663
1 INTRODUCTION
Mostcompanies canbenefit from accessing
international markets to source or produce their
goods. However, when it comes to setting up their
import supply chain, few companies are fully
prepared to take advantage of their efficiencies a
majorhurdletosuccess.Unnecessarycostsanddelays
can diminish the init
ial value of sourcing from
international markets, which in turn, diverts focus
and resources from business growth. A number of
elementscanaffecttheperformanceofimportsupply
chains, making it important for companies to work
withapartnertohelpthemverifythat:
Theentireimportsupplychainisoperatinginthe
smartest and most efficient manner for their
business
Therearecontingencypla
nsandprocessesinplace
toaddresspotentialissuesorchallenges
Stakeholders have access to the right level of
supply chain visibility throughout the import
process
Companiesmaintaincontrolovertheiroperations
andshipmentsevenfromthousa
ndsofmilesaway
The common goal to reduction the cost and
maximizetherevenues
The New Suez Canal influencing to Enhancing Africa
Inbound Maritime Logistics & Operations
A.Elentably
KingAbdulAzizUniversity,Jeddah,SaudiArabia
ABSTRACT:
Inhabit in ports is original sin associated with delays, queuing and extra time of voyage and
inhabit of ships and cargo at the port, which always occur with unpleasant consequences on Logistics and
supply chain. These often translates into
extra costs, loss of trade and disruption of trade and transport
agreements.InastudytoidentifytheconsequencesofportcongestiononLogisticsandsupplychainoperations
insomeAfricanports,thispapertrytodiscoveringthebenefitsofnewSuezcanala
ndreflectionofAfricaports
inadditionLogisticsa
reaexaminedthecommonportcongestionscenarios,theirdimensionsandthevarious
factors that trigger inhabit in the ports of Lagos, Durban, Mombasa and the catchment ports focusing with
expectationearningresultedbythenewSuezcanal.Thispapertypicallyappliedtheconceptofvariationsin
turnaroundtimeofshipsa
ndcargoandtheport’scapacityandrelativeefficiencylevelinordertoident
ifythe
active
factors that cause port congestion in African ports. The results provided some explanations on the
consequencesarisingfromtheseonnotableAfricanlogisticsandsupplychainnetworks.Thefindingsrevealed
that the bane of congestion in African
ports em
anates entirely from either planning, Regulation, capacity,
efficiencyora combinationofthese.InadditionthereforerecommendsthatAfricanportsshouldenhancetheir
regulatory mechanisms,
and then to improve capacity and efficiency level in order to shoulder the ever
increasing challenges of port congestion in yea
rs ahead with combined and take part of New Suez Canal
advantages.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 11
Number 4
December 2017
DOI:10.12716/1001.11.04.13
664
The top business pressures companies are facing
include growing global operations and complexity,
the need to improve supply chain operations and
shipment accuracy, speed and timeliness, and
pressures to reduce supply chain execution costs
focusing on enhancing import supply chains can
addressallofthesepressurepoints.Thefollowingis
anindepthlookatthechallengesandopportunities
thatexistinthekeystagesoftheimportsupplychain,
including the solutions and new Suze canal role to
support African ports enhance their global supply
chainandlogisticsoperations
2 LOGISTICSCOMPANIESANDEMPLOYERS
LOOKSTOACHIEVETHEFOLLOWING:
Growingglobaloperations/complexity
1 Need to improve supply chainoperational speed
and/oraccuracy
2 Increased demand for accuracy and timeliness of
shipmenteventinformation
3 The business mandate to reduce supply chain
executioncosts
In this regardShipping companies must instill a
performancemanagement culture in their
organizations: stating clear goals
and closely
monitoring performance are essential for achieving
and sustaining
positive impact. Key performance
indicators (KPIs), such as adherence tothe schedule
and compliance with slow steaming, should be
establishedtopromotemoreefficientbunkeruse,and
they should be linked to departments or cross
departmentteams so thatthe company canimprove
accountability, ownership, and collaboration. They
should also be
defined to exclude uncontrollable
factors,suchasregionspecificpricevolatility,tothe
greatest extent possible. Perhaps most important,
KPIsshouldbesufficientlydetailedforthecompany
tobe able to determine what iscausing
underperformance and then begin improving it. In
additiontotheavailabilityofstrategiesoverthe
long
termforthetransitiontothenewwaterway,theSuez
Canal where there were many positives resulting
fromthe expansion of theSuezCanal andsome are
linked to the economies of the fuel in operating
exploited the current decline in oil prices as well as
thebestuseto
reducemarinedistanceshippinglines
and the waiting times of ships may It reached the
standards of an ideal as outlined in the following
table .Dashboards can also increase operational
awareness and create value by communicating best
practices between teams on shore and at sea. For
example, enhanced performance monitoring
and
improved communications can help minimize
variations in speed and thereby reduce bunker
consumption. Finally, industry benchmarks—
including KPIs that cover both consumption and
procurement performance—can highlight best
practices,andrevealareasneedingimprovement,for
each vessel class. Companies can use these
benchmarkstosettangiblegoalsandtoevaluatethe
successofimprovementinitiatives.
Moreover.Partnerships between ship operators
andshipowners,ports,orbunkersupplierscanplay
a key role in lowering costs. When implemented
correctly,partnershipsbetweenoperatorsandowners
canproducewinsforbothparties.Thesepartnerships
are especially valuable for container carriers that
operate time charter
vessels. Such vessels have
slightly higher bunker costs than vessels owned by
carriers.Becausethecarrierspayforbunkerinatime
charter arrangement, ship owners and their crews
typically lack incentives to curtail bunker
consumption. To address this, carriers should work
withtheownersoftimechartervesselstoapply
best
practices in fuel efficiency and to permit the
installation of consumptionmonitoring equipment
andenergysavingdevices
Theimpactofastrongglobaltradecomplianceon
a company’s bottom line is evident. Companies
considered best in class in maintaining compliance
errorsandshipmentsheldatcustomsataminimum,
spend less in compliance costs and have higher
productivity levels than the industry average. It is
criticalforcompaniestoaddresspotentialissuesand
challengesrelatedtoglobaltradecompliancefromthe
beginning to avoid potentially costly fines and
customs delays in their import supply chains
improper classification and regulatory
knowledge
gaps can pose a significant risk to the importer.
Similarly, a lack of insight into existing preferential
trade agreements can mean missed opportunities
potentially totaling millions of dollars. Considerable
timeandmoneycanbesavedbycompaniesthattake
advantage maintained by the expansion Suze canal
(NewSuzeCanal).
3 THESTATUSOFTHEMOSTIMPORTANT
AFRICANPORTS
There is no doubt that there is a strong and close
correlation values between the flow and the flow of
goods from the sea ports and among logistics
operations, which aims eventually to the speed of
delivery of goods of various kinds
of raw materials
andmaterial s,semifinishedproductsandfinaltothe
enduserofthegoodssothatitcantakeadvantageof
twobasicthings:
1 Theflowofproductionlinesandthesuccessionof
itsproducts
2 Thesavingsresultingfromthespeedoftrading
With the
fact that Transporting goods by sea
remainsthemostcommonwaytotradeglobally,but
in Africa cargo spends an abnormally long time in
portsbeforeitismovedinland,presentingaserious
obstacle to the successful integration of subSaharan
economiesinworldwidetradenetworks.Theportof
Durban, however,
has managed to buck the trend.
which titled “cargo spend weeks in subSaharan
African ports”, Not only African ports in particular,
but this logo extends to most developing countries
whichanalyzedlessonsfromsixcountries,foundthe
average cargo waiting time to be 20 days and that
morethan
halfofthetimeneededtotransportcargo
fromportstohinterlandcitiesinlandlockedcountries
in subSaharan Africa is wasted because of the time
cargo spend in ports. longer transport times
dramaticallyreducetradeandestimatesthateachday
in transit is worth 0.6% to 2% of the value
of the
goods.Longtransitdelaysalsosignificantlylowerthe
665
probabilitythatacountrywillsuccessfullyexportits
goods.Africa ʹsestimatedinfrastructuredeficitof$48
billion a year is often singled out as the culprit for
hampering trade in and around the continent, but
reasonsforbottlenecksarefarmorecomplexandalot
morechallengingtoresolve.Long
dwelltimesarein
theinterestofcertainplayersinthesystemand that
dealingwiththeproximatecauseoftheproblem,such
as the apparent lack of berths in African ports, is
unlikelytotriggerasolution.ʺSpecifically,importers
use the ports to store their goods; in Douala
(Cameroon)
for instance, storage in the port is the
cheapestoptionforupto22days,ʺCustomsbrokers,
meanwhile, have little incentive to move the goods
because they can pass on the costs of delay to the
importers.Worsestill,whenthedomesticmarketisa
monopoly,thedownstreamproducerhasan
incentive
to keep the cargo dwell times long as a way of
deterringentry of other producers.ʺ The evidence in
thestudyshowsthatdiscretionarybehaviorsincrease
systeminefficienciesandraisetotallogisticscosts.ʺIn
most ports in subSaharan Africa, the interests of
controllingagencies, portauthorities,privateterminal
operators,logisticsoperators(freightforwarders)and
largeshipperscolludeattheexpenseofconsumers,in
additionʺ the surveys demonstrate that low logistics
skills and cash constraints explain why most
importers have no incentive to reduce cargo dwell
timeas,inmostcases,doingsowouldincreasetheir
input costs.ʺMoreover, some
terminal operators
generate large revenues from storage, and customs
brokersdonotnecessarilyfighttoreducedwelltime
because time inefficiency is charged to the importer
andeventuallytotheconsumer.ʺ
4 THEREGIONALCAUSESPREVALENTIN
AFRICANPORTS
MajorcausesofportweaknessinAfricaare:
1 Ship berth congestion,mainly
causedbybunching
ofshipswaitingon theportentryroutesbecause
the other ships to have occupied the available
berth designated or likely to be allocated to the
waitingtraffic.
2 Ship delays, mainly caused by delays attributable
tolapsesintheprocedureforworkonloadingand
/ or unloading
the ship, which could result in
stoppages that could elongate the period of time
the ship had to remain in port to accomplish the
cargooperationtask.
3 Vehicle Gate traffic, mainly resulting from poor
programming of landward access to the port via
trucks scheduled arrivals at the port gate. If
impediments or
programming defaults occur, it
will instantaneously send queuing signals to
trucks coming into or out of the port gate for
delivery or evacuation of cargo. This results in
portgatecongestion.
4 Vehicle motions, mainly resulting from lapses
associated with loading or unloading of vehicle
and trucks either due to lack of
requisite
equipment or due to low efficiency at which
vehicleworkisdelivered.
5 Cargo handling, mainly emanating from
continuous stay of cargo at the storage area
beyond reasonable hours/days or above the
maximumcapacityofthecargostackingarea.
6 Ship mooring route arisesmainlywhenthereisany
circumstantialblockadeonthe
marinesideaccess
routes to the port facility. Such blockade could
leadtoqueuing,bunchingand ultimatelyoverstay
ofshipsaroundtheportfacility.
The definition of inhabit time is the time cargo
remainsinaterminalʹsintransitstorageareaswhile
awaiting shipment for export or onward
transportation by
road or rail to the hinterland as
import. Inhabit time is one indicator of a portʹs
efficiency. The higher the dwell time, the lower of
efficiency.Moreover,longerinhabittimesresultsinto
inefficienciesrelatingtoportcongestionoroverstock
andcanhaveanadverseeffectoneconomicgrowth.
In
addition to operational reasons previously
mentionedthereareanumber ofreasonsbeyondthe
controlofportsandlogisticsareasinAfricaandvary
fromonearea toanotherandthusthelogisticsareato
anotherarea,including:
Badweatherthatstopsshipsorcargooperations;
Accidents that could
suddenly damage port
equipmentorshipentryroute;
Industrialactionthatentailsworkstoppageatthe
port, labor strike or limitation of stevedoring
services.
Suddenincreaseorpeakintradedemand.
Surge in international trade on certain articles or
betweencertaincountriesorregions.
Land side
transport congestion that could slow
downtheevacuationanddeliveryofcargooutof
the Port, thereby blocking the discharge of more
cargo as storage capacity is exhausted or
overstretched.
Harborport/routethatconnectsshipstotheport.
Channel water of port entry or access to a
particularterminal.
Lackofappropriateequipmentorquayterminalto
handlewithcertainshipsorservices.
Lackofdocumentationprocess.
Congestionofcargoonthequayapron.
Congestionoftruckswithinportorterminal.
Unsatisfactoryofcargoatstorageyardsandsheds.
Insufficientalongthelandward
accessroutetothe
port.
Scanty associated with internal mobility in port
city.
Out of control emanating from effects of public
holidaysandworkfreedays.
5 THEMAINCAUSESOFTHEWEAKNESSOF
LOGISTICSNETWORKSPRODUCTIVITY
1 Theweaknessofcargoflowthroughtheshipping
lanesaroundthe
world(externalcauses)
2 Theweaknessoftheflowofgoodsbetweenships
andportterminals(internalcauses)
3 Overstockandtheslowflowofgoodsbetweenthe
port terminals to the final destination (Domestic
causes)
666
6 NIGERIAASAFRICANPORTSEXAMPLE
In an effort to ease congestion at the Lagos Port
Complex, Nigeria is looking intoways to encourage
shippers to use the countryʹs underutilized eastern
ports more. The country identified better use of its
easternportsasoneofthequickestwaysto
decongest
Lagos, Nigeria’s largest container gateway. Lagos is
thesecondlargestmanufacturinghubinthecountry,
which is the continent’s largest and fastestgrowing
economy. Nigeria has currently been adopting
policiesandstrategiesthatcouldencourageshippers
to use the country’s six main eastern ports at Onne,
Calabar,PortHarcourt,
Warri,SapeleandKoko.
Nigeriabeingapredominantlyimportdependent
country, particular for manufactured goods and
certain raw materials is always susceptible to port
congestionanditsnegativeeffects.Forinstance,strike
threatbyclearingandforwardingagentsassociations
operatinginNigerianseaportsmaymeanmorethan
imaginedforthecountry’s
economyasafewdaysof
not moving cargoes out of the Lagos seaports can
cause the level of congestion that can create
unnecessary expenses and costs to the economy.
AnotherimplicationofportcongestioninLagosports
is the nonaccessible commercial city of Apapa in
whichthousandsof
manhoursarealreadybeinglost
totrafficgridlockdaily.Somuchhasbeenaboutthe
gridlock at Apapa that has seemingly defied all
solutions. Beyond the confusion on the road, the
trafficsituationisalsotobeaffectingshipsberthingat
theLagosports.Theyarereportedly queuingupfor
days,andin some cases weeks,before being ableto
berthanddischargetheircontents.Vesselsconveying
containers and other general goods were unable to
berth due to lack of space at the port to discharge
their contents. Similarly, some tanker vessels
conveyingpetrol,aviationfuel and otherliquidsare
sometimesstrandedfordaysorweeks,astheycannot
discharge their contents to a number of tank farms
located in the Apapa area. This is because tankers
expectedtotakefuel fromthetankfarmsarestuckin
traffic.Attimes,over21vesselsusualwereawaiting
berth because of the
congestion at the ports. A ship
berths when it comes into the port to discharge
importedmaterialsandloadexportmaterials.Inthis
regard,dischargedproductsaretakenawayfromthe
ports by trucks. Now, if the trucks can’t get in, the
imports would remain in the port, leaving no
room
forfreshimportstobedischarged.Thiswouldcause
shipsthathavealreadyberthedtowait.Iftheshipson
berth do not leave, those arriving cannot berth.
Therefore, they would keep waiting, all the while
burningfuelandhavingtopayemployeesonboard.
When they could have quickly
discharged their
contents, picked up exports and moved on to their
next destination. The same situation applies to the
importationofliquidproductslikefuel.Whenaship
brings in fuel, there are smaller vessels that convey
this product to the tank farms. Now, if the retail
tankerscannotget
accesstothetankfarmstooffload
the products, there would not be any space for the
tank farms to accommodate new products. This is
affectingeveryonenegatively.So how do you expect to
be addressing the following shortcomings of the Nigeria
Ports under the multi-advantages resulted from the new
Suez Canal:
Figure1.
Questions about the efficiency of cargo handling
equipment at the terminals, which results into
ships waiting to get a space to berth in order to
discharge cargo at the terminals. The waiting is
oftennecessitatedbythepresenceofothervessels
at the berths discharging cargo as well, albeit
slowly.
Numerouspublicholidaysatcertainseasonsofthe
yearalsodisruptsportoperationstoanextendthat
queuing results into bunching of vessels either
waitingto enter or halting operations at berth or
evennonevacuationofcargooutoftheport.
Persistent refusal by shipping companies to
transfertheircontainerstooffdockfacilitieshave
667
alsobeenidentifiedasoneofthemajorcausesof
congestionatthecontainerstorageyardsinmost
terminalsinNigerianports.
AsaresultoftheconcessionoftheNigerianports
andterminalstoprivateoperatorsbytheNigerian
governmentownedportAuthority, thesystemof
ship allocation
to berths was controlled by the
concessionaires,therebynegatingtheevenspread
of berth utilization, which causes congestion in
highly patronized terminals leaving less
competitive operators with idle berths. This
situationcompoundswaitingtime,increasesdelay
andadduptolossofrevenueonidleberths.
Cumbersome ship and
cargo clearance and
documentation process has also exerted a lot of
pressureoncongestioninNigerianportsofLagos.
Thisisasafalloutofthebureaucraticandmulti
agency roles played on the process of ship and
cargo clearance in the ports. Delays and
subsequent congestion in this regard
emanates
from positioning of containers for scanning,
physicalexaminationandtheprocessofreleasefor
delivery, which sometimes takes weeks to
accomplish.
This situation can be applied to many African
ports such as Durban, Mombasa, Doula, Lagos and
others
7 THEKEYSTOSUCCESSSHIPPINGAND
AFRICANLOGISTICS:
Byfollowingthisframework,acompany
canrealize
annualsavingsof5to10percent.(SeeExhibit1and2.)
Figure2.
Figure3.
One global tanker management company
operating a large fleet, for example, used this
frameworktoidentifyinitiativesthattheorganization
hopedwouldachieveannualsavingsonbunkercosts
ofapproximately8percent.Atopquartileperformer
in most dimensions of Tanker Benchmarking
Initiative, the company recognized that it needed to
optimize its endtoend bunker process for even
greater performance. The leaders responsible for
bunkercostmanagementhonedtheirimplementation
skills. Members of the relevant departments became
highly engaged, supporting the initiatives and
transferring capabilities deep into the organization.
Moreover, top management closely monitored
progressthroughmonthlyperformancereviews.
A
leading global containership management
company also applied the framework, hoping to
realizeannualbunkercostsavingsofupto7percent.
The company was particularly interested in freeing
upcashintheshorttermtoimplementaturnaround
strategy. Consequently, time‐ and resource
consuming initiatives, such as optimizing the
fleet
andimprovingportoperations,werenotconsidered.
Instead, the company focused on shorterterm
initiatives, such as streamlined port approaches,
accelerated hull cleaning, efficient engine operation,
and optimized trim (the distribution of load and
ballast). After an eightweek diagnostic period, the
companyrolledoutapilotinstagesacross
sixservice
lines, led by a crossfunctional team. The first pilots
achieved cost reductions in the range of 4 to 11
percent.
7.1 GoingbeyondSlowSteaming
Overall, shipping companies have made significant
progress in implementing reduced sailing speed,
knownas“slowsteaming,”to consume lessbunker.
Most companies
have also improved the way they
procure bunker. Yet very few players have gone
beyond those basics. To establish bunker cost
management as a clear strategic priority, companies
need to mobilize crossfunctional teams to address
costs end to end, consider all possible improvement
levers, and lockin savings with diligence
and
discipline.Inourworkwithshippingcompanies,we
have identified seven tactics that foster continuous
improvementandhelpcompaniesbuildasustainable
competitiveadvantage.
7.2 Goforthequickwinsfirst
To build momentum and motivate the organization,
companiesshouldpursueimmediateinitialsuccesses
andthencelebratethosegains
withthecompanyand
reward the employees responsible for the results.
Examples of quick wins include optimizing the
frequencyofhullcleaningtoreducewaterresistance
and improving shiptoshore communication to
maximizesailingtimeandallowforslowsteaming.
7.3 Usecustomizeddecisionsupporttools
Companies should develop customized
decision
support tools, which solve complex issues by using
668
the same principles that traditional planners apply
but achieve results more quickly and with greater
accuracy.Leadingtankercompanies alreadyusesuch
toolsforliftingoptimizationandtankutilization.The
liftingoptimization tool helps a company develop a
planthatminimizesbunkercostswhileallowingthe
vessel to deliver its
cargo on time at the designated
port. The tankutilization tool is used to generate a
report with specific directions regarding all bunker
relatedactivities,suchasthesequenceoftanksfrom
which fuel is burned, placement of new loads in
emptytanks,transfersoffuelsamongtanks,andfuel
mixing.
7.4 Streamlineprocessesfromendtoend
Instead of focusing on specific steps, companies
should examine the entire bunker process including
technical efficiency, voyage execution, commercial
functions,andthelinkbetweenteamsonshoreandat
sea. Consider trim optimization, for instance.
Traditionally, shipping companies have focused on
optimizing the
distribution of load and ballast at
departure.
7.5 Strengthenskills
Buildingstrongerskillsthroughouttheorganization,
includingtheleadersandteamsonshoreandatsea,
will help lower costs. Skills that enhance cross
departmental collaboration—such as early
communicationof changes in voyage prospects—are
especially important for achieving rapid savings.
Defineclearresponsibilitiesandaccountabilities
7.6 Blueprintcleargoalsfortheorganizationandmonitor
performance
In this regard Shipping companies must instill a
performancemanagement culture in their
organizations: stating clear goals and closely
monitoring performance are essential for achieving
and sustaining positive impact. Key performance
indicators (KPIs), such as adherence to the
schedule
and compliance with slow steaming, should be
establishedtopromotemoreefficientbunkeruse,and
they should be linked to departments or cross
departmentteams so thatthe company can improve
accountability,ownership,andcollaboration.
7.7 Createpartnerships
Partnerships between ship operators and ship
owners,ports,andcorrectlywaterchannel
orbunker
supplierscanplayakeyroleinloweringcosts.When
implemented correctly, partnerships between
operators.Ownersandcorrectlyshippingroutescan
produce wins for all parties. These partnerships are
especiallyvaluableforcontainercarriersthatoperate
timechartervesselssuchvesselshaveslightlyhigher
bunkercoststhanvessels
ownedbycarriers.Because
the carriers pay for bunker in a time charter
arrangement, ship owners and their crews typically
lackincentivestocurtailbunkerconsumption.
8 SPOTLIGHTOFADVANTAGESNEWSUZE
CANAL
Figure4.
According to reports from the Suez Canal
Authority,thetotalnumberofshipspassingthrough
the canal increased 2 percent in 2015 to 17,483.
However,thenumberofbulkcarriers and container
ships fell 5.7 percent and 3.1 percent respectively.
Over the last decade, trades passing through the
Canalrecordedsignificant
annualincreases,withthe
exceptionof the three years between 2009 and 2011,
andincreasingbyover300milliontonsbetween2004
and 2014 when it changed from 520 to 822 million
tons.Theupwardtrendandthepressureforagreater
predictability of the transit time an element
increasingly important for container traffic that
representsmorethan50%ofthevolumeofthemarket
served by the Canal pushed the Egyptian
Government to realize, in a very short time, an
investmentofconsiderableeconomicandgeopolitical
importance.
Thefocusoftheanalysisistheimpactwhichthe
expansion
of the Suez Canal may determine on the
trafficintheMediterraneanandittakesintoaccount
the specific geographical background in the area of
the Canal and in the Sinai Peninsula and the
expansion as part of a specific path of economic
growth driven by public long term strategies.
In
particular,specialattentionisdirectedatthepossible
increase in the exchange between Mediterranean
countriesandthoseoftheGulf,inlightoftherecent
evolutionofinternationalpoliciesthatwillleadtothe
fullinclusionofIranamongstthecountriesinvolved
669
inthecommercialexchangeswithleadingcompanies
intheWesternworld.
Egyptisthecountryintheworldofasignificant
size. Moreover, the following positive reflection of
NewSuzeCanal:
The area of the new Suez Canal will be able to
competewiththemajorlogisticsregionsinthe
world
andinparticularwithNorthernEuropeancitiessuch
asRotterdamandHamburg.
Table1.Examplessaving NauticalMilesforshipping
routesbyNewSuzeCanal
_______________________________________________
FromToDistance(NM) Saving
SC Cape Miles %
_______________________________________________
RasTanuraConstanza 4144 12094 7950 66
Lavera 4684 10783 6099  57
Rotterdam 6436 11169 4733  42
NewYork 8281 11794 3513  30
Jeddah Piraeus 1320 11207 9887  88
Rotterdam 6337 10743
4406  41
Tokyo Rotterdam 11192 14507 3315  23
Singapore Rotterdam 8288 11755 3647  29
_______________________________________________
Sources:Reuters/EIA/SuezCanalAuthority
The 2015 order book provides for an increase, by 2018,
of the fleet of container ships amounting to about 7%, with
the figure rising to 72% if we consider the megaship
ranging from 18.000 to 21.000 TEUs, and 20.7% for the
fleet from 13.000 to 18.000 TEUs.
The estimates for 2018 predict a number of 83
megaships, mainly concentrated in the far Northeast of
Europe and far East-Mediterranean routes where the Great
Alliances also operate - amongst others - the 2M and the
Ocean Three which, on the Asia-Med route, holds a market
share of respectively 39% and 27%.
The potential impact on the choice of the routes by
shipping companies is evident when considering that the
opening of the new Canal led to a decrease in the transit
time from 18 to 11 hours. In particular, it is estimated that
using the Suez route, any shipping company may have an
average saving of 5-10% of total operating costs
(depending on routes and distances). For example, on the
Honk Kong-New York route, the new Canal, with its
reduction in transit time, might be a valid alternative to
Panama.
The reduction of transport costs, combined with the
increased capacity of the Canal, might have important
implications both on the hierarchy of the Mediterranean
ports and on the volume of traffic bound for the
Mediterranean which, in 2015, remained at 19% (up, if
compared to 15% in 2005).
The strengthening of the Mediterranean-Suez-Gulf
route is a strategic opportunity both for Egypt and Africa
channels especially for its Northern regions, which could
develop its natural role as a logistics platform in the heart
of the Mediterranean, thus supporting as well the Africa
economy.
9 THEIMPACTOFEGYPTʹSPORTSINTHE
WORLDSUPPLYCHAIN
Egypt has a primary role in the world supply chain thanks
to the production and consumption cycle activated by the
presence of 85 million citizens that makes Egypt the
principal country in North Africa and due to the
metropolitan area of Cairo where over 15 million
inhabitants live and which makes it the second larger
African city after Lagos. In fact, Egypt’s relevance derives
almost entirely from its geographic position, being at the
intersection of the main maritime flows between East and
West of the northern hemisphere. Furthermore, it features
some of the major African ports (Alexandria, Damietta and
Port Said) and airports (Cairo).
Despite these elements of comparative advantages,
throughout history Egypt drew little economic benefits
from logistics and transport on the routes both to and from
the African continent and on the intercontinental routes,
failing to fully exploit the Suez Canal, to implement
industrial policies and not addressing the development of
this sector. In addition, the commitment of Egypt in pur-
suing the success of the COMESA-EAC_SADC tripartite
Free Trade Area is certainly meant to help reversing this
situation, assuring a better exploitation of its geographical
potential (SRM will soon release a study in which the
potential benefit for Egypt from a stronger African trade
integration will be highlighted).
The biannual report “Connecting to compete” from the
World Bank examines in detail the strategic elements of
Egyptian transport and logistics through the Logistics and
Performance Index (LPI). Such an indicator is the result of
a collaboration between the World Bank, the main ope-
rators of logistics and scholars. The report, compiled every
two years (World Bank, 2014) has the specific purpose to
help the countries identify the strengths and weaknesses of
their port system to program their investment in a more
effective way. Actually, the study of the World Bank points
out that with the same per capita income, countries with
better logistics performance grow more, by 1% of GDP and
2% of trade.
It is generally acknowledged that an efficient logistics
chain may foster the development of trade and growth. In
fact, LPI endorse this theory showing that a better logistics
performance positively affects the expansion of trade,
export diversification, the ability to attract foreign direct
investment and economic growth.
The Logistics and Performance Index2 summarizes the
results of the countries on six complementary areas of
evaluation.
Efficiency of the clearance process.
Quality of trade and transport related infrastructure.
Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments.
Competence and quality of logistics services.
Ability to track the hint of consignments.
Timeliness of shipments in reaching destinations within
the scheduled or forecast delivery time
In particular, major investments were realized in Port
Said and Damietta in the Mediterranean. Port Said is the
principal Egyptian trans-shipment port located along the
Suez Canal. Within the port, which becomes operational
starting in 2004, there are several terminal operators
belonging to world leading companies in the industry of
containerized traffic, like APM Terminal, (Maersk group)
and COSCO Pacific. The port is divided into two parts,
Port Said and Port Said East, the first featuring an 800
thousand TEUs capacity, and the second with 2.7 million
TEUs. The infrastructure is spread over an area of 90
hectares with a draft ranging from -14 m to -16.5 m and it
comprises of 21 quay cranes. Trade rose from 1.62 million
TEUs in 2005 to 3.96 in 2013. The development plans of
670
the infrastructure include an expansion of up to 5.4 million
TEUs.
The development of the Suez Canal is part of an
economic development path which saw the transport,
maritime and port sector at the center of a number of
massive infrastructural and organizational investments
aimed at retrieve efficiency in worldwide trades as
witnessed by the improvements in Egypt’s position in the
World Bank rankings (up by 35 positions in the Logistics
Performance Index between 2007 and 2014) and in the
UNCTAD world rankings where Egypt in 2015 is 19th
with a value of 61.5 compared to the 67.4 of Italy and to
68.8 of Japan, it rosette three positions compared to 2010.
Between 2000 and 2014 the trend in the sector were
very positive (overall +123%) with southbound traffic
which grew more (+162%) compared to the northbound
ones (+94%). This differentiated trend confirmed also itself
in the first 6 months of 2015 compared to the same period
of 2014 showing +7.7% in southbound traffic and a slight
drop in northbound traffic (-1.2%) mostly due to a
reduction in the tonnage of crude oil (-21.7%).
About 53% of all the 2014 traffic was made up of
container ships (55% northbound and 51% southbound),
11% of these ships transported crude oil (17% northbound
and 4% southbound), 5% of the cargo was made up of
grains (0.1% northbound and 9.3% southbound).
The containerized flows influenced the evolution of
maritime transport through the Canal, in fact they globally
grew by 202% from 2000 to 2014 (although differently
with reference to the routes). As a matter of fact, north-
south containerized trade volumes grew by 187% while the
south-north ones grew by 219%, and in 2014 reached a
substantial balance (212 million tons north-south and 222
million tons south-north). This result can be explained by
looking at the operation of international trade characterized
by the phenomenon of globalization driven by the
relocation of production to countries with low labor costs,
mainly in the Asian continent. In addition, over the last few
years, the use of sacks to stow into the container goods that
previously used to be stowed as bulk or general cargo has
progressively led to the spread of containerization in a
growing number of productive chains (coffee, cocoa, seeds,
fertilizers and feed for fish). This partly explains the
contraction between 2000 and 2014 of some types of trades
passing through the Suez Canal; cement -96%, coal and
coke -61%, timber -49%.
10 INDEVELOPINGTHESUEZCANALZONEWE
HAVELISTENEDTOTHEPARTNERS
The Suez Canal Zone represents a new chapter in the
economic development of Egypt. While, the Suez Canal
Zone is governed by the General Authority for the Suez
Canal Economic Zone: an independent body with executive
powers of regulation and approval including the full
authority to oversee all areas of operation, staffing, control
over budgets, funding, development of partnerships with
developers and business facilitation services.
The Suez Canal Zone will apply a new investor friendly
business environment that will be a blueprint for future
development nationally. It will be a genuine one-stop shop
with
all critical elements deployed. Simple declarative
investment registration systems with streamlined
investment approvals, granting of import and export
licenses as well as accelerated on-site customs inspection
procedures will be available. Similarly, secondary permits
and authorizations relating to land, building, labor, health
and safety will be addressed directly by the Suez Canal
Zone authority whose efficiency will be enhanced by
partnerships with key stakeholders including government
ministries, private sector representatives, be it developers or
investors in the zone, or affected communities and
community groups and certainly international development
partners.
The expected repercussions of the new canal on the
logistics, transportation and tourism sectors besides all
operations related to maritime flows as part of the Canal’s
development. It also highlighted the planning framework of
the new infrastructure in addition to the potential
investment opportunities and new projects that the
government intends to implement in the Suez Canal area.
The new canal will lead to a decrease in transit time from
18 to 11 hours and reduce maritime operating costs by 5-
10%. Plus considered Egypt Opens the Largest Wind
Power Station in MENA
The project includes the construction of a large seaport,
an industrial area with a capacity of 20 factories, a logistics
hub along with a residential area hosting 50,000 houses. A
fish farm and a road tunnel under the Suez Canal running
constructed
11 ADVANTAGESASLOGISTICHUB
1 Unique Geographic Position: Located at the crossroads
of international trade between Europe, the Middle East,
Africa and Asia, Egypt is positioned to become a major
global logistics hub. As a result, businesses are
increasingly seeking to base themselves in the country
as a springboard to Europe and booming regional
markets.
2 Rising Domestic Demand: A growing domestic demand
for imports and a rapid rise in export-oriented
businesses is creating strong demand for logistics and
transportation services in a market that is far from
saturated.
3 Greenfield Opportunities: Greenfield opportunities exist
in subsectors such as the road network, which is the
most, used means of transporting freight but currently
has no logistics provider with a consistent distribution
infrastructure.
4 Built-in Markets: Approximately 8% of world maritime
trade flows through the Suez Canal each year, with
many opportunities for ship/container repair and value
added Services. In addition, Egypt’s growing
import/export trade requires logistics and transportation
solutions. Built-in markets provide a broad customer
base and variety of opportunities for logistics and
transportation companies looking to set up shop in
Egypt.
5 Underdeveloped and Expanding Sector: Growing
demand is causing capacity short falls in the nation’s
logistics and transportation sector, which is currently
underdeveloped in terms of both infrastructure and
services. There are therefore, major investment
opportunities from infrastructure projects to value-
added services and the ability for investors to attain
large market share.
6 Labour Force: Egypt has a large, educated, trained and
competitively priced labour force eager to work in such
671
sectors as logistics and transportation. A government-
run industrial training program is providing hundreds of
thousands of skilled workers for the industry. These low
labour costs combined with educated, skilled labour
improve profitability year after year.
12 CONCLUSION
The Suez Canal has been an important part of the Egyptian
economy since its completion almost a century and half
ago. If properly enlarged and upgraded, it can turn the
region into a global port, and be an engine for development
and growth in Egypt for the 21st century. Nevertheless,
the mega project must be carefully planned and properly
managed and lessons must be learned from similar attempts
in other countries; otherwise, the project also risks draining
valuable resources. will remain modest performance for
African ports obsession importantly to the authorities of the
ports and to develop the necessary strategies for the
development of these ports so that the logistics sector of
advancement and access to tap ideal for operations of the
African Export and especially with the ownership of the
continent for most of the natural sources of wealth, and that
the other European countries and the United States, China,
Japan and South Korea side is looking and are deep to get
those natural resources which are considered raw materials
diverse industries and those countries most in need of
natural raw materials and then the logistics sector of Africa
by optimizing the mutual exchange with these countries in
this field, the savings that produces and resulted from a
project of the Suez Canal, which is the corridor the closest
of the African countries which are reflected pluses on the
overall savings that result on performance and economies
of ships run and shorten the Navy distances and the speed
of circulation of raw materials faster navigation and then
the speed and increase the returns to capital and encourage
the logistical expansion of African countries and then
considered the locomotive of growth for African countries,
which calls for many storage centers for African countries
move on either side of the Suez Canal and through the
economic zones of the Suez Canal plus take advantage of
the facilities offered by the Egyptian authorities
REFERENCES
[1] Ayah Aman,(2013) “UAE Replaces Qatar as Egypt’s
Partner on Suez Project,” Al-Monitor, “Egypt’s Sisi
Says Discussed Creation of Russian Industrial Hub in
Egypt as Part of Latest Suez Canal Development
Project,” CNBC Business News,
[2] Egypt Plans Extra Stimulus by Year-End, Suez Canal
Project,” Reuters, 11 November (2013),
[3] Marwan Kardoosh, (2005) “The Aqaba Special
Economic Zone, Jordan: A Case Study of Governance,”
Center for Development Studies, ZEF, Bonn, Germany,
[4] Mohamed Mahmoud, (2014) “Egypt to Develop Suez
Canal Corridor,” Al-Shorfa,
[5] T. Notteboom, (2012) “Towards a New Intermediate
Hub Region in Container Shipping? Relay and
Interlining via the Cape Route vs. the Suez
Route,” Journal of Transport Geography.
[6] “Troubled Waters (2013): Suez Canal Corridor
Development Project Problematic for Egypt,”
[7] Patrick Kingsley, (2014) “Egypt to Build New Suez
Canal,” The Guardian,
[8] Suez Canal Traffic Statistics, Brief Monthly Statistical
Report (2016),
[9] Sherine Abdel-Razek, (2014) “A New Suez Canal?” Al-
Ahram Weekly,
[10] World Bank, Trade and Transport Facilitation
Assessment (unpublished report) (Washington DC:
Author, 2015).
[11] The Management of Business Logistics: A supply
chain Perspective, Coyle,J.J, Thomason learning,
2002, ISBN: 0324007515.