwide ensure
fast and reliable connections between more than 600
ports on all the continents. The company belongs to the
leading ocean carriers for the trades Transatlantic,
Middle East, Latin America and Intra-America.
The research sample consisted of the employees of
this company, who usually work in the office located
in the city of Gdańsk in Poland. The survey has been
carried out from 22.February 2021 to 01.March .2021
and a total of 124 respondents reacted, which is a
representative research sample of this office.
The questionnaire was prepared via the Google
Survey tool and consisted of fifteen questions. The
respondents also had the opportunity to share their
opinions and thoughts on the pandemic and remote
work by entering a comment into a text field specially
prepared for this purpose. Questions regarding the age
and gender of the respondent were placed at the end of
the questionnaire, but the answers were to be analysed
first to facilitate the subsequent interpretation of the
other results.
The largest group were people aged 26 to 50 (73%
of total), which may indicate that the workforce is
relatively young. For the employer, a factor more
important than the experience, may be the ability to
quickly adapt to changes which is typical of younger
employees. Out of the 124 respondents, 59% were
women and 41% were men. Women have been more
numerous than men in the 18-25 years old group (9%
of total) and 26-50 age groups and in the group for
more than 50 years old (18% of total) men slightly
dominate. A similar relationship can be read by
analysing the answers to the question about experience
at company “X”, and they are presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Respondents’ period of employment in the
company “X”
Source: own elaboration.
Almost a quarter of all respondents have been
working in the aforementioned enterprise for less than
a year, which proves that in a relatively short time the
number of office employees increased by approx. 30%.
It should also be added that these employees were
hired in the period from March 2020 to March 2021. It
was the time when the COVID-19 pandemic was
spreading around the world, but it seems like it did not
thwart the plan to hire new employees.
The fact that the group with 6 or more years of work
experience is the most numerous may indicate that,
contrary to the interpretation presented above, the
experience of employees is important to the employer.
Moreover, the largest age group, which is 26 - 50 years
of age, includes a big number of people with relatively
long work experience, and it should also be taken into
account that these respondents also have an experience
gained in previous jobs.
3 RESULTS
A factor analysis was performed in regards to all the
questions describing the perceived advantages and
disadvantages of remote work during the COVID-19
pandemic. While we assumed that the general
variability of these responses might be similar to each
other, we wanted to verify whether there had been any
underlying attitudes or beliefs, represented by latent
variables (factors). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)
with an extraction by the principal components
methods was chosen so as not to assume underlying
data structure which would be necessary for
confirmatory factor analysis or as a part of structural
equation modelling. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin criterion
of eigenvalues higher than 1 was assumed as the main
criterion regarding the choice of the number of factors
extracted (tab. 1).
Table 1.Factors extracted for the remote work scale
________________________________________________
Variables Factor 1 Factor 2
________________________________________________
Use below scale to evaluate advantages 0.71 -0.08
of remote work (where "5" is the biggest
advantage and "1" is the least important).
[no need to move between the office and
place of residence]
Use below scale to evaluate advantages 0.87 -0.10
of remote work (where "5" is the biggest
advantage and "1" is the least important).
[better organization of the day]
Use below scale to evaluate advantages 0.56 -0.24
of remote work (where "5" is the biggest
advantage and "1" is the least important).
[increased security]
Use below scale to evaluate disadvantages -0.67 -0.05
of remote work (where "5" is the biggest
disadvantage and "1" is the least important).
[no direct contact with other employees]
Use below scale to evaluate disadvantages -0.56 -0.53
of remote work (where "5" is the biggest
disadvantage and "1" is the least important).
[lack of motivation to work at home]
Use below scale to evaluate disadvantages 0.06 -0.88
of remote work (where "5" is the biggest
disadvantage and "1" is the least important).
[higher utility costs (electricity, water, etc.)
________________________________________________
Eigenvalue 2.35 1.13
________________________________________________
Source: own elaboration.
763
Interestingly enough two factors were extracted.
The first one groups the variability of almost all the
statements which were agreed or disagreed upon by
the respondents, i.e. the lack of need to move between
the office and place of residence, the ability to better
organise the day and increase security and on the other
hand no direct contact with other employees or lack of
motivation to work at home, as indicated by factor
loading either higher than 0.55 or lower than -0.55. The
disadvantages present a negative factor loadings while
the advantages have a positive higher loading, which
means that the stronger the advantages had been
perceived by the respondent, the more likely he was
also to strongly assess the disadvantages of remote
working. The only statement which represented a
different variability to the other six was the statement
regarding the assessment of higher utility costs
resulting from working at home. Its variability is the
only one strongly represented in factor 2, as proven by
a factor loading of -0.88. This possibly indicates that
this was a concept without bigger consequences for the
employees. Therefore factor 1 was taken from this
moment on and treated as the representation of the
strength of the perception of advantages and
disadvantages of remote working and underwent
further analysis.
The differences in the strength of perception of
advantages and disadvantages were verified for a
number of categorical variables using analysis of
variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA was used, for
every analysis Cochrane, Hartley and Bartlett tests
were applied to verify the homogeneity of variances. A
critical level of 0.05 was assumed.
The first analysis was performed in regards to the
position of an employee in the enterprise with a p-
value for the ANOVA’s F-test at <0.001 The advantages
and disadvantages were statistically significantly
differently perceived by two groups (as proven by
Bonferonni post-hoc test) students and directors
perceived them milder, whereas regular employees
and mid-level managers perceived significantly
stronger.
This seems to be in line with the results regarding
the time spent in the company (fig. 1). At a significance
level of 0.028 for the F-test, people working in the
company for a period longer than 6 months have much
stronger feeling about advantages of working from
home than the people working very shortly (1-3
months) and people working 4-6 months in the
company.
The ANOVAs with the group division based on
gender or the use of company’s hardware in home
turned out not to present statistically significant
differences. P-values were higher than 0.1 in both
cases. This partially contradicts previous research
which stated that females have stronger feelings
regarding remote working.
As expected, the differences in the perception
turned out to be undoubtedly statistically significant (p
< 0.001) in regards to the expectations for the structure
of work after pandemic. People who expressed the
desire to still work remotely or to combine remote
work or office work had much stronger feelings about
the advantages and disadvantages of remote work
than people who expressed the desire to return to office
work after the pandemic.
There were also strong significant differences
regarding the use of a particular software in mobile
work (p = 0.02), which might indicate differences in
user experience, although in this case, the homogeneity
tests indicated the necessity to reject the null
hypotheses regarding homogenous variances, thus
rendering the results of ANOVA debatable.
Lastly, three variables regarding the perception of
the respondent of how effective the adaptation of the
company to the pandemic situation was in terms of:
communication and information flow,
safety,
hygiene and disinfection standards
were treated as a dependent variable. Main effects
ANOVA was again applied with age, gender, position
in the company and length of experience in the
company being the categorical grouping factors (tab.
2).
Table 2. Results of the ANOVA perception of adaptation
________________________________________________
Communication Safety Hygiene
and information
flow
Variable F p F p F p
________________________________________________
Age 0.142 0.94 0.338 0.677 0.285 0.845
Gender 1.332 0.283 0.34 0.778 0.032 0.846
Position in 4.324 0.292 0.73 0.639 0.53 0.891
the company
Experience at 6.5 0.063 1.826 0.125 3.626 0.123
the company
________________________________________________
Source: own elaboration.
Interestingly enough, there were no significant
differences in regards to either of the three dependent
variables for all the factors. This might indicate that any
variability in this respect is a consequence of other
factors, possibly of more behavioural or attitudinal
character.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The survey research results proved that the company
“X” adjusted quite well to the New Normal in the time
of the pandemic . The greatest advantage of remote
work is the lack of need to move about, which saves
time and money. The biggest disadvantage, in turn, is
the lack of direct contact with other employees, which
the employer tries to remedy by providing a new tool
for internal communication. Employees can perform
their work staying at home, thanks to the fact that the
employer provides them with the necessary equipment
and also technical assistance. The vast majority of
respondents switched to home office when pandemic
started, thanks to which it was possible to maintain
greater security, and the employees themselves also
agreed with this. Remote work is the greatest obstacle
for managers and directors who, due to the lack of
direct contact, are not able to manage their
subordinates equally efficiently, but it can be
concluded that the actions taken by the employer bring
results.
Thanks to the new form of work, the shipowner can
continue to provide services without interruptions or
obstacles, and the home office itself gains in
appreciation from employees. It happens that this new
mode, which was initially meant to be only a
764
temporary solution in the company, has actually
become the dominant form of work or combination
with the traditional mode, creating a kind of hybrid
version. In any case, the results of the study show that
home office works well, although of course it does not
suit everyone. However, possible improvements could
be considered, especially in places indicated by the
employees themselves, and then working from home
could become even more efficient and comfortable.
While our study provides timely analysis, including
insights and lessons learned [57], which can inform
stakeholders on the future pathways, it also contributes
to scholarly discussions by pointing out future research
agendas that could guide further academic
investigations [58][60]. What is more, likewise other
research findings, such analysis may contribute to
strengthening the awareness of COVID-19 and as a
consequence - reduce operational risk and in the end
improve business performance for the maritime related
industries and authorities [61].
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Funding: This research was funded by Gdynia Maritime
UniversityWN/2022/PZ/10 project.
REFERENCES
[1] UNCTAD, COVID-19 and Maritime Transport Impact
and Responses: Transport and Trade Facilitation Series
No. 15, no. 15. 2021.
[2] A. S. Grzelakowski, “Global container shipping market
development and its impact on mega logistics system,”
TransNav, vol. 13, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.12716/1001.13.03.06.
[3] E. Czermański, G. T. Cirella, T. Notteboom, A. Oniszczuk-
Jastrzabek, and B. Pawłowska, “An energy consumption
approach to estimate air emission reductions in container
shipping,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 2, 2021, doi:
10.3390/en14020278.
[4] J. Charłampowicz, Maritime container terminal service
quality in the face of covid-19 outbreak,” Pomorstvo, vol.
35, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31217/p.35.1.10.
[5] A. Oyenuga, “Perspectives on the impact of the COVID-
19 pandemic on the global and African maritime
transport sectors, and the potential implications for
Africa’s maritime governance,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., 2021,
doi: 10.1007/s13437-021-00233-3.
[6] M. Nabipour and M. A. Ülkü, “On deploying blockchain
technologies in supply chain strategies and the covid-19
pandemic: A systematic literature review and research
outlook,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 19.
2021, doi: 10.3390/su131910566.
[7] T. Notteboom, T. Pallis, and J. P. Rodrigue, “Disruptions
and resilience in global container shipping and ports: the
COVID-19 pandemic versus the 20082009 financial
crisis,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 23, no. 2, 2021, doi:
10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5.
[8] D. Kruhlyi, “CONDITION STUDY SHIPPING DURING
THE PANDEMIC,” Collect. Sci. Work. State Univ.
Infrastruct. Technol. Ser. "Transport Syst. Technol., no. 36,
2020, doi: 10.32703/2617-9040-2020-36-15.
[9] JRC European Commision, “Future of Transport : Update
on the economic impacts of COVID -19,” 2020.
[10] C. Doumbia-Henry, “Shipping and COVID-19:
protecting seafarers as frontline workers,” WMU J. Marit.
Aff., vol. 19, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13437-020-00217-9.
[11] H. Prasutiyon and R. . S. Gurning, “STRATEGY
SURVIVELY IN THE MIDDLE OF UNCERTAINITY
PANDEMI COVID-19 MARITIME SECTOR BUSINESS,”
Int. J. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020, doi:
10.21107/ijseit.v5i1.7288.
[12] K. Vedat, “IoT in the OSV sector,” 2020, doi:
10.2118/203222-ms.
[13] N. Sookram, D. Ramsewak, and S. Singh, The
conceptualization of an unmanned aerial system (Uas)
shipshore delivery service for the maritime industry of
trinidad,” Drones, vol. 5, no. 3, 2021, doi:
10.3390/drones5030076.
[14] A. S. Alamoush, F. Ballini, and A. I. Ölçer, “Ports,
maritime transport, and industry: The immediate impact
of COVID-19 and the way forward,” Marit. Technol. Res.,
vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.33175/mtr.2022.250092.
[15] M. Mańkowska, M. Pluciński, I. Kotowska, and L. Filina-
Dawidowicz, Seaports during the covid-19 pandemic:
The terminal operators’ tactical responses to disruptions
in maritime supply chains,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 14, 2021,
doi: 10.3390/en14144339.
[16] J. Y. Chua, R. Foo, K. H. Tan, and K. F. Yuen, “Maritime
resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: impacts and
solutions,” Contin. Resil. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, doi:
10.1108/crr-09-2021-0031.
[17] R. Lahyani, F. Alsaad, L. Merdad, and M. Alzamel,
“Supply chain resilience vs. COVID-19 disruptions
during the second wave,” in Procedia CIRP, 2021, vol.
103, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.10.006.
[18] V. V. SABADASH and D. V. KHARCHENKO, “The
Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on the Economy of
Ukraine: a Sectoral Analysis of the Consequences and
Opportunities for Recovery,” Mech. an Econ. Regul., vol.
2021, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.21272/mer.2021.93.01.
[19] R. Mulić and A. Russo, “THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
AND ITS IMPACT ON THE MARITIME SECTOR IN
CROATIA AND THE WORLD,” 2021.
[20] A. J. Reuschl, M. K. Deist, and A. Maalaoui, “Digital
transformation during a pandemic: Stretching the
organizational elasticity,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 144, 2022, doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.088.
[21] M. Juchnowicz and H. Kinowska, “Employee well-being
and digitalwork during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Inf.,
vol. 12, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.3390/info12080293.
[22] H. Begum, K. Abbas, A. S. A. F. Alam, H. Song, M. T.
Chowdhury, and A. B. Abdul Ghani, “Impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on the environment and
socioeconomic viability: a sustainable production chain
alternative,” Foresight, vol. 24, no. 34, 2022, doi:
10.1108/FS-02-2021-0053.
[23] D. M. Herold, K. Nowicka, A. Pluta-Zaremba, and S.
Kummer, “COVID-19 and the pursuit of supply chain
resilience: reactions and ‘lessons learned’ from logistics
service providers (LSPs),” Supply Chain Manag., vol. 26,
no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.1108/SCM-09-2020-0439.
[24] Ł. Marzantowicz, K. Nowicka, and M. Jedliński, “Smart
„plan b” in face with disruption of supply chains in
2020,” Logforum, vol. 16, no. 4, 2020, doi:
10.17270/J.LOG.2020.486.
[25] R. Demir and A. C. Acar, “Impact of the Global COVID-
19 Pandemic on Human Resource Management Practices
of Businesses,” in The Effects of the Global Pandemic
Process on the Social and Economic Structure and Public
Policies in Combating the Pandemic, 2021.
[26] M. M. Queiroz, D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, and S. Fosso
Wamba, “Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply
chains: mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19
pandemic through a structured literature review,” Ann.
Oper. Res., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03685-7.
[27] S. J. Barnes, “Information management research and
practice in the post-COVID-19 world,” Int. J. Inf. Manage.,
vol. 55, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175.
[28] G. Narayanamurthy and G. Tortorella, “Impact of
COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance
Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies,” Int. J.
Prod. Econ., vol. 234, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108075.
[29] N. Baryshnikova, O. Kiriliuk, and D. Klimecka-Tatar,
“Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector
765
of the economy in the context of the COVID-19
pandemic,” Prod. Eng. Arch., vol. 27, no. 1, 2021, doi:
10.30657/pea.2021.27.2.
[30] J. Moosavi, J. Bakhshi, and I. Martek, “The application of
industry 4.0 technologies in pandemic management:
Literature review and case study,” Healthc. Anal., vol. 1,
2021, doi: 10.1016/j.health.2021.100008.
[31] R. De’, N. Pandey, and A. Pal, “Impact of digital surge
during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and
practice,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 55, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171.
[32] M. DvoŔák, P. Rovný, V. Grebennikova, and M.
Faminskaya, “Economic impacts of Covid-19 on the labor
market and human capital,” Terra Econ., vol. 18, no. 4,
2020, doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-4-78-96.
[33] R. Nagaj and B. Žuromskaitė, “Tourism in the era of
covid-19 and its impact on the environment,” Energies,
vol. 14, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14072000.
[34] M. Andrae, P. Marín-Arraiza, and A. Ferus, “COVID-19
- working in crisis,” VOEB-Mitteilungen, vol. 73, no. 34,
2020, doi: 10.31263/voebm.v73i3-4.5551.
[35] Y. Zaloznova, O. Pankova, and Y. Ostafiichuk, “Global
and Ukrainian Labour Markets in the Face of
Digitalization Challenges and the Threats of the COVID-
19 Pandemic,” Virtual Econ., vol. 3, no. 4, 2020, doi:
10.34021/ve.2020.03.04(6).
[36] M. S. Nemteanu and D. C. Dabija, “The influence of
internal marketing and job satisfaction on task
performance and counterproductive work behavior in an
emerging marketing during the covid-19 pandemic,” Int.
J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 7, 2021, doi:
10.3390/ijerph18073670.
[37] P. Soto-Acosta, “COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting Digital
Transformation to a High-Speed Gear,” Inf. Syst. Manag.,
vol. 37, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461.
[38] I. Hamburg, “Impact of COVID-19 on SMEs and the Role
of Digitalization,” Adv. Res., 2021, doi:
10.9734/air/2021/v22i330300.
[39] B. Ronald and L. Marc, “The leadership challenge in
times of the COVTD 19 pandemic - An empirical
investigation on the impact of transformational
leadership on motivation and team performance,” Adv.
Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, 2021.
[40] L. Lebedeva and O. Moskalenko, “IMPACT OF THE
COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC POLICY,”
Balt. J. Econ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.30525/2256-
0742/2021-7-5-114-122.
[41] P. Lord, “Changing world, changing work,” Contemp.
Soc. Sci., vol. 15, no. 4, 2020, doi:
10.1080/21582041.2020.1812707.
[42] A. Nelke, Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
corporate employer branding,” Tech. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 16,
2021, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v16i1.2436.
[43] M. CătălinaTurkes, A. F. Stăncioiu, and C. A. Băltescu,
“Telework During The Covid-19 Pandemic An
Approach From The Perspective Of Romanian
Enterprises,” Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 23, no. 58, 2021, doi:
10.24818/EA/2021/58/700.
[44] D. R. ORLOVA, Y. S. OTMAKHOVA, and I. A.
PUZYREVA, “Post-pandemic transformation of the labor
market,” Econ. Anal. Theory Pract., vol. 20, no. 4, 2021,
doi: 10.24891/ea.20.4.684.
[45] P. Sanz de Miguel, M. Caprile, and J. Arasanz,
“Regulating telework in a post-COVID-19 Europe,” Eur.
Agency Saf. Heal. Work, 2021.
[46] A. H. Church and S. Ezama, “2 lines Digitalization
Drives the New Face of Engagement: As COVID-19
impacts the nature of work, digitalization and
engagement, talent management will need to change for
the future.,” People Strateg., vol. 43, no. 3, 2020.
[47] H. Gruenwald, “Covid-19 and the New Normal
compared to the Past,” Researchgate.Net, no. October,
2020.
[48] M. Schmidtner, C. Doering, and H. Timinger, Agile
Working during COVID-19 Pandemic,” IEEE Eng.
Manag. Rev., vol. 49, no. 2, 2021, doi:
10.1109/EMR.2021.3069940.
[49] M. Kaushik, “Post COVID-19 World- A Paradigm Shift
at Workplace,” Test Eng. Manag., vol. 83, no. August,
2020.
[50] A. Bălăcescu, A. Pătrascu, and L. M. Păunescu,
“Adaptability To Teleworking In European Countries,”
Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 23, no. 58, 2021, doi:
10.24818/EA/2021/58/683.
[51] H. Voznyak, K. Patytska, and T. Kloba, “THE
INFLUENCE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON
CHANGING THE BEHAVIOR OF ECONOMIC
ENTITIES,” Green, Blue Digit. Econ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, 2021,
doi: 10.30525/2661-5169/2021-2-2.
[52] V. BUTKALIUK, “LABOR IN THE 21ST CENTURY:
CHALLENGES OF POST-FORDISM / NEOLIBERALISM
AND THE SITUATION OF WORKING PEOPLE IN THE
MODERN GLOBAL WORLD,” Sociol. Theory, Methods,
Mark., no. Stmm 2021 (1), 2021, doi:
10.15407/sociology2021.01.060.
[53] M. Travar, I. Dugonjić, and S. Ristić, Accelerated
Process of Digital Transformation - The Impact and
Consequences of Covid-19,” JITA - J. Inf. Technol. Appl.
(Banja Luka) - APEIRON, vol. 22, no. 2, 2021, doi:
10.7251/jit2102116t.
[54] S. Roychowdhury, “ASSESSING IMPACT OF COVID
PANDEMIC ON ROLE TRANSITION AND
EFFECTIVENESS OF REMOTE WORKING IN THE
FACE OF CHALLENGES IN HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT,” 2021.
[55] “The Leap into the New Normal in Creative Work: A
Qualitative Study of the Impact of COVID-19 on Work
Practices in Industrial Companies,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag.,
2021, doi: 10.7176/ejbm/13-10-01.
[56] Y. Griep, I. Vranjes, M. M. L. van Hooff, D. G. J. Beckers,
and S. A. E. Geurts, “Technology in the Workplace:
Opportunities and Challenges,” in Flexible Working
Practices and Approaches, 2021.
[57] G. Faldetta, M. L. Frigotto, A. Lazazzara, M. Marchiori,
M. Pezzillo Iacono, and A. C. Scapolan, “Digital
Technologies within and beyond the Workplace: Impacts,
Ambiguities, and Transformative Trends,” puntOorg Int.
J., vol. 6, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.19245/25.05.pij.6.2.1.
[58] E. Szaruga, Z. Kłosadamkiewicz, A. Gozdek, and E.
Załoga, “Linkages between energy delivery and
economic growth from the point of view of sustainable
development and seaports,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 14,
2021, doi: 10.3390/en14144255.
[59] W. Koznowski and A. Łebkowski, “Analysis of Hull
Shape Impact on Energy Consumption in an Electric Port
Tugboat,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, doi:
10.3390/en15010339.
[60] M. Tarkowski, K. Puzdrakiewicz, J. Jaczewska, and M.
Połom, “COVID-19 lockdown in Poland changes in
regional and local mobility patterns based on Google
Maps data,” Pr. Kom. Geogr. Komun. PTG, vol. 23, no. 2,
2020, doi: 10.4467/2543859xpkg.20.007.12105.
[61] D. Yazır, B. Şahin, T. L. Yip, and P. H. Tseng, “Effects of
COVID-19 on maritime industry: a review,” Int. Marit.
Health, vol. 71, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.5603/IMH.2020.0044.