621
1 INTRODUCTION
One of the inherent features of the maritime industry
is that it often operates in adverse conditions that
include heavy weather, extreme state of the sea and
wind, work at night and in poor visibility, at height or
on slippery surface. If we add other risks, e.g.
insufficient experience, hardworking environment,
watch length, inadequate equipment, inadequate
supervision and other potential risks, it is clear that
undesirable events such as injuries and MOB
situations are likely to arise. Furthermore,
additional risk stems from the fact that, in maritime
shipping, seafarers are often far away from the shore
and cannot be assisted timely in case of accident.
Therefore, considerable efforts are made to prevent
incidents on board and, if they do occur, to report
them to the shore-based services as soon as possible in
order to launch adequate assistance / rescue
operations. Modern crews perform safety drills and
establish safety procedures regularly, safety
equipment is mandatory. Yet, all these measures are
insufficient in MOB (Man Over Board) situations as
the equipment itself does not provide timely alerts [4].
One of the measures for increasing the safety of
on-board staff is the application of the personal
locator transmitter, which makes part of the broad
family of MSLD (Maritime Survivor Locating
Devices) devices. The purpose of these personal
locators is alerting and/or reporting the position of the
persons who accidentally fall over board and are
unable to return to the vessel or offshore structure by
themselves. Since the chances of survival in the sea
are directly related to the time spent in the water [8],
it is necessary to detect the MOB situation and launch
the search and rescue (SAR) operation as soon as
possible. In the event the crew fail to respond timely,
additional MOB situation requirements include [9]:
Ensure the way of reporting the MOB situation to
the maritime rescue coordination centres and other
vessels in the vicinity,
Application of Radio Beacons in SAR Operations
M. Bakota, Z. Lušić & D. Pušić
University of Split
, Split, Croatia
ABSTRACT: This research features an overview of the available PLB technologies, their advantages,
shortcomings and areas of their optimum application. A test of the locator transmitter emitting both 406 MHz
AIS and 121.5 MHz signals was performed with a focus on tracking the homing 121.5 MHz signal. The
efficiency of the homing signal was examined by using two separate radio locating systems. One of them
comprised multi-purpose and widely available components and programs, while the other was a specialised
radio beacon system with dedicated components. In addition to the results, their analysis and evaluation of
efficiency, the paper discusses the applicability of the available PLB technologies and provides guidelines for
adequate selection of the PLB devices and position indicating radio equipment.
http://www.transnav.eu
the
International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 14
Number 3
September 2020
DOI:
10.12716/1001.14.03.13
622
Ensure the means of defining the MOB position
without compromising the GMDSS (Global
Maritime Distress and Safety System),
Ensure the way of updating the MOB position
without compromising the GMDSS.
While the use of PLBs (Personal Locator Beacon) is
mandatory in all offshore helicopter transport
operations in most European countries [15], their use
on offshore structures and vessels under way remains
optional.
PLB devices apply a number of technologies since
these devices are not used just in maritime industry.
The use of PLBs is mandatory in air transport (ELT
(Emergency Locator Transmitter) is a basic locating
beacon designed specifically for use on general
aviation aircraft; in certain situations, PLB and EPIRB
devices may be installed as well) and their use is
encouraged in a range of activities on land, e.g.
mountaineering, expeditions, and the like. Today,
PLB devices are widely available and they greatly
vary in price and terms of service (subscription,
prepayment), and in cost of activating the
search/rescue service (free or not). Moreover, there are
variations in consequences in case of false alarms
(potentially sparing the beacon’s owner from
significant false alert fines). Finally, there are various
degrees of individualisation, i.e. the beacon may or
may not be registered to a specific person, and the
very devices are quite different regarding the search
precision, response time, range, reliability, etc.
The purpose of this research was to establish the
efficiency of tracking the locator’s homing signal
transmitted on 121.5 MHz. The procedure included
two separate antenna systems featuring adequate
receivers and programs for processing the 121.5 MHz
signal. The distance from the PLB was measured to
establish the reception range and the quality of the
signal that allowed to pinpoint the beacon’s location.
2 TYPES OF TECHNOLOGIES APPLIED IN
PERSONAL LOCATOR BEACONS
The requirements of PLB devices in the modern
maritime industry are primarily based on the
requirements of the offshore industries that regulate
the PLBs in transfers from ship to ship and from
helicopter/vessel to offshore structure, depending on
the conditions and risks involved in these operations.
For instance, the PLB must be attachable to the
lifejacket, must be serviced once a year [8], activation
should be automatic and the beacons should be
visible on AIS receivers. Besides the signal reception
by the AIS, and ability to operate in 121.5 MHz, there
are a number of technologies designed to receive and
forward the PLB signal.
It is important to underline that this research deals
with the available technologies in maritime
environment, with no reference to their performance
on land or in air transport. Most of the available PLB
devices combine two or more technologies.
2.1 Epirb
An emergency position-indicating radio beacon
(EPIRB) buoy is a mandatory part of the vessel’s LSA
(Life Saving Appliances) equipment, which is
automatically activated in the event of maritime
accidents and is used in emergencies to locate vessels
in distress and in need of immediate SAR operation.
The system emits the 406 406.1 MHz signal that is
detected by satellites operated by COSPAS-SARSAT
(Cosmicheskaya Systyema Poiska Avariynyich Sudov
Search And Rescue Satellite Aided Tracking.),
rescue services [5]. The signal contains the distress
code, owner’s identification code, and location
identification code for SAR assistance, based on the
Doppler frequency shift or GNSS (Global Navigation
Satellite System) coordinates, along with a low-power
homing beacon that transmits on 121.5 MHz (Radio
direction finding tone), allowing SAR forces to home
in on the distress beacon once the 406 MHz satellite
system has provided the necessary position
information [10, 11, 20]. When one of the COSPAS-
SARSAT satellites detects a beacon, the detection is
passed to one of the program's earth Mission Control
Centres (MCC), where the detected location and
beacon details are used to determine which Rescue
Coordination Centre (RCC) to pass the alert to. The
RCC investigates the beacon alert (4560 min on
average) [21], and launches the SAR operation. The
system has global coverage and the position accuracy
varies from 25 km (without GNSS signal) to 100 m
(with GNSS signal) [11]. The average price of these
PLB devices is around 300 US dollars [14]. The device
has to be registered [6]. Due to the obvious
advantages of 406 MHz beacons and the significant
disadvantages to the older 121.5 MHz beacons, the
International COSPAS-SARSAT Program stopped
monitoring of 121.5/243 MHz analogue signals [1, 7,
10, 16]. However, the 121.5 MHz signal is still used
for close-in direction finding by SAR parties.
2.2 VHF DSC (Digital Selective Calling)
This system transmits alerts on VHF 70 Ch. Although
the GNSS position is shown, the bearing and distance
from the MOB/devices are not defined. This PLB
transmits the distress signal ('Mayday') until it
receives acknowledgment. The signal transmission
can be performed in two ways: in a closed loop,
where the PLB must contain the registered MMSI
(Maritime Mobile Service Identity) number of the
mother vessel (otherwise the vessels in the vicinity
will not receive any signal) and in an open loop,
where the signal is emitted to all vessels, without the
need of programming the mother MMSI number [8].
The priority is given to the open loop transmitting as
the system can be set to alert the mother ship only for
the first 5-10 minutes and then to switch to open loop
option, alerting all vessels or a group of vessels using
the MMSI format [12]. As most of the received DCS
messages are false distress signals and secondary
maritime information, it is very likely that the PLB
signal transmitted via VHF DSC will remain
unnoticed. The signal range varies from 15 NM (other
vessels) to 150 NM (air-borne search resources) [21].
However, the system enables the signal reception by
the mother vessel and the vessels in the vicinity, thus
allowing a timely response to the MOB situation.
623
2.3 SEND (Satellite Emergency Notification Device)
Although originally designed for the use on land, this
system can be used by maritime structures as well.
The user part features personal transmitters assisting
in locating a person via a satellite signal that is not
part of the SARSAT system. Some designs of this
device allow a two-channel radio-communication,
message sending, navigation assistance, etc. The
devices has to be registered, the service implies a
monthly subscription or other ways of payment, as
the system uses the satellites engaged in commercial
systems, e.g. Globalstar or Iridium Satellite LCC [13].
2.4 AIS
The mandatory AIS system may be used for receiving
PLB signals within the reach of the VHF transmission.
It is considered as best in MOB locating, provided that
the AIS devices displays the MOB symbol accurately
and triggers the MOB alarm, otherwise the PLB AIS
signal may remain unnoticed. Depending on the very
PLB device and the antenna direction, the range
varies from 8 NM (AIS receivers on vessels) to 75 NM
(AIS receivers on air-borne search resources) [8, 21].
The system is most efficient when a MOB situation is
handled with the mother vessel, since the AIS receiver
cannot re-transmit the MOB message [20].
2.5 121.5 MHz PLB. AIS.
The 121.5 MHz is originally an analogue aviation
band distress frequency that can be used by PLB
devices independently or in combination with any of
the above-described technologies. If used
independently by PLB equipment, the signal can be
received across 2/3 of the global surface [11]. The
system does not indicate the GNSS position and the
beacon position is determined by the signal’s
direction and intensity. The devices does not have to
be registered and is used anonymously [2], which has
resulted in a large number of false alarms and
unnecessary SAR operations (around 2% of the
received signals referred to real accidents) [11].
Moreover, a 121.5 MHz signal may be triggered by
cash machines (ATM), video walls, large screens at
playing fields and the like, and the interference from
other electronic and electrical systems is common. The
frequency is often routinely monitored by commercial
aircraft, but has not been monitored routinely by sea-
going vessels and the necessary response may fail.
Another downside is that the devices are subject to
national legislations and are not present worldwide.
For instance, the use of PLBs transmitting only
analogue signals in maritime environment is banned
in Japan, Korea and Malta, and is limited in Spain,
Poland, Australia, Canada, Germany, etc. [3, 19]. The
results of previous testing of the range and efficiency
of these devices are shown in Table 1.
3 FINDINGS
In early November 2019, tests were carried out on the
training-research vessel “Naše more” in Brački Kanal
(Brač Channel between the Island of Brač and City of
Split on the mainland). The weather conditions
included the state of the sea 23, WSW wind 3m/s,
waves 0.51.25 m. A PLB model M100 made by Ocean
Signal company was used for testing. In addition to
the analogue 121.5 MHz, the device transmits AIS
signal as well. Table 2 presents technical specification
of the PLB transmitter.
The testing was performed through simultaneous
reception of signals by two separate systems. The first
system included the antenna HYPER LOG 7060 and
receiver SPECTRAN HF 6065, with their respective
specifications in Tables 3 and 4. The signals were
processed by a dedicated program MSC Realtime
Spectrum Analyzer Software, designed by the same
manufacturer.
Table 1. Average detection range of AIS and 121.5 MHz devices
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
System frequency Typical surface detection range Typical detection range Detectable by low earth
by ship/(antenna height) by aircraft/(altitude) orbiting satellite
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
156.525 MHz (Annex 2) 1-5 NM (2-9 km)/(10 m) 20-30 NM (37-56 km)/(2,000 ft) No
121.5 MHz (Annex 4) 8 NM (14.8 km) /(2 m) 40-70 NM/(30,000 ft) No
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Source: [16]
Table 2. Specification of PLB M100 transmitter
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Homing Transmission
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Transmit Power 50 mW
Frequency 121.5 MHz
Modulation AM, Sweep tone
AIS transmission
Transmit Power (EIRP) 1 Watt
Frequency 161.975 / 162.025 MHz +- 500 Hz
Baud rate 9600 baud
Synchronisation UTC
Messages Message 1 (Position), Message 14 (MOB status)
Repetition interval 8 messages/minute; Message 14 sent twice every 4 minutes
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Source: [17]